According to Statistic Brain, “A total of about 751,931 non endangered species and 1,041 endangered species of animals are kept in zoos around the world ”. Many of the non endangered animals are capable of living in the wild by themselves, but the more time they spend in zoos the more they will forget about how to survive in the wild and they will also gain many other negative effects. Zoos are more harmful than helpful because they restrict animals to enclosed habitats, they weaken the animals primal instincts, and they cause the animals stress which lead to mental and physical health issues. Animals that cover huge distances in the wild like the lion are constrained to small enclosures in a zoo. Normally the lion will travel about 100 miles around its …show more content…
This is the case with a few higher up zoos who actually prioritise their animals, but for almost all of the others will take care of the animals, but not take care of them after. This means that the animals are taken care of, but they do not take proper care once healed. The higher up zoos will send their healed animals to a sanctuary to reintroduce them to the wild. Whereas the rest will heal the animal to a minimal level and then place them into the zoo or right into the wild, this will cause many problems for the new animal in both situations. If released back into the wild the animal will have trouble surviving and will most likely die an early death. Many will think the right decision would be to place the animal into the zoos care, but the problem with that is that the zoo will treat the animal the animal the same as any other and this will cause the animal stress. If the animal has a broken bone being placed within the zoo is bad because the animal will not get any physical activity to exercise the healed bone causing it to grow in weird and causing the animal
Zoos across the world claim to be safe, suitable homes that replicate habitats of animals that are usually found in the wild. However, there is no possible way for wild habitats to be replicated well enough for animals in captivity to thrive, animals are often separated and withheld from living as they would in the wild. Despite their argument of being educational for visitors, the only thing they are teaching the public is that it is ok to take animals out of the wild and lock them up for their own enjoyment. Regardless of these claims, zoos are inhumane.
Zoos may seem fun to visit and exciting to see the animals; but what you don’t see is the suffering and depression that lies in these helpless creatures. There are many arguments whether or not zoos are good or bad, and if they should be removed or kept. Several think that zoos should be abolished or at least very much improved, due to animal cruelty. While, others want zoos to stay because it is beneficial for the animals and people. I strongly believe that zoos aren’t good for both the public and animals for numerous reasons.
Being placed in a zoo can dramatically help endangered animals receive the care that they need which may not be accessible in the wild. In William Dudley’s Animal Rights, author John Ironmonger was quoted as saying, “Certainly, zoo animals do tend to live longer lives, to feed better, and to suffer from fewer parasites or diseases. They live without fear of predation; they live without famine” (72-73). His quote supports the argument that endangered animals are provided for in captivity. In the wild, animals under threat of extinction fear starvation, poachers, disease, and predators. Placing these animals in zoos can give them rehabilitation and a perseverance of their lives. Another author, Kevin Hile, supports the claim that endangered animals are preserved in zoos by discussing the evolution of zoos. When zoos first started, they were merely used to bring in revenue. Now, zoos play a role in helping save endangered animals from extinction (Hile 133). Zoos
Although wild animals are anything but free from disease or injury, it is a more significant problem for them in captivity. According to Stephen Bostock, author of “Zoos and Animal Rights”, “the stress of being captured and transported can make an animal more liable to serious,” infection (67). He also mentions how the conditions in zoos can assist in the spread of infections and parasites (67). In addition to this, animals can be exposed to disease they would not normally face in the wild, diseases that they have no immunity built against. For example, primates catch tuberculosis and measles from humans and Antarctic penguins often die from aspergillosis as a result of not living in their natural aseptic environment (Bostock, 67). So even though zoo animals may be healthier in ways such as less minor injuries, the gap between them and their wild counterparts is not as big as people perceive. Elephants are
Animals being caged, hit, poked, and prodded is a normal part of circus and zoo life. Wild animals are not meant to be a form of entertainment, and should not be our captives unless necessary for their health. P.T. Barnum opened what became arguably one of the most controversial circuses in modern times in 1871, and three years later, America’s first zoo followed. In the past one hundred years, very few things have changed in the way animals in such establishments are treated and trained.
If the population of Earth was dying, would it be better for someone to help regenerate the population? If people were hunting you down for parts of your body, would you want to be protected? What about the chance to live a longer life because you were cared for? Many years ago, zoos were cruel and abusive to animals that came, but ever since then zoos have changed to become more habitable for the animals. Before we became a safe haven for animals, we were just people wanting to collect them and put them in cages. Although zoos can be bad for animals, animals should stay in zoos because they are protected from hunters and predators, decreases the population of endangered species, and the animals live longer.
