Pierre Brent Case

I have sought assistance from you and your staff for months regarding the retaliation, harassment, and misconduct committed by Daniel Bayes, Director of Bayes Achievement Center; a TEA Certified Non-Public School. Twice I have received notice from TEA dated August 22, 2017 which incorrectly indicated that “TEA only has jurisdiction over public school districts or charter schools” and October 3, 2017 that due to your offices contractual failures “TEA lacks authority” to investigate Bayes Achievement Center’s violations of federal and state special education law.

CASE CITATION: Kurt HOME and Brenda Home, husband and wife, Appellants, v. NORTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent.NORTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. JOHN GRAHAM ASSOCIATES, Third-Party Defendants. No. 21696-5-II. (1998)

This Court should deny the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend because the statute of limitations has ran on his claims and the amendment does not relate back to the original complaint under 15(c). Plaintiff, Pourya Shahmaleki, filed a complaint against Kansas State University under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 30, 2015, a few days before the statute of limitations ran out. After the

In mid-1999, a student by the name of B.J. Durham transferred schools as a result of his mother’s divorce and financial struggles. B.J. was a cross-country/track star at his previous school, Park Tudor Private High School, and was rumored to be moving for athletically-motivated reasons. Because of the hearsay, B.J. was not granted full-eligibility by the IHSAA but partial. B.J., the plaintiff in this case, was also denied access to the Hardship Exception which would’ve granted him athletic eligibility in full. B.J. and his family took their case to court. The court issued a permanent injunction against the IHSAA’s decision, to which the IHSAA later appealed. The court stood on their decision,

in each case involving imposition of a penalty or sanction, the accused , Christopher Booz, shall have the right to appeal the decision. This appeal is written and shall be delivered to the vice president for Student Affairs, the hearing officers, the adjudicatory body, and the president of the University- within 5 class days following the decision by the hearing officer or the assistant vice president for Student Affairs. As a student, I have not forfeit the right to any appeal or fail to file an appeal within the 5 class day period. This appeal to the vice president for Student Affairs is made on the following grounds: Lack of due process, i.e., when a student can show an error in the hearing; or arbitrariness in finding against the weight of the evidence, lack of substantial evidence, evidence that was not considered or available that would subsequently change the nature of the case.

Did the trial court err in its determination that, under the Child Support Guidelines, as provided in § 12-204(i)(1), that the Defendant should contribute to private school via his child support payment

His future recommendations stated that getting into some sort of coaching or administrator work so you can understand how to manage individuals and the craziness that comes with supervision is beneficial. However he also said that getting your foot in the door with any job/opportunity can change the process of achieving the goal of becoming an

I am writing to make a Complaint against Millsaps College. Please find enclosed the letter written to Millsaps College President. My complaint is Millsaps College in violation of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) failed to preserve my educational record. As an act of bad faith the College failed to disclose to me that my records were not preserved and failed to ask if I had any documents which proved my claim.

The Plaintiff filed suit on April 7, 2015, in Livingston Parish for a 2004 loan made to Mr. Hollis through the CFS Private Education Undergraduate Loan Program by Charter One Bank, N.A. for $26,484.00 with a “Deferral Period Margin of 4.85, Repayment Period Margin of 4.85” and a Loan Origination Fee Percentage of 9.5.

On November 9, 2015, he received a letter from the Social Security Administration stating that he in the arrears of $1,226.89 retroactive that he had to pay back which he thought that was the money that the state refund was for. In addition, $183.60 was deducted from his Social Security Disability benefits on novemb34 9, 2015 and $461.30 from his checks on December 3, 2015, January 3, 2016, and February 3, 2016. On February 1, 2016, he received a letter from the Department of Treasury stating that $145.67 was taken from his Office of Personnel Management (OPM)

Grove College City issued a lawsuit against the ED saying that they could not stop the financial aid of the students based on the refusal to sign the Assurance of Compliance form. A federal trial court agreed, but they soon turned in favor to the ED, and Grove College City took the case to the Supreme Court.   When Supreme Court reviewed the case they agreed that the ED had the right to act considering that the BEOGs were federal funds, and they also agreed that the TITLE IX

This resulted in another student not qualifying when he should have. This act relates to when

My daughter was enrolled in Ursuline Academy and was test out of Kindergarten into first grade in an accredited top ranked school known as Ridgewood Preparatory. Immediate I contacted Ursuline Academy in person after daughter attended one day of school. I was told in-person by the new business office manager that they would prorated the two days of attendance towards her previous payments. Next, I meet with the elemenatary deparment and I told her about the current situation. I mentioned to her the business office is going to prorate my daughters two days of attendance and refund the balance. Since Ursuline Acacdmy could not uphold their current contract of accessing children according to their abilities. Their false advertisment of accessing

There was not a real choice for the parents unless they researched on their own and use a different method of negotiation. However, the parents kept the negotiation method as explained by Fisher and Ury (2011), “the soft negotiation game emphasizes the importance of building and maintaining a relationship” (p. 9). They knew that if they were unsuccessful while defending their claims, the district could not pay Jerry’s education. However, they did not know all the rights that they had available to fight the decision.

When he asked for his daughter to have an alternative assignment, he was told no. When he informed the school that it was a violation of the Constitution to force his daughter to violate her religious beliefs for an