Q2. If you had $2.5 million would you save a life of a Jew or buy a Lamborghini?
Q3. Can Money Buy you Happiness?
Q4. Can Money buy you Justice?
Q5. Can money buy you care? Q6. If you found a wallet would you return it?
Q7. If you need money anxiously than you would do the same thing?(Returning the wallet) Q8. Would you justify this if one person is needy so that he can do unethical practice?
Q9. Does society insist the people to go unethical?
Q10. Does government playing enough roles in ethical and moral reasoning in the society? Data Analysis
With the help of the sample of questionnaires we concluded different results. The question no.1 is money everything? Was answered that 38% of the people selected to
…show more content…
65 % said yes and 35 % said no.
And finally in the end we asked in question no.10 that Does government playing enough roles in ethical and moral reasoning in the society? 60% said yes and 40% said no.So it is a question mark on the system?
Results and Findings
Recommendations
After the research we would like to add about theories that;
Justice cannot be prevailed if u start caring so much for the individuals.
Feminist approach has emotional decision making capability not rational.
Women cannot be part of some crucial decisions.
Soft-corner of feminist ethics will lead to instability over some criminal activities. For example insurgency, terrorism.
Punishments cannot be enforced by following Ethics of care. For example hang till death etc.
Female opinion may be biased over similar approaches regarding preferences of feminist thinking and involvement of females.
Emotional torture will lead to leaking of secrets.
Females are not authoritarian.
Dominance of males in societies all across the globe.
Justice keeps the stability and balance in the societies.
In search of association and alternatives may be crucial sometimes.(Above Case Study Evaluation of Amy and Jack)
Moreover care system is very complex and difficult to quantify.
Justice involves Rational and Logical decision making which makes this system hit.
Care is only limited to individual and family system. E.g Mother – Son
From history of world especially of countries like USA, India it can be find out that punishments
Within Feminism itself there are many different approaches to crime and deviance including Liberalism, Radicalism and Post-modernism. Each of them believes that crime, or the lack of crime, is a result of the patriarchal dominance in society. Feminists believe that the patriarchy generates crime against women whilst discouraging deviancy amongst women.
Many feminists in the United States believe that gender-based discrimination and inequality exist in schools, homes, and workplaces. Studies in the late twentieth century showed that teachers from kindergarten to college level often treated boys and girls differently, steering boys toward mathematics and science and girls toward the humanities and social sciences. However, another study conducted in Denmark suggests that female students are less inclined to pursue the sciences,
Currently, this generation lies in a time of unprecedented growth and change. The last few decades have endured years of transformation thereby allowing for the evolution of the human mind. The evolution of the human mind and its thought process all lies within cultural beliefs; beliefs affect attitudes and attitudes invertedly affect behavior. These behaviors may implement a form of prejudice and discrimination upon a certain group of individuals. Perhaps the most concurred concept revolving around attitudes and behaviors rests upon gender roles. This flawed concept created by man himself has indoctrinated society to acquire a negative perception of women. Women carry a stigma that they are both unintelligent and are subordinate to their
punishment is already in existence, the problem is that it is not enforced. This lack of
An individual's social location - meaning their ascribed identities, roles and relationships - are of central significance to feminists as it influences the power one possesses, which in traditional IR theory is gendered and patriarchical. According to Christine Sylvester, these scholars suggest that conventional IR has avoided thinking of men and women in the capacity of embodied and socially constituted subject categories by classifying them into 'neutral' categories . Most theorists too readily accept that women are located inside the typically separate sphere of domestic life and "...retreating to abstractions, i.e. the state, that mask a masculine identity." Feminist analysts are suspicious of ungendered IR texts and champion for their subversion while many seek to implement replacement theories. These theorists contend that identity, gender, and indeed women, are social constructs. Key feminist conceptions include liberal ideas of women's equality, socialist conceptions of a sexual division of labour and the Freudian suggestion that identities are produced, often within the evolution of patriarchy . Many academics share the assumption that the world would be less competitive and less violent if women gained dominance in positions of power .
On the other hand, many sociologists have argued the importance of external factors in influencing gender differences in achievement. Feminism strives for equality in society for men and women and has questioned the typical role of males and females in society and challenges the role of women being the housewife. Feminists have had a great influence on improving girls self-esteem and aspirations. Sue Sharpe's
The extent and degree of information and detail written in this article about each represented author and their contributing works can ultimately be seen as one of the articles main strengths. However, although this article gives a vast amount of information on the women’s opinions and beliefs the article at times seems disassembled and erratic. The flow of the article is somewhat hard to follow, and without an increased measure of concentration, the ability of the reader to comprehend and decipher whom the author is speaking of can be lost. Also, with the extensive amounts of information and detail that each female author contributes to the argument, readers are bombarded with data to interpret and distinguish upon. With the author of the article not decisively choosing the strongest points of argument from each author, the information becomes overwhelming and possibly confusing at times.
• Do the ideological structures appear to be natural when it comes to accepting the female's secondary position in society ?
Gender bias is not all about stereotype, but it also classifies the gender to “be” certain things and
Feminist do not argue for sympathy or recognition, but rather a softer approach to international conflict to what it already put into place by the dominant masculine hierarchy.
I believe that this train of thought addresses the cause of criminal behavior in women because many viewpoints that fall under the umbrella of feminism are given as different causes of criminal conduct in women .Feminist criminology lacks evidence of a woman’s crime. Women's activist theories not only strive to elucidate criminal wrong doing, exploitation and additionally join together theory with practice to create more impartial answers for the crime at hand.
II. RELEVANCE: Everyone, worldwide, has been affected by gender stereotypes in some shape or form, even with lasting effects, yet feminism is still seen as an evil and man-hating movement.
The basis of the study originated on multiple previous studies with added variables and altered surveys. The research began with a sound base and high reliability and validity. By taking previous information, the researchers were able to revalidate older studies and add new information. This was the first study done with sole female participants; the previous studies had looked at sexist discrimination before, but with males as well. Participants’ race was varied, adding to the external validity of the results. The analysis looked at the variables individually and collectively to produce more information from the data they collected. In addition, they studied private and public feminist identity in order to eliminate issues of construct validity in the definition.
Gender ideologies determine the roles that men and women should adhere to in society and are influenced by an individual’s social beliefs and experiences. From traditional to egalitarian values, prejudicial and discriminator behavior towards women can be explained as either interest based or exposure based (Bolzendahl & Myers 2004). The interest based theory is dependent on whether or not an individual’s personal goals are negatively impacted by gender inequality. If so, they are then more likely to embrace an egalitarianism way of thinking.