Persuasive Essay On Banning The Box

The Tennessee Senate recently passed Senate Bill 2440 with a 25 to 7 vote. The bill, colloquially known as “ban-the box,” requires state employers to delay inquiring about criminal records while considering candidates for employment. Certain jobs do not qualify for this deferment, such as those requiring a criminal background check under federal law or jobs in education. Additionally, this bill is not an attempt to force employers to hire a convicted criminal, but rather necessitates a more holistic and thorough consideration of applicants, regardless of their criminal

Most who argue against censorship believe that it goes against a person’s right to freedom of speech. Within this argument, most people wonder “just when, and on what grounds, the state is justified in using its coercive powers to limit the freedom of individuals” (West). When thinking in this mindset, individuals tend to antagonize the government, because they come to believe that it suppresses their individuality and fail to consider the fact that it unites people who share its similar beliefs. As a result of the recent spike in technology and use of the Internet, the public must continually alter its definition of freedom of speech and expression. As the media offers more and more methods of communication, many of which are relatively self-regulated by users, more methods of expression develop, which may render other forms of expression obsolete, or even socially unacceptable (Qazi). Without understanding how much freedom of speech one is entitled to, one may never hope to defend that freedom if it ever comes under attack. Because technology develops so quickly that one definition will hardly suffice for a short period of time, people will find it increasingly difficult to understand how much right to expression they are allowed and will therefore fight for any and all that they may attain, never considering the benefits of censorship in the slightest. In America especially, people idealize the idea of democracy, the investigation of truth, and independence (Fieser). In

“Hey guys! This is the last communication you shall receive from me. I now walk out to live amongst the wild. Take care, it was great knowing you” (Qtd. In Krakauer 69). After graduating from Emory University, Christopher McCandless abandoned everything, gave his entire savings account to charity, and then hitchhiked to Alaska to live in the wild. In the novel, Into the Wild, Was McCandless justified in shunning society? McCandless was justified in shunning society because he simply wanted to find himself and be independent without any distractions from his friends or family.

California is known for Hollywood and its wonderful climate, where people meet celebraties and they can wear shorts in the middle of winter, but California is also know to be one of the few states that allow its citizens to vote for laws. Numerous laws are passed by Californians every year, some those laws deal with whether California should raise taxes or where the state need to spend their money and other matters that deal with California political system. Over the years, numerous laws that have been passed by Californians which have been conterversial and one of those laws is Propotion 13 of 1978.

Besides, assisting the ex-offenders in becoming competitive is equally important to make them productive to their employers if given equal opportunities. The program in Kentucky aims at making the employer understand their situation while getting back to the society. Thus, it assists them psychologically and through other means to prepare to face new challenges. Besides, some of the counties and cities that note the devastating effect of not employing the ex-convicts remove the criminal records from a job application. The reform commonly has the name ‘ban the box’ that aim at reducing discrimination of qualified ex-convicts while applying for jobs (Entin, 2015). The use of ban the box is beneficial especially in the early stages of the hiring process when employers do not know their potential employees

this type of proposition is not new to the voters of california. In the past several

One of the leading danger to the average citizen of California is the increase of crime rate. In modern days some citizens are even scared to carry out there lives due to rising gang activity. Recent studies show that 1 in 4 residents of California will at one point be a victim of violent crime such as murder, forced rape, robbery, aggravated assault, or burglary. The government would be doing an injustice to it’s own people by taking away their protection. Another

“Ban the Box” legislation takes the question about conviction history off of the job application and delays when the employer can ask about an applicant’s criminal history and/or run a criminal background check. This legislation has been enacted in over 100 cities and counties and 28 states with each government body having different requirements.

The benefits of having Ban the Box laws would reduce recidivism. Employment is a vital factor for people reentering society from prison because people with criminal records that have a stable working environment are less likely to reoffend (Weissert, 2016, p. 1534). Ban the Box laws differ for when the employer can find out about the applicants criminal history, but by not having to admit to a criminal history on the intimal application it allows employers to rely on unfounded stereotypes of people with criminal records than forming their own opinion of the applicants character (Weissert, 2016, p. 1536). By the employer not being able to find out later in the

California is a large state, it contains many different cities and many different kinds of people. Within this state there are large developed cities that have a population of over 3 million people, such as Los Angeles, and then there are some cities that have less than 100,000 people, like Redding. These two cities are located on the opposite sides of California, Redding is located in Northern California and LA is located in Southern California. The larger cities are mostly located in Southern California; therefore, they get the most representation. However, the smaller cities in Northern California practically get no say and are “underrepresented in the state legislature and ignored by California’s urban centers”, according to one the New York Daily News writer, Sarah Goodyear. This underrepresentation has affected Northern California cities in multiple ways.

Hey everyone, its that time of the year again. Cardboard nation is just a few weeks away so I am taking donations for it. All the money goes to Warm Blessings to help fund it and to help fight homelessness in our area. If anyone is wanting to give a donation and help sponsor me for it I would be grateful. If you aren't sure of what Cardboard Nation is. It is where members of our community all go to ECTC by the fire tower and we are given a small glimpse of what it is like to be homeless. We are given a box to sleep in for the night to simulate what kind of challenges go along with it. We are given a very light meal usually consisting of a sandwich and a little soup. We are not allowed to bring electronics or anything that could be considered

It is my recommendation that the California House of Representatives revisit AB 568 for a second vote in order to pass this bill into law after Governor Jerry Brown’s recent veto.

After conducting my own research on Ban the Box movement to prohibit employers from requiring disclosure of past criminal convictions on employment. I noticed that the Ban the Box movement was put together by civil rights groups, and other advocates for ex-offenders. The movement is also an international campaign that is aimed at convincing employers abroad to remove the criminal history box (box that asks if an applicant has been arrested) from the applications. I truly understand the purpose of this movement, which is to enable ex-offenders a better chance at landing a job while on parole or after they are released from jail. For instance, if an ex-offender has a tough time finding a job after incarceration, then he/she will have a higher

The pursuit of economic and employment equality should be the right of all; however, it is unfortunate that those with criminal histories are often deprived of this. The question of disclosure or banning the box is a dual edged sword by which many convicted individuals continue to suffer from. As discussed by Kevin Hyde in the video Ban The Box, many of the jobs that exclude persons with criminal backgrounds have little or nothing to do with the job being performed and that a key to reduction in crime is the employment of those individuals who are qualified to perform the tasks (Ban The Box -TedxJacksonville, 2015). Banning the box in theory from the community corrections side offers several promising benefits. The reduction of taxpayer funding because the offender is working and no longer a cost to the state or community, the reduction in recidivism due to employment, thus the decline in crimes committed as a means of support, and obviously gainful or marginal employment which raises the economic status of

Censorship has been a touchy topic over the past few years. Everyone has their own opinion on the topic, but the fact is censorship is way more damaging than people may notice. First off, the definition of censorship is to restrain, block, and censor ideas and information that some may find offensive. The basic definition of censorship completely violates the First Amendment. We, as Americans, have the right to Freedom of Speech. Censorship blocks that by blocking anything some may find offensive. It’s not fair because they’re blocking out how people feel/think just because someone found it “offensive” or wrong. It completely contradicts the First Amendment. People have the right to know about the world and what’s happening. Keeping the