2.6 Change Management
Policy change management refers to making amendments to policies in a systematic manner. It also encompasses all responses channelled towards a cause of change which may be beyond the control of the organization’s management or may be needed to either sure the success of the policy or reduce the impact of the failure (The Pathfinder Project, 2003). It is without any contradiction that in this dynamic environment, polices cannot be rigid due to a series of factors such as new legislation, social unrest, commodity prices that may impact positively or negatively on the environment. This assertion is even strengthened by the fact that policies cannot exist independently from intervening variables. This section will not
…show more content…
Change within the policy process could also be responsive to triggers of change within the system. Managing the change that may happen during the policy process from policy initiation to its implementation help ensure that the policy succeed. The implementation is particularly more important as it is the aspect that “gets the job done”.
Even the most detailed policy implementation plan may still be subjected to changes due to sometimes anticipated but often unplanned outcome of a complex of many decisions structured at different levels and sometimes power distribution between groups involved in the various stages of implementing the policy (Terpstra & Havinga 2001). According to (Sutton 1999), the policy process research is a combination of the study of stability and change (transformation or flexibility). Stability: because a strong and robust system is needed to bring about desirable outcomes and change: because there must be a response to continuing changing demands of end users and the environment. Stability may be the enemy of change but stability itself must be brought about by a preceding change and so is a function of change. Grote (2009) puts it beautifully asserting that: organisations have had to continuously adjust the balance between stability and flexibility in order to
The policy cycle suggested by Althaus, Bridgman and Davis consists of a continuous wheel which nominally begins with the task of 'identifying issues ' and progresses through 'policy analysis ', 'policy instruments ', consultation ', 'coordination ', 'decision ', 'implementation ' and 'evaluation ' before beginning the cycle again (Althaus et al 2013: 37-40). The authors admit that policy rarely actually follows this model sequentially in the steps outlined above and is really meant as more of a guide to good policy, rather than an evaluation of actual practice (Althaus et al 2013: 40-42).
Once the plans are put in motion interventions are designed to gain the necessary compliance. The manager needs to provide information by doing so he can change an individual’s perception, attitudes and values this is a plus for the manager. Training the employees to the new way will give them information and skill practice it show them how to perform in a system not how to change it. When possible the manager should use groups to discuss issues that are perceived as important and make relevant, binding decisions based on these discussions. Individual and group implementation can be combined so whatever methods are used participants should feel their input is valued and should be rewarded for their efforts. In some cases people are not always persuaded before beneficial change is implemented, sometimes behavior changes first and attitudes are modified later to fit the behavior (Sullivan & Decker, 2009, p. 71).
When organisations want to implement change they need to have a plan, taking into consideration existing information that leads to the change, stakeholders views have to be followed for successful implementation, the public views is important, service user’s expectations have to be met by appointing a service team.
Change is inevitable, and in the event of change taking place, some issues need to be addressed to make the necessary steps towards the attainment of the change that people want. In the view of what happens, there should be some hidden yet strong force that pushes
The issue with planned change is the misconception that outcomes are foreseeable, when in reality, the idea of control and predictability are impossible in a complex adaptive system. By its very nature a complex system is constantly in flux with multiple moving parts and pieces that function independently, yet are symbiotic.
| One of the main learning points that I read was that communication needed to be thorough and maintained through the course of the changes to ensure that complacency didn’t set in or any regression in the implementation of the changes. Another is that consideration should be given to the concerns of the individuals that will be directly affected. It is important to note these because these are sometimes the breaking points for an unsuccessful implementation. Especially considering the individuals affected, it so simple just a little extra time understanding how and what the change will affect will ease the process in the
Leading and managing change require a solid theoretical foundation. This assignment will research the theoretical elements of change and change management. Addressed will be the following: Organic Evolution of Change, Formulating Strategic Development Approaches, Leadership and Management Skills and Gathering and Analyze Data. As societies continue to evolve and changing demand creates the need for new products and services, businesses often are forced to make changes to stay competitive. The businesses that continue to survive and even thrive are usually the ones that most readily adapt to change. A variety of factors can cause a business to reevaluate its methods of operation. According to literature from the past two
The “Change Management Simulation: Power and Influence” worked through a 96-week initiative to get Spectrum Sunglasses to adopt a new sustainable output. The goal was to convince the team that a dramatic change in the organization’s strategy and products were necessary, and that environmental sustainability was critical to the company’s future. The move for Spectrum Sunglass Company to move to greener techniques was largely radical because it impacts so many different parts of the organization- Manufacturing procedure, culture and ethos, target marketing- to name a few. Through the weeks of attempting to get the entire organization to adopt the new initiative I was faced with a variety of choices to use. While there was no specific order in which to use them, the ability to use the right decisions at the correct time was pivotal to gaining support and building the organization through a new and challenging enterprise.
Policy evaluation goes through a series of questioning of how the policy identified and implemented the desired effect and the possibility of modifications to produce efficiencies. For example, during an evaluation, data collected is in constant use from previous monitoring. In monitoring, emphasis is placed on results and processes that are derived from procedural implementation. These two overarching components of a policy constantly work together to form any type of adjustments needed for policy effectiveness and efficiency (Capturing Experience Monitoring and Evaluation, 1988).
“Policies and procedures are like a state road map. The map at a glance shows areas of interest and the general direction in which to travel to reach a desired estimation. The roads on the map provide possible paths to reach a particular destination. If the correct roads are followed, the destination can be
The following critique is written for the reflection review of change management. The report proceeds with a review of each question that was assigned as well as presents a brief exploration of my experience and ideas that were acquired from taking change management classes.
1.1 Change management is described by Armstrong (1) as “the process of achieving the smooth implementation of change by planning and introducing it systematically taking into account the likelihood of it being resisted”. Change, the fundamental constant in any successful organisation, can be adaptive, reconstructive, revolutionary or evolutionary and can happen for a number of diverse reasons:
The agents analyze the gaps and run the change effectively with standard metrics. Effective change agents involve actively in the change implementation process in short run and for long-term follow up. On the flip side, this alternative demands considerable financial investments from BA.
Policy cycle is a valuable device for new policy development. It is a tool which divides complex procedures into convenient and manageable steps. These individual steps provides a frame work andantedates any forthcoming issues related to policy development. However, as Althaus, Bridgman & Davis (2013) said these steps are not stages that have to be followed in a same manner they are to help policy developers to individually assess, evaluate, process and provides room for corrections. These steps are flexible enough to incorporate any changes at the time of new policy development and as a part of continuous change once it is implemented. Colebatch (2006) said that changes are necessary for the use of contemporary information to reshape and review of any policy to achieve desirable outcome. Hence policy making is known as an ongoing process which represent its cyclic nature.