President Bush’s Second Inaugural Address Essays

In President Bush’s Address to the Nation Speech the day after September 11 (9/11) in 2001, President Bush wants to inform the country of this tragic event and what was going to happen for the country. President Bush uses rhetorical devices to captures the audience’s attention and to reach this purpose. President Bush mainly use pathos, logos, anaphoras, and personifications to achieve his purpose.

Bush uses appeals throughout his formal speech to help advance the argument he proposes. While doing this Bush takes his listeners on a roller coaster of emotion, appealing to pathos and to logos, then to ethos and back to

Bush uses the first few paragraphs of his speech to introduce several of the people he is working with. The appeals he makes in these lines are excellent examples of ethos, the rhetorical appeal to character. Bush continuously comments on the character of the people around him. He speaks of them as if he knows them very well, almost like old friends. Through this appeal the audience became able to relate to these people and learn a little bit about their character. Some of the people mentioned have large families and are of an honest and selfless nature. Because the speaker’s purpose is to gain support from the constituents for the candidates represented, the appeal to the character of the candidates is a crucial tool that becomes extremely vital to the swaying of the audience to the purposes of the speaker.

The events that took place in America on September 11, 2001 will have a lasting wound on this country forever. President George W. Bush’s speech, “A Great People Has Been Moved to Defend a Great Nation”, gave America something to have hope in. Bush was a republican president and was the 43rd of the United States and was a very passionate man. Although Bush had to make some tough decisions that very day, he was a president that made a lasting impact on America. Throughout Bush’s speech, he effectively covered pathos, ethos, and logos.

President George W. Bush uses pathos in his speech to help unify the people. His wording has people feeling shocked, surprised, and angry. He reasons the cause for the attack was because “we’re the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world” (Bush 7). Bush successfully vilifies the enemy, as it is still strong today, to unify the citizens under a common enemy. He continues pathos with a justice-seeking tone on how he will bring justice to those responsible. With compassion and hope, Bush asks people to pray on behalf of those affected by the

“None of us will ever forget this day, yet we go forward to defend freedom and all that is good and just in our world.” That was one of George W. Bush’s many emotional yet strong sayings in his speech of the tragic 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York city. His goal of unifying, making the country feel bonded together, was achieved through vivid and organized word choice. He chose these words to connect with the people of america's emotions and feelings, while also displaying authority and logical sense that terrorism is a threat to the world.

Picture this: a cold January day in Washington D.C, the first African American president is about to be inaugurated with a combined audience of over 38 million looking to be inspired.

The most interesting parts of Obama’s speech, to me, were the clarifications on his educational policies. His plans for higher education, such as halting student loan payments after 20 years or 10 years for public servants, seemed pretty cool to me. I’m not sure if taking government money to be used for student loans and giving it to parents while simultaneously stopping loan payments after 20 years is such a good idea. Pissing off the entire banking system might not be such a good idea in the long run. Grunts will be fired before CEOs cut their own bonuses, and I really don’t feel like that is particularly conducive to a good financial system.

On September the 11th, 2001 our nation was the victim of a tragic terrorist attack. A year later nothing had been done about it. Due to this fact, President Bush gave a speech to congress “President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat”, that was also nationally televised, trying to get the authority to use military force against Iraq. American Revolutionary Patrick Henry gave a similar speech “Speech to the Virginia Convention”, 227 years earlier, trying to convince Virginia State Delegates to go to separate from England, although the speeches were given hundreds of years apart Bush’s and Henry’s speeches are rhetorically alike in terms of antithesis, pathos, and loaded language.

Because of the purpose of his address, the discourse that Bush employs in his speech is epideictic. Epideictic discourse is concerned with praise and blame, and also attempts to form attitudes, which is what Bush does in his address to the nation. Bush is attempting to satiate the fears of the American people in his speech, and is also using his address to the nation’s citizens as an opportunity to attempt to instill an attitude of strength and determination within them.

Every civilized nation here today is resolved to keep the most basic commitment of civilization: We will defend ourselves and our future against terror and lawless violence (Bush, 11 November 2001).

The President begins his next point, starting his next paragraph with “but” , bringing out a change in tone and dropping the central argument into perspective. Using deductive reasoning skills, Obama explains more bluntly than before that America was never built to function under a single person, but work as a single unit as “American people can no more meet the demands of today’s world” and “ No single person can train all the… teachers we’ll need…” but “… now, more than ever, we must do these things together, as one nation and one people.” At this point the sense of feeling a of unity should be drilled into the depths of your brain.

Barack Obama’s Inaugural address contains many great American idealistic values and views. How well though do we Americans live up to these idealistic values and views talked about in Obama’s speech? To answer this question we need to look at where our values and views are now and how they should be in the future.

Obama’s speech demonstrated his relentless optimism, on the other hand President Trumps inaugural address was unusually dark and political. Trump enters office at a time when the nation is more politically divided than it has been in decades, but in other aspects is has improved. His speech was intense and darkly depicted his outlook on the country’s weaknesses. With imagery of “carnage” and “blood,” Trump exhibited no change from the language he famously used on his campaigns that landed him in the White House. Obama’s farewell speech was one of his last opportunities to make the case for policies such as the Affordable Care Act and Wall Street regulation, that Trump has vowed to repeal. He also appealed to citizens to embrace tolerance, which contrasts with the president who has called for building a wall between the United States and Mexico, as well as ending the admission of refugees from Muslim countries. Obama wanted the American people to embrace inclusiveness and keep his legacy alive as Trump takes over as President. Obama also warned that a “fear of change,” was more of a risk than bombs or missiles to democracy. He is confident that he has made America a better place than when he started, in contrast Trump believes Obama has left America in a

President Obama presented an address to the Nation. The address transpired on December the sixth. The address talked about the recent events that has occurred on Wednesday. Where fourteen Americans were taken from their friends and families. That’s one of numerous occasions of this type of situations happening. Obama claims he has a plan. He entitlements that he has “no greater responsibility that the security of the American people.” But yet he wants to continue to have our military hunt down terrorist’s plotters. A danger in the works. He also wants to train and equip thousands of Iraq and Syrian forces. That he claims is going to help us fight. There’s one idea that he has that caught my eye. It’s the only one that seems to be a good plan. That is implementing severer enforcement on transportation.