Cloning is the process of replicating an identical copy of cells and or body parts and it can go as far as even a whole organism. Cloning has been a very debatable subject of matter for many years and it will for many more to come. Cloning was first established in 1885 with a demonstration with artificial embryo twinning. Cloning eventual became more complex and from there it stemmed off and cloning of animals was possible. Dolly the sheep was the first example of cloning of animals in July 5, 1996. Another area cloning stemmed off to stem cell research which was first discovered in Germany by a biologist Ernst Haeckel. There are many forms of cloning such as full on cloning of an animal. Another part of cloning is replicating organs …show more content…
People will always have differing and contrasting views on the very controversial topic of cloning. There are two sides of the topic the people who are for it and against it. The first topic of debate will be over the side of the people who agree with it. Second segment will give another reason why you should be for cloning. The third topic will be about the people who opposed cloning. The final topic will be about what side I agree with and why. In conclusion cloning will always be a topic of controversies for years to …show more content…
The cloning of embryonic stem cells has proven to be very innovative in the medical field. One of the point made were in the article "The Medical Benefits of Human Cloning." it says the following. We can produce embryonic stem cells of which that can be grown to replicate organs or tissues to repair or replace damaged or lost ones. This could mean that we would have the ability to save people from agony and suffering. For instance cloning of the embryonic stem cells we are able to grow new and improved skin for burn victims. We would also have to ability to grow back damaged brain cells, giving people a second chance. Another example of the uses cloning being a step forward in the medical field. Scientist have proven that they can do amazing things with cloning. In the same article "The Medical Benefits of Human Cloning." it states that we may one day be able to clone livers for people who are without. This could mean that some day in the near future we could give people another liver if it was lost. If we are able to replicate a liver for someone that could mean that not too far behind are kidneys and or bone marrow. If we could replicate bone marrow we could save millions from dying of cancer. In conclusion, maybe someday in the near future we may be able to save many savable people from death with newly innovative cloning
There have been recent studies on animals where the scientist cloned the animals. Cloning is something many people are split on. Some say it is bad some say it is good. I think cloning is a bad thing. Cloning can be a bad thing in many ways. I will be covering some of those ways in this paper.
Recently the world has turned its attention to a new development in science, cloning. Cloning is defined as “the process of producing a clone” (Dictionary.com). This has become a big deal because the endless ways we can bring back extinct creatures. Such as, the extinct wooly mammoth, the Tasmanian tiger, and Quagga. With the endless ability to bring back animal from the past with DNA there comes a problem. With human DNA made available so easily science has come to the idea and process of making designer babies. A designer baby is a baby whose genetic makeup has been selected in order to eradicate a particular defect, or to ensure that a particular gene is present. A family gene might be a bad disease which a baby might get when born. Before this, cloning a baby was science fiction idea to people. It was never imagined or even thought possible, but now it is not. Scientist have already started to create ways to clone babies. With this comes the problem of how far should scientist go? This could be both a blessing and a curse.
Why did scientists keep animal cloning a secret for so long? Did the scientists know that animal cloning would cause controversies? Do the bans on animal cloning actually prevent scientists from advancing cloning technology? Did scientists think that their discovery would help or even hurt the food industry? Animal cloning could help the food industry as long as its negatives do not outweigh the positives.
The topic of cloning has brought much debate in science and also in society. Many
The recovery period after large scale injuries could be shortened. The effects are analyzed in an article that states, “True healing could occur thanks to the cloning of their own cells to help the recovery process” (“Pros and Cons” 5). Basically, the process of cloning healthy cells could be used as an aid in replenishing damage of unhealthy cells. This process, if it were to be actualized, could help recovery progress in anything from pulled muscles to the paralysis of an entire limb. In theory, the same research can be applied in other areas. If this technology is paired with stem cell research, it could result in a method of repairing physical damage. An article that focused on advances in biotechnology stated that “Another use of cloned stem cells could be the growth of replacement tissues in the laboratory” (LaPensee 15). Necrosis, apoptosis, and lymphocyte diapedesis all cause tissue damage or death. These tissues could be replaced by cloned cells of healthy tissues. This shortens recovery periods and leads to healthier tissue growth.
