The subject of one’s job is a common inquiry as others are curious whether or not someone is satisfied with their work, if they actually enjoy what they do for a living, and if one’s job holds a significant meaning for them in their life. The notion of job satisfaction, in conjunction with personal well-being, has steered many human resource directors and social psychology researchers to perform in-depth reviews and studies regarding the correlation between these two topics, thus helping this matter forge ahead in the field of psychology. In the journal article titled Predicting Job Satisfaction: A New Perspective on Person-Environment Fit (2014), Erin Hardin and James Donaldson hypothesized the plausibility of two distinct factors that might play a role with regard to person-job/environment fit and job satisfaction which were, ideal-job actualization and actual-job regard (Hardin & Donaldson, p. 635). Although the two researchers added their unique flavor to their study, there were items that could potentially be viewed as bias. With respect to the article and a Biblical world view, there was not an outright association between the two, but there could be an alignment in relation to concepts regarding how one views themselves in relation to their job, and the impact of counseling. Hardin and Donaldson’s (2014) general intent was to ultimately explore the two factors which, they coined as ideal-job actualization and actual-job regard which, stemmed from the notions
Organizations that are serious about making improvements are going to have to deal with the issue of job satisfaction. Job satisfaction can be best described as the positive feeling that an individual has about their job resulting from an evaluation of the job’s characteristics (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p.31). It would seem natural to think that job satisfaction would have a positive correlation with successful organizations. What impact does job satisfaction have on an organization? Research will show that there are not only internal effects from performance related issues, but also external effects that impact customer satisfaction.
Robbins and Judge define "attitudes" as “evaluative statements or judgments concerning objects, people, or events.” Jessica’s attitudes towards her job switched from favorable to unfavorable after a change in policy. Henceforth, she was less productive in her job and expressed signs of low job satisfaction. After leaving her Mental Health Technician position for a job in Counseling, she was able to return to her normal, happy and productive self. This case study illuminates the direct correlation between job performance, job satisfaction, and attitude.
As we learned in Organizational Behavior, people constantly search for job satisfaction and psychological happiness at work. People want to pursue a career the way that they want, and be happy every day at work. In chapter three, it describes five major job attitudes: satisfaction, involvement, psychological empowerment, organizational commitment, and employee engagement. It 's ideal to transition from just being satisfied to eventually becoming a fully engaged employee. Engaged employees demonstrate characteristics of loyalty, involvement, enthusiasm, and passion for their job. The book also describes major stages one ideally goes through as their career progresses. One should start as a satisfied employee where they perform all of their requirements but do not go above and beyond. As they progress, they will become more motivated employees where they start to strive for personal goals, then committed in which they are loyal to the organization and engage in collaboration. Lastly, the most ideal stage is to become an advocate in the organization which is someone who is proactive, challenges themselves, cares about the organization, and encourages innovation. As we learned, a proactive personality is an exemplary trait, as these employees will identify opportunities, take action, and persevere until change occurs. At Bloomberg, they strive to create an environment in which each individual can grow and pursue a career in which they
In this study, job satisfaction will be operationalized using selected items from the 18-item Index of Job Satisfaction (IJS) developed by Brayfield & Rothe (1951). A 5-point Likert scale will be used to measure the outcomes ranging from the lowest indication of job satisfaction as 1 (strongly disagree) to the highest indication of job satisfaction 5 (strongly agree). This will
Workers who are not achieving job satisfaction put in their time without any passion or energy. Employees who are not satisfied in their jobs tends to undermine the accomplishments of their co-workers. Some individuals may develop meaning from the opportunities they are afforded because of the job, and not from the job itself. Others may find the job as a means of advancing themselves and thereby becoming the best possible them. Individuals who indulge in craftsmanship may take pride in having executed a thoroughly complete job. While those in the service industry may find purpose in the thought or belief structure up on which their work is built. Others may derive meaning from the sense of affiliation they share with
The concept of job satisfaction is not new; the Bible says “There is nothing better for man than to eat, drink, and enjoy his work.” (Ecclesiastes 2:24a, Holman Christian Standard Bible) However, Job satisfaction in today’s workforce is more complicated than just enjoying your work. Being satisfied with your job quite simply implies that an employee feels positively about their job. Alternatively, job dissatisfaction is feeling negatively about one’s job. (Robbins, et al. 79) Job satisfaction and dissatisfaction is based on personal opinions, job tempo has a profound affect on those sentiments.
