Public Library Vs. Public Libraries

Subpoint 2: schools and public library area were people are power do not have enough computer or computer of good quality.

In defense of laptops in the classroom” Summary/Analysis/Response (SAR) Paper Summary “In defense of laptops in the classroom” written by Rebecca Schuman, talks about the issue of why computers should be allowed in a college classroom. Schuman explains how people of the new generation use computers in classrooms doing almost everything in college now, rather it be taking notes or accessing course material, and it's more affordable for poorer students. Analysis Schuman attempts to use logos, structuring of her article, and has a good purpose to persuade readers of her agreement. Schuman wrote this article “In defense of laptops in the classroom” in order to persuade professors why computers should be allowed in the classroom and how you can combat them if the student isn’t paying attention, plus they are more affordable for poorer students because they’re covered by financial aid. Schuman focuses on this group of audience primarily because some professors do not like computers in their classroom rather it be because the student isn’t paying attention or is using the computer for non-class related things. Schuman attempts to reason the discussion of why computers should be allowed in the class is that it’s completely up to the student whether they use it for good or not. Schuman makes the point early on that she feels that the computer is not faulty, but rather the student who makes the decision on what use to use the computer for. Schuman exemplifies this problem when she

It is a new world today because of the rate it is growing at. From homes all over America to international companies, technology has now managed to creep its way into the classrooms. In the article “Virtual Students, Digital Classroom” Neil Postman states, “…We will become the kind of people the technology requires us to be, and whether we like it or not,we will remake our institutions to accommodate technology” (378). This statement affirms that the need for technology will just continue to grow and that it will govern children. Walking to the library and spending what seems like endless hours to do research for homework is unheard of anymore. Students nowadays have everything they need right at their fingertips, never having to leave the comforts of their home to do school work. With that being said, though, Postman also says, “...The computer and its associated technologies are awesome additions to a culture, and are quite capable of altering the psychic, not to mention the sleeping, [sic] habits of our young” (378). Is it actually helping students or is it honestly hurting them? With the addition of new machines, students are pushed to adhere more information but are given easier ways to gather

In the article "Can Students Have Too Much Tech?" Susan Pinker explains the pros and cons of technology in the classroom. Her argument is supplemented by Studies from Duke University and Stanford University. She also utilized the history of the One Laptop per child nonprofit, along with her own research and opinions.

Ever since the early 80’s, there has been a rise in technology. From the first Macintosh, to the latest iPhone, technology has evolved to fit nearly any environment. However, not everyone agrees with this rise in the techno age. Psychologist Susan Pinker claims that technology is stripping down student education. She addresses her reasoning in The New York Times editorial entitled: “Can Students Have Too Much Tech?” She argues that, “...mounting evidence shows that showering students, especially those from struggling families,will not shrink the class divide in education. If anything, it will widen it.” Pinker informs parents and educators that having too much technology in and out of the classroom will ruin a child’s education, especially

We live in a world where technology runs everything. Without it we wouldn't be able to stay cool in the summer or be able to keep up on the news. Now let's narrow in on technology that we are very familiar with, computers and the Internet. The Internet has expanded the way we get information. More importantly how we get our work done. For example my 8th grade year in middle school, I was placed in a mandatory computer class. I learned to efficiently type, use word documents, and create a professional PowerPoint. Without this class I would've been at a disadvantage in high school and college. The use of computers has made its way into schools, but there's a question to ask. How does this effect the schools

My computer; it’s where I complete everyday tasks, it’s where I go to in the need of help, it’s where I can extend my knowledge. My Mac Book Pro contains so much data for all of my school projects, pictures and documents. I can look up a how-to video or research data for an essay with a touch of my fingertips all within seconds. With its stylish silver coating and slim design, I can take it anywhere at anytime. I, as a student and like many others are completely dependent on technology like computers for work, school, recreational use, etc. Everywhere you go you see people texting away or surfing the web. Teachers, as for yourself, use computers to take role, enter grades, construct worksheets and do a whole lot more. Technology is where most

and more than one child. So what are the families expected to do buy more computers I think not. Or is the school providing computers for the kids that is a whole nother problem with smaller kids those laptops would be destroyed they would be drawn on drinks spilled just to name a few things and could happen to the computers.Undoubtedly this is one of the m​ ost important reason we don’t need edays. So clearly​ this is the reason that some families can do edays because they don’t have a computer.

In the New York Times article “Leave Your Laptops at the Door to my Classroom,” Professor Darren Rosenblum described the controversial decision

Laptops today has Microsoft. Or google docs. Most schools would like to use them instead of going to the library to use the computers. But the laptops has some negative effects with it, because it could be a distraction, the money for the laptops would be expensive, and most likely you wouldn’t learn anything.

Have you ever taken a tour to an middle or high school and saw where the black boards use to be there are now giant computer screens? Our world is changing to a new era where technology has taken over not only the homes but the schools as well. Computers can now be found in almost every classroom and home, but, is this a good a thing or a bad thing? In the New York Times article “Can Students Have too Much Tech” written by Susan Pinker she examines what it means to have technology not only in the classroom but, in the homes of many children. While I agree that teachers must also be equipped with skills to manage, educate, and control technology in their lesson plan, I find her reference to be flawed. Her references does not examine the educational

As shown in the film middle school of New York had the student who lacked interest in studying until new principal allowed them to use computer as tool for education. Therefore, the students were fascinated to learn which boost their percentage performance much higher than previous one. Also the student’s changes of behavior like, less fights, attendance and arguments. Also in my high school in classes related to Literacy, Economics, Science for projects students were provide laptops to research. Indeed, for my English Literature

Teachers are supposedly teaching their students to be the best they can be. Technological advancement of laptops in the secondary education school system hinders students learning by decreased test scores, the increased education gap between classes, the increased frustration of students, and the enabled abuse of educational resources. The teachers are the decision makers in deciding if laptops are crucial for success or if laptops lead to failure.

In recent years, federal and local governments have been pouring overwhelming amounts of taxpayer money into buying computers and other digital tools for K-12 education. The rationale is computers are more important than ever, and they are gaining in popularity daily, so it is necessary to prepare our students to use them in their daily lives. But the tools that are being invested in are not being used effectively, and they are showing very minor benefits relative to the massive economical investment that the public has placed in it.

Low income students don’t have a choice of having wifi or a computer. It is very hard for them to do any studying at home, so having wifi and computers at school would be very helpful for their education.