It is my duty as a probation or parole officer to ensure that all offenders act according to the law. I am not sure if this is his first offense, even though h has been a model client. My first priority is to comply with the law. The offender is accountable for the results or outcome of is behavior. Some defendants think that probation or parole is a right they are entitled to, this kind of thinking may have gotten this client into trouble again. I would remind him of the terms and conditions outlined in the probation or parole contract. If you do not meet your obligation, you suffer the consequences, but on the other hand, we are to forgive seventy times seven. I would do everything that I could t help this client within the bounds of the
Regardless of the personal view of the client, the fact remains that as a probation officer certain responsibilities are expected for the offender. However, as a probation officer, if a drug test reveals the client is using marijuana, which is a violation, they would be given one warning only. As a condition of granting probation or parole, they will be informed of the conditions of probation or parole in writing and a drug test would be given every week. Furthermore, if there are reasonable grounds to believe that a person has violated the conditions of probation sentencing a second time, the courts will be informed and the offender remanded. In the event, the offender tries to avoid reporting for or consent to weekly drug testing, other
should define the topics of discussion and articulate the problem that will be discussed in
In addition, he enagaged in criminal activity dealing illegal drugs that poison communities and destroy families. It is the probation offices belief that the offender is unwilling to abide the social norms of society and that he poses a significant risk to public safety. Therefore the following recommendation of placing additional restraints while within the community on the offender appears warranted.
The history of probation and parole influences the decisions that are made in the Adult Court System toward the supervision of adult offenders by considering community corrections and involve supervision in the community. In the criminal justice system, there are many individuals locked up in local, state, and federal institutions. John Augustus probation bears much resemblance to probation as it is practiced today. He took great care in deciding which prisoners were promising candidates for probation. He also considers the offender’s character, age and factors that would have an impact on the offender after being released. His efforts actually were resisted by police, court clerks, and turnkeys who were paid only when offenders were incarcerated (Klein, 1997). The punishment for violating probation or parole is to continue supervision or to withdraw and incarcerate the offender.
Community correction is a term that refers to everything ranging from diversion before the trial to the punishments that follows after the trial. This refers to any way ranging to non imprisonment yet supervised ways used to deal with criminal offenders who are facing conviction or who has been convicted. (Beck et al., 2001). Probation as well as parole are the two most commonly way of dealing with the offenders though there are many ways such as being confined at home, electronic surveillance, day fines, community service shock probation and residential community supervision to mention but a few. The following are some of the intermediate sanction actions in the criminal corrections:
Despite the growing popularity of drug treatment courts in the United States, challenges and inconsistences surround the quintessential alternative to incarceration. As noted by Lindquist et al. (2006), there are vast inconsistencies in the clarification and implementation of graduated sanctions and rewards. The definitions and interpretation of graduated sanctions varies immensely on jurisdiction, which results in inconsistent application of sanctions. Rather than applying the graduated sanctions in a fair and standardized manner, some drug treatment courts are known to tailor the sanctions to the individual participant. This aberrant approach to the sanctions model results in ineffective treatment because participants may not know which sanction to expect to receive for committing a particular infraction (Lindquist, et al., 2006).
American Society is built upon a balance between the demand for personal freedoms and the need for public safety. It is in the attempt to achieve a balance between these two, that crimes begin to emerge. Criminal offenders who have been found guilty are eventually put into jails to serve time for the crime committed. Harsh sentences for low-level offenders have crowded penal facilities, taking big portions of state budgets. As a result of the overcrowded facilities and low budget, the government opted for probation. Probation is now the most common form of criminal sentencing in the United States. Probation is very common but, as long as the probationer doesn’t reoffend or get involve in illegal activities they can end their sentencing with probation. If the probationer does, in fact, get involved with illicit activities then the probationer is to be put back into the custody of the government.
The IDOC Parole Program addresses public safety and enhances parole supervision on the streets through increased monitoring and provides assists to services, which reduce recidivism. All parolees receive direct supervision in the community. The Parole Division has increased its parole agent numbers and contact with parolees as they return to the community, as well as has case management programs and specialized parole surveillance units (Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) Website). Yet, this more like policing and not services-oriented.
Federal probation was put in place to suspend a current sentence of an inmate and place them under the supervision on a qualified agency for a period of time to either free up the jail from nonviolent offenders or to try rehabilitate the offender from any future criminal acts. The development of the federal probation system began in 1925 when a bill was passed and signed by President Coolidge (Alarid, 2015). Before then, federal probation was rejected as an idea many times because it was introduced during the Prohibition Era. The National Probation Act that supported federal probation was put into effect, but it wasn’t until the mid-1900 that the federal probation law was fully working and overwhelmed as well. Since the work load got to intense
Today there are several options a judge can grant an offender in regards to the punishment they shall fulfill before or after trial. This refers to any way ranging to non imprisonment yet supervised ways used to deal with criminal offenders who are facing conviction or who has been convicted.. There are punishment an offender may receive such as fines, community service, electronic surveillance also know as house arrest, shock probation, intensive supervision, residential community supervision etc. The most common punishment used by the justice system is probation as well as parole. Probation is the release of an offender from detention , subject to a period of good behavior under supervision. An individual may be granted probation as an
thrown in as an option (Kramer et al., 2009). After implementing the restrictive sentences thousands of individuals were still rearrested; this method did not work unless the threat of going to prison was added (Horne et al., 2015). Treatment facilities that help drug offenders showed a link between drugs and crime that gave policy makers an opportunity to make mandatory minimum sentences, treatment sentencing, and various intervention programs a coping mechanism in the criminal justice system (Kramer et al., 2009). These alternatives did not solve the problem of drug abuse (Kramer et al., 2009). Rehabilitation centers may work to steady the drug addiction, but it may not always work for those who are dependent on drugs (Kramer et al., 2009)
Problem Statement #1: The client is a known drug dealer for a gang and has admitted to using both of the drugs he sells (ecstasy and meth).
Probation and parole are an important part of the criminal justice process, and both are
Be sure to address the four types of sentencing models and the issues surrounding them (equity, truth-in-sentencing and proportionality).
The probationary period can be as short as a month or as long as a year, depending on the situation.The purpose of a probationary period is to suspend or alter the standard work rules for a worker who is taking in an occupation or attempting to perform.For instance supose a worker a worker is attempting to finish month to month reports, now and again giving them in late or neglecting to incorporate the fundamental