Pierre Brent Case

In mid-1999, a student by the name of B.J. Durham transferred schools as a result of his mother’s divorce and financial struggles. B.J. was a cross-country/track star at his previous school, Park Tudor Private High School, and was rumored to be moving for athletically-motivated reasons. Because of the hearsay, B.J. was not granted full-eligibility by the IHSAA but partial. B.J., the plaintiff in this case, was also denied access to the Hardship Exception which would’ve granted him athletic eligibility in full. B.J. and his family took their case to court. The court issued a permanent injunction against the IHSAA’s decision, to which the IHSAA later appealed. The court stood on their decision,

CASE CITATION: Kurt HOME and Brenda Home, husband and wife, Appellants, v. NORTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent.NORTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. JOHN GRAHAM ASSOCIATES, Third-Party Defendants. No. 21696-5-II. (1998)

reported it to the school board. The school board pointed their finger at the state. The State Board

Grove College City issued a lawsuit against the ED saying that they could not stop the financial aid of the students based on the refusal to sign the Assurance of Compliance form. A federal trial court agreed, but they soon turned in favor to the ED, and Grove College City took the case to the Supreme Court.   When Supreme Court reviewed the case they agreed that the ED had the right to act considering that the BEOGs were federal funds, and they also agreed that the TITLE IX

I am writing to make a Complaint against Millsaps College. Please find enclosed the letter written to Millsaps College President. My complaint is Millsaps College in violation of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) failed to preserve my educational record. As an act of bad faith the College failed to disclose to me that my records were not preserved and failed to ask if I had any documents which proved my claim.

His future recommendations stated that getting into some sort of coaching or administrator work so you can understand how to manage individuals and the craziness that comes with supervision is beneficial. However he also said that getting your foot in the door with any job/opportunity can change the process of achieving the goal of becoming an

E. The Petitioner properly claimed the education credit in respect of his son, Silas, a full time enrolled student at Des

The hearing panel met three or four time during the period of April 19, 2010 and May 3, 2010. Brown did not appear before the panel during this time. On May 3, the hearing panel issued their dismissal of the academic misconduct claim again Brown because it did not violate a specific university rule. However, the panel noted that Brown’s application and letter of certification made clear that he could potentially be expelled for any withholding or false information. By signing the application, Brown acknowledged the law school’s right to dismiss him for false information on his application. Thus, the decision was left to Dean Gail Agrawal, who consulted with the University’s Office of General Counsel. She sent Brown a letter on May 26, 2010, notifying him of the intent to dismiss him effective June 8, 2010 for “falsification, misrepresentation, and failure to supply complete, accurate, and

I have sought assistance from you and your staff for months regarding the retaliation, harassment, and misconduct committed by Daniel Bayes, Director of Bayes Achievement Center; a TEA Certified Non-Public School. Twice I have received notice from TEA dated August 22, 2017 which incorrectly indicated that “TEA only has jurisdiction over public school districts or charter schools” and October 3, 2017 that due to your offices contractual failures “TEA lacks authority” to investigate Bayes Achievement Center’s violations of federal and state special education law.

This Court should deny the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend because the statute of limitations has ran on his claims and the amendment does not relate back to the original complaint under 15(c). Plaintiff, Pourya Shahmaleki, filed a complaint against Kansas State University under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 30, 2015, a few days before the statute of limitations ran out. After the

Given the aforementioned facts, it is indisputable that I was a victim of RETALIATION, PERSONAL VENGEANCE, and FRAUD by Ms. Lopez. Given my documented psychiatric disabilities, this incident occurred because I unintentionally created animosity with Ms. Lopez by declining her UNETHICAL and INAPPROPRIATE DEMAND to complete her son’s homework. As a DIRECT RESULT of this PHYSICAL, FINANCIAL, and PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA inflicted upon me by Ms. Lopez, I am suffering from severe Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) (I have official disability documentation), and I have nightmares every night regarding this traumatic event. I am unable to go to sleep at night. My brain keeps remembering this traumatic event as if it occurred yesterday; all the details keep replaying in my mind on a constant basis. Thus, I MUST take action as soon as possible to resolve my psychological trauma and prevent further damages. No university official should be permitted to inflict this type of trauma upon a student, especially not a disabled student.

In Michael Gonchar’s New York Times article “Should a College Education Be Free,” he is discussing President Obama’s proposal to allow college free for students attending community colleges. In the article Gronchar states that in order for the suggestion to work the federal government would have to comply. Considering the fact that the government is not the type to hand out money, people were stating that this is merely an opinion rather than fact. However, the president ecstatically acknowledged that the proposal will proceed and that the government would pay three-quarters of the cost. The presidents’ action had triggered a numerous amount of questions such as “What money is this coming from?” including “Should college be

My daughter was enrolled in Ursuline Academy and was test out of Kindergarten into first grade in an accredited top ranked school known as Ridgewood Preparatory. Immediate I contacted Ursuline Academy in person after daughter attended one day of school. I was told in-person by the new business office manager that they would prorated the two days of attendance towards her previous payments. Next, I meet with the elemenatary deparment and I told her about the current situation. I mentioned to her the business office is going to prorate my daughters two days of attendance and refund the balance. Since Ursuline Acacdmy could not uphold their current contract of accessing children according to their abilities. Their false advertisment of accessing

There was not a real choice for the parents unless they researched on their own and use a different method of negotiation. However, the parents kept the negotiation method as explained by Fisher and Ury (2011), “the soft negotiation game emphasizes the importance of building and maintaining a relationship” (p. 9). They knew that if they were unsuccessful while defending their claims, the district could not pay Jerry’s education. However, they did not know all the rights that they had available to fight the decision.

When he asked for his daughter to have an alternative assignment, he was told no. When he informed the school that it was a violation of the Constitution to force his daughter to violate her religious beliefs for an