There are many arguments against cloning. Leon R. Kass bases his argument on repugnance in his article The Wisdom of Repugnance. He is a well-known physician, educator and scientist. Kass perceives cloning as offensive, grotesque revolting, repulsive and wrong. To establish his argument he states, “Most people recoil from the prospect of mass production or human being, with large clones of look-alikes, compromised in their individuality.”1 His rationale is cloning is unnatural, because it is asexual and requires only one parent. Kass believes that cloning turns natural procreation into a manufactured process, which is not natural or moral. In his essay he also points out that cloning will also change the way we see ourselves through our
Cloning is a number of processes that are used to create genetically identical copies of an organism. Researchers have cloned a number of biological materials, such as genes, cells, tissues and whole organisms, including sheep 's and horses. Cloning can happen naturally in identical twins, but it can also be done in a lab. ("Cloning Fact Sheet").
According to Kathleen R. Brooks and Jayson L. Lusk (2011) Animal cloning is a process in which scientists can copy the genetic or inherited traits of an animal.
Cloning is a biological process of making genetically copy it would be copy of a single cell or whole animal. The first mammal cloned Dolly the sheep. There are three types of cloning: they are (1) the recombinant DNA technology or DNA cloning or gene cloning, (2) reproductive cloning, and (3) the therapeutic cloning.
There are two types of cloning, one of them is reproductive cloning which is when a whole organism is cloned and therapeutic cloning is the cloning of cells, organs or tissues. Cloning is when two cells decide or are forced to duplicate into two cells to replicate each other. Cloning can be done deliberately or naturally; and it results in two copies having identical cells, DNA, genes, organs and organisms. Cloning is a common, ongoing, debatable topic among society today. Many people argue about how future scientific advances in cloning will affect society. Most often people dislike the idea of cloning because it goes against their ethical beliefs, or because they are in fear of it ending up in the wrong hands. But sometimes when the
A population of identical units, cells, or individuals that derive from the same ancestral line is know as Clone. Therapeutic cloning involves creating a cloned embryo for the sole purpose of producing embryonic stem cells with the same DNA as the donor cell. These stem cells can be used in experiments aimed at understanding disease and developing new treatments for disease. As I was going over the reading I found out that the matter of cloning from the different prospect of human has been the subject of considerable public attention and sharp moral debate. It also raises new questions about the manipulation of some human beings for the benefit of others, the freedom and value of biomedical inquiry, our obligation to heal the sick,
Cloning is defined as the “creation of an exact copy of a living matter, such as a cell or organism” according to Encarta encyclopedia. The copies produced through cloning have identical genetic makeup and are known as clones. Scientists use cloning techniques in the laboratory to create copies of cells or organisms with valuable traits.
Cloning is the production of one or more individual organisms that are genetically identical. The copied organism, which has the same genetic code as the original, is called a clone. In the last two decades, cloning technology has been becoming more refined, and has been broadly applied in agriculture, human health, and many other fields. Breeding by cloning means being able to directly reproduce an animal with a desirable set of genetic traits. The world's most famous clone is Dolly the sheep, who was the first mammal to be cloned from an adult cell. This idea of being able to clone animals was encouraged by wanting to bring back extinct animals such as the wholly mammoth and dinosaurs, and maintain endangered species. Hence, it logically
When I looked up the definition for cloning on www.m-w .com it stated that cloning is to propagate a clone from or to make a copy of. A book on cloning that I read stated that cloning is genetically identical cells. Cloning’s history is as early as 1952 and the first cell transferring was in 1970. The cell process was not 100 percent accurate every time. Back in the 1970’s many scientists struggled with trying to clone something and it
The well known Oxford professor and biologist, Richard Dawkins, once said, “ Cloning may be good and it may be bad. Probably it's a bit of both. The question must not be greeted with reflex hysteria but decided quietly, soberly and on its own merits. We need less emotion and more thought ”. Cloning is the process of copying or creating a biological unit exactly. Some believe that cloning is a phenomenon made up by scientist, but even in biology, cloning is proven to be in some cases, a natural process. For example, a number of plants and single-celled organism reproduce genetically identical offspring and there are also identical twins that are reproduced by mammals. However, “man-made” cloning is called artificial cloning, which can be human cloning, gene cloning, reproductive cloning, and more. The first ever artificial cloning experiment was done on sea urchins. The reason the scientist chose the sea urchin is because it is a simple organism. The scientist, Hans Dreisch, got two sea urchin embryos and shook them. He discovered that when he did that, each sea urchin separated into another sea urchin cell and grew into a whole other sea urchin. That then, paved the way for further research on cloning. Multiple experiments and studies on cloning have been done on animals and cells. Nonetheless, cloning is still very mysterious, comes with risks, and messes with the mindset of average people, therefore, cloning is immoral.