Process Evaluation And Outcome Evaluation

Evaluation is a process that is used to look at the project, policy or program critically. It includes the collection and analyzing information that is related to the program or policy and that of its outcome. The Main purpose is to improve the policy or the program effectiveness. This will also help to identify any of the weak areas and changes that need to be made in the policy.

Evaluation is an assessment of something or making an observation of the outcome whether good or bad. An example of evaluating is after the Year 8 disco, was the year 8 pupil’s filing out an evaluation form on how they thought the event went. There are many different ways to evaluate such as minutes of meeting, questionnaires, post-event papers and circulation list.

Process evaluation is used to determine if the program activities have been implemented as intended. Outcome evaluation is used to measure effects of a program in the target population by estimating the progress in the outcome objectives that the program is to achieve (CDC, n.d.).

“Outcomes evaluation is often described first by looking at its basic components. Outcomes evaluation looks at programs as systems that have inputs, activities/processes, outputs and outcomes -- this system's view is useful in examining any program!

A process evaluation is a tool utilized to identify the key components of intervention that are effective and under what conditions. Additionally it also evaluates the extent to which a program is being implemented as planned. A process evaluation can be broken down into six steps which are depicted in the diagram below. In order to engage stake holders the process must begin at the evaluation cycle. Stakeholders in regards to our program include those who are directly involved with program operations. This includes the staff utilized to procure supplies and equipment, those involved in the delivery of supplies equipment, those who distribute educational materials, those that perform diabetic testing and those that interact with the target

Outcome evaluations can show if clients are not benefiting as a result of a program to the extent desired.

Program evaluation is an important tool to show that the health interventions have been effective and they also intend to improve the health of the target population. Evaluation helps define the worth of a program. It is imperative to conduct program evaluation in order to provide feedback to improve the effectiveness of the program. Evaluation plans should be developed at the beginning of the health program interventions. The CDC framework for program evaluation is comprised of the following steps:1) Engage stakeholders; 2) Describe the program; 3) Focus on evaluation design; 4) Gather credible evidence; 5) Justify conclusions; 6) Ensure use and share lessons learned. Also listed are the four standards for assessing the quality of evaluation activities: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy (CDC, 2013). According to an article

The second evaluation approach would be outcome/impact evaluation examine the outcome and impact the program has on the targeted population. Furthermore, the evaluation can be useful

The Business Dictionary defines the word impact as a "measure of the tangible and intangible effects (consequences) of one thing's or entity's action or influence upon another". In essence impact is just defining the result something has had upon another thing. I think this is a good definition when speaking of sports because every new innovation is going to have some sort of impact either good, bad or a neutral.

When I hear the word impact I automatically think of having some kind of strong effect and making a difference. I think that the word impact has meaning that changes based on how it is used. For example impact can be something leaving a lasting memory or effect on someone/something or it could physical like two objects hitting each other.

Level four (effectiveness) is known to for being one of the most used forms of evaluation in a program. According to Dignan (2015), this level questions to what extend the desired results are being produced in the target population by the program activities that are created. The measurement that is done with effectiveness can consist of a collection of information from individuals, review of program records, or monitoring official statistics describing the target population.

Program evaluation is the process of collecting information about a program in order to make decisions about it. Including an evaluation plan shows that you take your objectives seriously and want to know how well you have achieved them. More and more foundations and donors expect to see an evaluation component in the programs they fund.

Two reasons for evaluation are to assess and improve the quality of a program and to determine the effectiveness of a program. To evaluate the program, summative and impact evaluations deem the best. An impact evaluation is described as the immediate observable effects of a program, it measures the knowledge, skills, awareness, attitudes, and behaviors. (McKenzie et al., 2013, p.376). Because the program intends to spark a behavior modification, this evaluation style works best. The impact evaluation can help to show the strengths of the program and what needs to be improved if the desired behavior is not achieved.

Impact describes the after-effect of a change that occurred in the subject in question. In regards to sports, an impact can describe when a change has been made in the way a sport is played and how that change has affected the game overall. Every sport has a unique set of equipment designed specifically for that sport. It may not seem so but the equipment involved is highly significant in regards to how the game is played. One sport that experienced a significant impact in the way the sport was played is pole vaulting. The most significant change in the equipment was the shift from the straight pole method to the bendable pole method. Initially, the pole vaults were made of hardwood or bamboo, but now they’re made of carbon fiber and fiberglass.

The process of impact assessment indicates its ability to be inclusive, by assessing impacts on different groups of the community, including people who may be disadvantaged, marginalized or excluded from society and, therefore, particularly vulnerable to impacts, such as children, women, indigenous peoples, people belonging to ethnic or other minorities, or persons with