Unit 2 Implementation Evaluation

Evaluation is a process that is used to look at the project, policy or program critically. It includes the collection and analyzing information that is related to the program or policy and that of its outcome. The Main purpose is to improve the policy or the program effectiveness. This will also help to identify any of the weak areas and changes that need to be made in the policy.

"Formative evaluation is research conducted for the purpose of informing program improvement efforts" (Krysik & Finn, 2013, p. 112). To make sure the program will be effective, I would gather polls from the youth of Riverton about the usefulness of the program, and if it is helping children stop the over usage of alcohol. Another process to determine if the program is doing well, I will compare the results taken from Riverton community to a community

Program planning is a process to achieve a particular goal and/or mission. Program planning is an organized process through which a set of coordinated activities or interventions is developed to address and facilitate change in some or all of the identified problems. Program evaluation provides useful information for improving the programs and the service delivery systems. Program evaluation is to improve the program planning, effectiveness, design, and efficiency. The two are different processes, but ideally they hold the same goals and/or mission. The evaluation process takes place after the planning of a

Policy evaluation applies accepted social science research methods to public programs. The same research designs used in laboratory experiments are not always practicable in the field, but the same principles can guide the planning and execution of policy evaluation.

Program planning sets the stage for realistic program goals and organizes a plan of action.   Program evaluation provides the program staff with the opportunity to make adjustments and improvements to the program.   Program evaluation provides the important input necessary for ongoing progress and planning.

First, would look at my measurement method to make sure that it is reliable and valid. Making sure that the measurements are representing the people and the program accurately, enough sample size is use to represent the program, and make sure there is no participants contamination. Second, the time from when the program started and when the evaluation process starts can also show that the program have no impact. It takes a long time for programs to work out the kink and bumps along the way and sometimes having an evaluation conducted within a year will not show the program at its full potential. There is also the sleeper effect where the program will not show impact until a much later time. Having an open and clear communication with the stakeholders will let me know what they are looking in the program evaluation so that I can focus on those aspects to make sure I use accurate

Clegg and Smart (2010) noted that the term outcome measurement process is often interchangeable with achievement, goal, objective and indicator. Furthermore, Clegg and Smart (2010) went on to identify these terms, goals, outcomes present as essential elements to assist in identification of relevant data for program evaluation. Definitions of terms recognizes that goals are a broad statement of the ultimate aims of the program, outcomes are the changes in the lives of recipients, organization communities and those impacted by the program, and indicators indentifies specific, measurable information that can be collected or tracked to show that outcomes have occurred (Clegg & Smart, 2010).

Engage current and past participants in surveys and process evaluations to assess program’s efficacy and

The program evaluation model will be implemented in various stages. The stages include evaluation planning, data collection, analysis/interpretation, and reporting/dissemination. The setting is a college campus’s counseling unit of their wellness center. The assessment will also focus on students that only utilize one-on-one, face-to-face counseling services.

The main objective of implementing the evaluation tool is to ensure progress and performance of the evidenced based change projects. Various types of the evaluation tools are

A process evaluation is a tool utilized to identify the key components of intervention that are effective and under what conditions. Additionally it also evaluates the extent to which a program is being implemented as planned. A process evaluation can be broken down into six steps which are depicted in the diagram below. In order to engage stake holders the process must begin at the evaluation cycle. Stakeholders in regards to our program include those who are directly involved with program operations. This includes the staff utilized to procure supplies and equipment, those involved in the delivery of supplies equipment, those who distribute educational materials, those that perform diabetic testing and those that interact with the target

As a general rule, these guidelines are an acceptable method to further the process. These subsets allow for the further identification and streamlining of the process. This series of processes allows for the identification of variables that could develop into

At the beginning of the program an internal evaluator will be conducting the evaluation. He or she will be more familiar with the program, and responsible for the decision-making within the program, will be up to date with current and future results, and will be able to communicate with the directors of the intervention frequently and clearly. He or she will focus on a formative evaluation because is a method to obtain and to judge before or during the implementation

Two reasons for evaluation are to assess and improve the quality of a program and to determine the effectiveness of a program. To evaluate the program, summative and impact evaluations deem the best. An impact evaluation is described as the immediate observable effects of a program, it measures the knowledge, skills, awareness, attitudes, and behaviors. (McKenzie et al., 2013, p.376). Because the program intends to spark a behavior modification, this evaluation style works best. The impact evaluation can help to show the strengths of the program and what needs to be improved if the desired behavior is not achieved.

According to Rossi et al (1993), “evaluation is the systematic application of scientific mediums to assess the design, implementation, improvement or outcomes of a programme.” When evaluating a programme, it is useful to be armed with a selection of tools, so that an evaluator’s professional arsenal allows them to be flexible and to employ different techniques based on the individual problems and situational needs of the programme. Regardless of the numerous variations to evaluation both the goal-oriented model and naturalistic evaluation model are equally popular and widespread. Nevertheless, these models differ in certain spectrums and their effectiveness comes from cardinally opposite sides of evaluation methods.