Planet of the Apes Essay

When it comes to apes, monkeys, gorillas, etc., in visual and literary works of art we really get both ends of the spectrum. We see them as childlike in Curious George and we also see them as loving and compassionate and very much a community in Tarzan. I wouldn’t count Tarzan as portraying them as advanced because they can verbally speak, just because of the fact that in the majority of Disney movies there is at least one talking animal. I would count Planet of the Apes though for showing them as advanced creatures. In Planet of the Apes you see them performing very human like tasks in a research facility like we saw in the video that was assigned this week. The conditions of the lab in the movie were quite awful though and opposite from

The book I chose was “Planets Without Apes” by Craig B. Stanford. The book was published by The Belknap Press (Harvard) by Harvard University Press, in 2013. I think that the book was a good factual read and that there was a lot of good information but with that said, I think it was a bit jumbled with too much information. I say this because there are many, many different large ideas. It is like a tree with the trunk being the idea of a planet without apes and off the trunk are the branches which symbolize the smaller information about what would happen without apes then off of the branches are the leaves which are small little bits of information that all resemble the idea of what would happen with a planet without apes. The way that Stanford portrays his information is great but eventually can be hard to follow.

40) {11.10}Some people argue that we should eat lower on the food chain. Describe these reasons. Others argue that this is a generalization with some exceptions. What is their position?

My claim would be that science, society, and religion constantly contradict each other. During the time period of the scientific revolution, we see how society worships an independent view, along with religious views agree with/encourage sciences or demean scientific ideas entirely.

When dwelling into the explorations about science and religion, one can find it quite amusing. "If science and religion are to continue to coexist it seems opposed to the conditions of modern thought to admit that this result can be brought about by the so-called

Once there was a big monkey that lived in the jungle and he ruled all the other monkeys. This monkey was not a regular monkey he was the Ape god. This monkey had two sides to him he had his side were he was nice to the other monkeys then he had his times were he would bully the other monkeys. He would never actually kill any of the animals of the monkeys except for one reason and that reason was if they were supreme.

Science and religion might be translated as different impressions of a similar source, and it is distortions in those reflections that prompt to chaos and misery. Religion and science both have defects that can imperil human progress if they do not acknowledge each other’s elementary principles. "Religion is not only dangerous and misleading but…sentient beings are generally too weak-willed to reject it” (269). When one acknowledges either science or religion with no endeavor to accommodate the two productively, the final result is normally disastrous. At the point when scientists and theologians take part in battle for the absolute entirety of people, nobody wins, but when they engage in dialogue, the fruits are enormous.

There once lived this big, mean King of the Apes he was so mean and cruel. In the great anthropoids. The older apes who has had come into his path moved and hid their families just so they won’t get affected by the crudeness of the king. The other apes who wasn’t scared of the king wanted him out as king and they wanted him dead. One of the apes mustered up some courage to go against the king, he had the whole tribe there with him to back him up if he needed any help. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

There is set ways that humans are perceived to act and its broadened into many types of personalities and characteristics. Humans are expected to follow some sort of destiny pulled by an ultimate force and the will to live. Monkey is a story that follows four unlikely individuals on their episodic journey to the west to receive scriptures from the buddha. During the journey the reader can clearly pull out distinct aspects of human nature from three of the characters. The three characteristics that can easily be represented are wisdom, restlessness, and greed. In all, these can be used to help explain the characteristics of human nature represented in monkey.

1.Is the “species line” that the great ape project drawn morally justifiable? From a moral standpoint I personally do not believe that it can justified. Pretend that for a minute chimpanzees can think rationally on there own, what makes us any better than them? The answer is because we as humans say we are. Lets take a mentally handicapped person for example and compare him to an ape. If the ape is more functional and has more cognitive abilities then the human does that mean the human should be treated less in a moral sense? Unless you are siding with Peter Singer the answer is no. I believe the line for legal and moral rights should not be drawn based on species membership but rather on the cognitive criteria and the ability to be self-aware

Around five to seven million years ago in Africa, a man/ape primate ventured about in the wooded areas. (Morgan, 1982) “My thesis is that a branch of this primitive ape-stock was forced by competition from life in the trees to feed on the sea-shores and to hunt for food, shellfish, sea-urchins etc.”, quoted from Alister Hardy. For the need of food, shelter, space, and resources, the hominid relocated from its traditional environment of the tree, toward water. As evident today, many species of monkeys and apes seek these resources in trees. According to Elaine Morgan, the man/ape primates that stayed and continued to survive in the wooded environment millions of years ago, are the direct ancestors of today’s monkey and ape primates, while

No environment will ever stay strange for Man. Man is built to last, adapt, and progress. “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change”-Charles Darwin. In Pierre Boulle’s novel, Planet of The Apes, the characters are faced with the dilemma of having to adjust to the culture and lifestyle of the inhabitants on the planet Soror. Boulle demonstrates that man can assimilate to any environment one finds themselves in, no matter how displaced they are.

From lavish to savage is the underlying scheme in Edgar Rice Burroughs Tarzan of The Apes and his short story The Land That Time Forgot. These two works were widely read in Edgar Rice Burroughs’ time period, especially during World War I as he describes the racism during this time period. He particularly describes how the British were set aside and betrayed as the bad, but unknowingly the good. In these two works he tries to explain throughout his novels the level of racism between the Germans and the British. Racism is demonstrated in Tarzan of the Apes as civilized verses savage (being raised by wild animals).

English film actor and author Andy Serkis is obviously returning as ape leader Caesar, and just last month, it has been said that the two-time Academy Award nominee - Woody Harrelson has come on board for 'War for the Planet of the Apes' to play as a human antagonist.

The hypothesis that the apes might be able to communicate is being under consideration as there is no enough evidence of it. Researchers such as Koko or Michael apes ones are introduced as an evidence of apes acquisition of communication. But according to the lecturer to define the person capacity to communicate, we should consider some important factors. First of all, the existence of a language, the act of taking each way, emotion response to what is being said. This behaviour was not seen during the conducted experiments. This is being criticized by the researchers by saying that actually we do not know how apes behave as we do not spend much time with them. in this case another problem occurs. How does the emotion status of the researcher