Persuasive Essay On Civil Disobedience

voice his or her opinion on what direction the country should take in the next four years. Casting a vote, John Q. Taxpayer gets a voice in determining how some of his money will be spent, which issues will take priority and which will get pushed aside until the next election year. But what if choosing another president is not enough? What if John Q. Taxpayer believes his

The issue which is debated in the video is whether or not no-platforming is a legitimate

Civil disobedience is a nonviolent act that allows us to protest against, unjust laws or any policy that people do not tend to agree on. An example of someone that acted on this was, Martin Luther King Junior in “Letter from a Birmingham Jail, was the way that the did protest against human right and oppression, in the lense, Martin shows it and explains that on every act of injusticeness has a negative outcome. The artifact, “Antigone” by Sophocles you can see Antigone fight against the injustice act of burying her brother. In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action” (King Jr., 1). Both of these two uses four major principles, to fight against the importance of unjust laws.

Less than fifty years ago our nation was engulfed in the Civil Rights Movement. It is hard to believe that a place we live today, such as Saint Augustine, with nothing but joyful memories associated with it for us, could have been so different just fifty years ago. There were marches and civil protests held in our town. These peaceful protests along with many other acts of civil disobedience across the United States helped to change the ‘way of life’ for Americans everywhere. Martin Luther King was a significant figure in the fight for ending segregation using civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government. This tactic is best used for displaying the unjust characteristics of certain laws.

Civil disobedience has been around for many years and has earned us right. Movements and peaceful protest brought us where we are and fighting for what we believe is what makes us humans. We find that in certain situations, it is necessary to take action to maintain justice, safety and to ultimately help society. Therefore, civil disobedience has been the catalyst that promotes social progress.

Ban animal cruelty! Give aid to the poor! Save the rainforests! Obey the law! As a human race we must strive to fulfill these commands, for they are our moral duties and obligations. Our obligation to morality sometimes leads to a dilemma. What happens when a law contradicts the morally right thing to do? Would it be moral to act illegally by breaking the law? No matter how drastic the measure, we are still required to act morally--even if one must break the law to do so. But why is it so important to be moral that one could justify something as serious as breaking the law?

Disobedience a failure or refusal to obey rules or someone in authority. What we make of this is what determines who we are and what we chose to do. You can listen to what you are told to do, or you can disobey. To follow you may be following blindly, without a cause, without an idea in you mind at all. You don't know what other options you could've went with, you are following blindly. Unable to see, unable to figure anything truly out, you are a mindless being conforming to whatever is 'good'. You do what media tells you to do, you follow whatever order you are given, but all you are is a mindless human. Or you can break the control over your mind and take it upon yourself to defeat this, to defeat this order. To fight, to rebel, to resistance what the man tells you to do. When you disobey is when you are truly living, and when you truly live you can't go back to being dead once more.

As a second-generation immigrant from Africa, the civil right movement video interests me because I believe America is moving back to the way blacks were treated over 100 years ago. Even before watching the video, I was thought in my history classes in high school and college that the American civil right movement was a mass protest against racial segregation and discrimination mostly in the southern United States which captured national heights during the mid-1950s. In my opinion, racism is genetically inherited or it’s a nurtured attribute that is passed from generation to generation. Even with the end of the civil war in 1868 that led to the end of slavery, the eligibility of black male citizens in 1870 to vote in an election were still discouraged. This in turn, lead to violence and eventually legal stimulation. Does this not remind you of the 2016 general election that took place in the United States? The additional detriment is that the poor were also intimidated and denied their voting rights by not allowing them to register to vote, or closing the polling stations early. Projections from the United States show that there were over 231 million Americans eligible to vote, but a little over 138 million voted. That means 40 percent did not vote (Levine, 2016).

