Primary Project Management Organizational Structures

The paper is divided into three sections, the first of which will establish a timeline of events. This project background will serve as a case study for the analysis in the following section that will be structured such that each of the previously mentioned facets will be independently analyzed and contrasted with project management principles. Finally the paper will conclude with a summary of the analysis and recommendations based on

In a matrix structure, each employee answers to two immediate supervisors: a department supervisor and a project manager. The department supervisor is charged with overseeing employees in a functional area such as marketing or engineering. Project supervisors manage a specific and often impermanent project. They absorb employees from various functional areas to complete their project teams. This kind of organizational structure has several advantages especially if the project managers identify their team strengths and weakness early. Directing the staff with effective leadership skills is a key role as a project manager. A clear direction of the project from start to completion is vital. Therefore, the project managers must carry top notch planning and organizational skills. To follow the WBS and have a clear understanding of the importance of remaining on budget throughout the entire project is mandatory. The experienced project manager must keep planning, staffing, budgeting and scheduling and other control techniques under wrap, by utilizing their administrative skill according to Project Management, (Kerzner, 2013). Although the administrative and other techniques are important, in this particular project, each project manager must work closely as a team member and example. Building the team and each departmental manager into a working cohesive team, could be the true

Project Management Institute. (2000). _A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (4th ed.)._

Project – this organization structure is temporary and is designed to achieve specific results while using teams of specialists from different areas within the company (Chand, n.d.) Once the project is over, the team members may be disbursed back to their original position or be assigned to another project. This style is good to use when there is a unique and unfamiliar to the company, work is not repetitive in nature, and critical in terms of possible gains or loses (Chand, n.d.). The project manager and the functional manager shares the authority over the project team members which could cause a conflict.

There are projects of different sizes that have different ways and requirements on how the people are organized. In small project, little organization structure is needed. There might be a primary sponsor, project manager and a project team. But, for large projects, there are more people involved, and it is important that people understand what they are expected to do, and what role

Within the project-based organizations is developed throughout the completion of projects. Between the non-project based organizations, the other areas of the project are completed

Assembling a project teams takes thought and consideration. Since the success of the project depends on the engagement of the members of the team, the assembly is

Projects have been part of human society. Since historical existence of the human society, people have always joined efforts to execute various initiatives. Projects draw a number of people who in turn oversee specific duties or aspects to achieve certain objectives. However, projects are complex, a factor that calls for proper leadership and collaboration. Failure to have effective leadership and management may occasion project failure (Turner, 2014).  In essence, most projects are defined by systems and departments that are overseen by specific individual or entities. The aim of structuring projects along various lines or specialties is to enhance success rates. In light of this, this paper reviews, evaluates and critically

The creation of a project like that was the clear prove a total different approach of managing a project. This team creation was a typical Heavy project management team in which a clear leader was identified and a dedicated project team was created. This was the right approach; in fact to foster a breakthrough innovation in a company the Heavy Project management approach is the most effective. I allow the project team to avoid the typical problems of a Functional and a Light weight project Management organization, granting a strong leadership a clear goal and minimizing the functional problems. This type of organization granted a real cross- functional integration that helped to reach the decided goals.

PRINCE2 advocates a clear definition of the project organisation structure, to provide the Project Manager with the staff and resources to efficiently and effectively complete the project.

Chapter 3 3-1: There is no ideal structure for all kinds of organizations or appropriate to single organization at different stages. It changes from situation to situation. Though Matrix organization structure is appropriate it has disadvantages like Conflict between line managers and project managers over resource allocation, project maintenance is difficult if teams have lot of independence and cost increases if because of lot of managers. 3-2: Organizational changing occurs at rapid rate because shorter life cycle of projects and rapidly changing environment. Traditional management is old process it does not work in many projects. Systematic planning with strong functional input will produce team work. During the transition from one

According to Gray and Larson (2008), a matrix type of organization is one in which a hybrid organization form of a project management structure is placed directly over the functional order of the normal business operations. Typically, this type of organizational structure has two chains of command and the project participants have to report to two separate chains of command. This type of structure is designed to use resources efficiently. It is also intended to provide an optimal solution while being able to accomplish multiple projects at the same time. According to Gray and Larson (2008), there are several advantages and disadvantages to this type of organizational structure. The advantages of this type of structure are that it allows multiple projects to go on at the same time by sharing resources. It also allows the project managers to focus on coordinating and integrating different units or resources that can be integrated into several functions within the organization. Also,

The implementations of organizational projects require careful attention to details. The key to a successful project implementation begins with the selection of the right players. In creating a project management team, careful attention must be made when selecting the Project Manager, the Project Leaders and certain strategic employees. Success depends on the caliber of the members of the team, the team’s ability to work together and to magnifying the talents of the team both individually and collectively, (Passage, 2006, p.44).

(There is no specific methodology or software to manage the projects by the company as was told by the contact person. But as described by the contact person, later on, after analysis, there system falls under Matrix structure.)

Organizations use governance to establish strategic direction and performance parameters. The strategic direction provides the purpose, expectations, goals, and actions necessary to guide business pursuit and is aligned with business objectives. Project management activities should be aligned with top-level business direction, and if there is a change, then project objectives need to be realigned. In a project environment, changes to project objectives affect project efficiency and success. When the business alignment for a project is constant, the chance for project success greatly increases because the project remains aligned with the strategic direction of the organization. Should something change,