Since the time that the first zoo was created, all that people wanted to see was how animals lived. They were gifted to Kings and Queens and Emperors as presents for celebrations. While that might have been the reasoning then, it is not the case now. Wild animals are captured and trained to preform tricks at the hand of their trainers. Now, since the Animal Rights movement, animals have gotten better care and better habitats. Animals have been looked upon as a source of entertainment and a way to educate the public, although their welfare has improved the animals still suffer by being in tiny cages. Although some scientists argue that caging does not have long term effects on the animals, most still believe that being in enclosures is detrimental
Did you know that if you keep animals in zoos they have a higher chance of survival? Also, they give them the medical help they need.In my opinion, zoos are a good place for little animals to grow so if they get severley bad they get the medical help they might need.Most animals grow thier speciesin zoos and many people can see there favorite animal and also can learn about their animal.The focus of this paper is how to keep the animals off the endangered list,the zoo keeper give them the medical help when needed,and they also let people see and learn about their favorite animal. The purpose for this writing piece is to persuade you to keep animals in zoos.
There are many different types of zoos, ranging from small, half-abandoned collections of animals to huge, seemingly extravagant homes for these wonderful creatures. Most can agree that small, for-profit zoos aren’t okay. But what about the big, ‘non-profit’ zoos? The ones that are supposedly only meant to help endangered animals? In reality, more than half of zoo animals are not endangered at all, but instead captive to draw crowds (One Green Planet 2015). As for the animals that are endangered, zoos tend to only house the popular species, including animals such as tigers and elephants. Most endangered species are not chosen by zoos because they are not as popular, so they won’t attract as many visitors (One Green Planet 2015).
A family is enjoying a trip to their local zoo when they stop to look at the tigers. The child sprints over to exhibit with excitement; he notices a red sign stuck the glass of the enclosure which reads, Endangered. “Daddy, if the zoo is keeping the tigers in a cage in order to save them, when will they let them back into the wild to live free?” Based on statistics from public zoos across America, the unfortunate answer to this question is a resounding ‘”Never.” It has become noticeably evident that zoos are not a current resource for the protection of rare and endangered species. Animals should not be kept in zoos, because they fail at the conservation of animal species, provide little or no education about habitat and the behavior of animals, and harm the animals physically and mentally.
The habitats in zoos are serious in their lack of concern and can create harm for the animals that live there. Zoos in the 21st century are drawing in many visitors all around the world every year. While ticket sales are increasing for zoos, the number of animals are slowly diminishing over time. Due to the practices
On average about 175 million people visit a zoo per year. However, the majority of these people fail to notice a relative issue that is lying in front of their faces. That these animals within these zoos are suffering every day from mistreatment and abuse. Most of the society ignores the many factors that have been revealed to them every time they enter a zoo. Instead, society focuses in on issues that are happening right now, the issues that draw out the media and are on the cover of every newspaper. However, these animals facing this mistreatment are relevant and do impact society. Every time an animal is taken from the wild and placed in the captivity of a zoo it impacts the mental health of the animal and endangers everyone and everything around it. Zoos are to blame for this endangerment, yet so is the public for overlooking mistreatment such as an early death in animals, mental illness, and being imported illegally from the wild.
Zoos are not effective in helping endangered or threatened animals, because regardless of the circumstances, confinement cannot reproduce wild animals’ habitats. In this essay I will look at the disadvantages of zoos based on economics, education and the effect it has on threatened and endangered animals.
There is more than meets the eye when you go to visit a zoo. Zoos are painted as a fun and cheerful place people all over the world love to go and visit; they are simply for entertainment. These animals that make the zoo possible are stripped of their freedom and value of life so they can be used for entertainment by hundreds of people daily. The animals are thought of more like couches; sitting and waiting to be moved around from place to place until we grow old of them and “throw them out”. Leaving zoos to have a negative effect on the well-being of animals.
Animals are put in captivity for animal conservation, and to educate the public about how important it is to keep these animals alive. It is often argued that zoos are a bad place to put animals, but studies have shown how endangered animals are better off in a zoo environment. Animals that go extinct in the wild around the world are shown to have a successful life in zoos. Even though some zoos have a bad reputation, they are actually really beneficial for wildlife conservation. The purpose of a zoo is to conserve animal life, but instead, zoos are being used for people’s entertainment rather than educational purposes (Keulartz 2015). Zoos protect animal species, especially endangered animals, from other harmful and poisonous species. Zoos are full of reptiles, amphibians, mammals, etc. Zoos also give people a chance to see animals they might not ever get to see out in the wild. Zookeepers have to go through a specific learning process on how to treat the animals correctly, and how to care for them.