When a person comes to work each day, they are required to perform their job duties to the best of their ability. However, how a person performs these duties each day depends on how much they like or dislike their occupation. Job satisfaction affects job performance and turnover rates. “Job satisfaction essentially reflects the extent to which an individual likes his or her job. Formally defined, job satisfaction is an effective or emotional response toward various facets on one’s job (Kinicki & Fugate, 2016, pg. 57).” It is possible a person only likes part of his or her job though. Job satisfaction has five predominant models. These models are: was need fulfillment met, are expectations met, values, equity (fairness), and dispositional/ genetic components. Job satisfaction also affects attitudes and
The Value Percept Theory argues that job satisfaction depends on whether a job supplies the things an individual value most. Overall satisfactions derive form combined levels of satisfaction from various elements of an individual’s job, whether it’s: pay, promotion, supervision, coworkers, or the work itself. Job satisfaction is based on cognitive and affective components, which is evaluated by what an individual thinks about the job, and how they feel. Cognition evaluation is based on experiences, weighing different aspects of a job; as affect is a reaction of the job, which can fluctuate based on moods and emotions. Level of dissatisfaction is measured by the difference between what one has and what one wants, and the level of importance of that facet to the individual. Statistics have proven, that supplying individuals with what they value, will increase the chance of better performance, which has a high correlation with an individual’s affective commitment with the organization.
Based on the philosophical assumptions in the seminal works, a person is stated to always be developing and dynamic, is motivated within their occupations, and is constantly interacting with their environment (Law, Cooper, Strong, Stewart, Rigby, & Letts, 1996). The way a person defines themselves will influence the person’s actions within their environment and how it is carried out through their occupational performance. While some qualities are more responsive than others, almost all of the
The job characteristics model is one of the most influential attempts to design jobs with increased motivational properties. Proposed by Hackman and Oldham, the model describes five core job dimensions leading to three critical psychological states, resulting in work-related outcomes.
Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences. It has been treated both as a general attitude and satisfaction with five specific dimensions of the job: pay, the work itself, promotion opportunities, supervision, and coworkers. Challenging work, valued rewards, opportunities for advancement, competent supervision, and supportive coworkers are dimensions of the job that can lead to satisfaction (Nelson & Quick, 2013, pg.
Job satisfaction can be known to some people as an important element in their lives. If an individual is unhappy with their occupation it may affect other parts of their life. Job satisfaction can be seen in what one wants in a job as to what one has in their current job.
The relationship between job satisfaction, motivation, and efficiency or productivity is very important in the business industry as well as in personal life. Long term research has found that the single greatest predictor of longevity is work satisfaction. Work is one third to one half of a persons' lifetime, and if frustrated the mental and physical effects are very costly. Job characteristics including skill variety, task identity, and task significance lead to psychological conditions in which in turn leads to increased motivation, performance and job satisfaction. It is important to investigate this area in order to determine how much of an effect does
Job satisfaction is the very important factor in general quality of life because it is closely connected with working life (e.g. Argyle, 1989; Bang & Lee, 2006), with family life, everyday life, and mental health (Orpen, 1978; Schmitt and Bedeian, 1982; Faragher, Cass & Cooper, 2005). Level of job satisfaction is also highly related to turnover, absenteeism rate, work productivity or accomplishment (Muchinsky, 1977; Organ, 1977). Many researchers (e.g. Cherrington, 1994; Acorn, Ratner & Crawford, 1997; Ostroff, 1992; Spector, 1997) state that employees who experience high job satisfaction contribute to organisational commitment, job involvement, their physical, mental health and overall well-being are improved. Job dissatisfaction on the
Dissatisfied and satisfied employees in the workplace can affect their productive and job performance. The work place, promotions, advancements, and supervisors are things that can cause an employee to be satisfied or dissatisfied at work. In my workplace some of my supervisors have driven my attitude. Robbins (2007) states, “attitudes are evaluative statements-either favorable or unfavorable-about objects, people or events.” (Robbins and Judge, 2007, p. 75) When I was first promoted to Sergeant and transferred to supervisor the Criminal Investigations Unit, I was excited about the new opportunity and the knowledge I would learn and give. My attitude towards the workplace and towards my employees was high and willing to help or produce a positive work environment. As a Christian in a non-Christian workplace, a great attitude towards job satisfaction can be found in the Bible. In Ecclesiastes 5:18 (New Living Translation), it says, “I have noticed one thing, at least, that is good. It is good for people to eat, drink, and enjoy their work under the sun and during the short life God has given them.” The workplace can be stressful but when you have good leadership they can effectively change the attitude of the people they serve.