Susan B. Anthony, Frederick Douglas and Martin Luther King Jr. all fought for the improvement of the American society in different time periods ranging from the 1850s to the 1960s. Even today, activists are pushing to resolve civil liberty issues and to help the nation flourish. As time goes on, activists resolve these issues, but also discover new ones to work against through protests, petitions and other forms of propaganda. Issues with civil liberties that occurred in the past have since been resolved with the assistance of civil rights activists by the reinterpretation of freedom of speech, enforcement of the right to equal treatment under law, and the addition of gender equality in the right to vote.

The idea of civil disobedience has caused much squabble ;although nothing has been etched in stone. Some presume that the act of speaking out results in a negative effect. Even though In some cases this is sadly the truth; Others believe it can be the basis of a brighter future. If done without violence, if it’s done publicly, and if it’s not solely an individual tantrum, but an act of seeking an opportunity to better society around you, civil disobedience should not have a problem being justified.

Picture this: there is a large party being held where kids are dressed up, listening to music, and dancing around with their friends. This seems like clean fun. Right? According to all the adults in the town where these kids come from this should not be allowed. Participating in dancing or listening to rock music anywhere at anytime is illegal. To do any of these things is essentially breaking the laws that they have put in place. The kids however still try and go around this law and drive for an hour to listen to this music and dance outside of town. This happened in the movie but it is also an example of the sort of disobedience we see. to what they have been told to do. Disobedience is the refusal or neglect to obey something or someone (Merriam-Webster). We see or hear about this almost everywhere. There are many different reasons that people have to listen to when they are being told to do something by an authority figure in their lives and disobedience is one of them. Why do we listen to authority, and is disobedience such a bad thing?

In the novel, Hidden Figures, Mary Jackson’s husband states that “civil rights ain’t always civil.” This statement nods to the tribulations that African Americans went through in the 1950’s and 1960’s, a time of intense racism, in their fight to obtain their civil rights. Although the worst of that time period’s discrimination and violence is over, Mr. Jackson’s quote can still be applied to today’s struggle for civil rights. Both parties; those who believe they deserve civil rights and those who oppose them, can become just as violent as the other in their respective battles for what they believe is right. As America continues its forward movement in granting civil rights to each generation’s “oppressed,” hate and violence will almost assuredly follow from each side of the argument.

The issue of civil rights for gays and lesbians, one marriage; although many religious conservatives wish it would, will not kind of go away. Marriage essentially has always been a huge part of human relationships, which specifically is significant. It is the coming together of a man and a woman, the bonding two people together for emotional support, generally moral support and economic wellbeing as well as the rearing of children. Most of society basically looks at marriage as a holy union of just one man and one woman. Does marriage really have to generally be between just a man and women? The issue of -gay marriage generally has been very much in the front of public discussion in recent years, with states granting, then retreating with the marriage licenses to gay couples, squabbling over legislation as to whether to grant full marriage rights or specifically create domestic partnerships, and trying to come to terms with how to balance opposed view of sort of public opinions on the subject. Some specifically believe that giving gay couples the particularly full benefit of marriage will mostly take away from the traditional marriage, while others for the most part feel they ought to for all intents and purposes have nothing less, or so they specifically thought. Same-sex couples are denied their civil rights, for all intents and purposes such a making medical decisions for their partners in an emergency. Some of which for the most part have not been in contact with their

American history is full of triumph, but it also has its fair share of low moments. The United States system of law is based on a Constitution that begins with an all encompassing statement. However, liberties were not always had by anyone and everyone; there’s been many problems that continue into today. American citizens’ civil liberty issues have improved, but they have not been resolved because people continue to hinder the less fortunate, the process by which people gain civil liberties is different for each person, and the American government will never cease to discriminate against minorities.

Throughout America’s history, we as a society have pushed America towards change in countless ways, resulting in the country we as millennials know today. Most of these instances occurred when people of our country disobeyed the norm and pushed for more rights. As the examples we studied such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi show, peacefully disobeying oppression helps push progress forward more than violence because it brings to light issues in society, shows a level of respect to both sides of the issue, and then allows society to open up debate.