preview

Qualitative Research Critique

Decent Essays

The article written by Hunsaker, Chen, Maughan, and Heaston (2015) clearly identified the academic and clinical qualifications of the researchers, however, they were not thoroughly explained. The employment location of each researcher as well as their degree level was skillfully listed. Based on this information, the readers believed their qualifications were appropriate to conduct this study.
Problem and Purpose There was not a clearly titled section called Problem. The background and the significance of the problem were thoroughly discussed throughout the introduction of the article. The problem statement was clearly identifiable as: the need to identify the level of compassion fatigue in emergency department nurses (Hunsaker et al., 2015). The purpose of the research was clearly stated, was delineated, but was not adequately supported by evidence.
Literature Review
A total of 35 sources were used throughout the article. Of the 35 sources, 27 of them were written in the last 10 years, which …show more content…

The sample was adequately described as purposive sampling used to recruit a total of 1,000 registered nurses who worked in EDs throughout the United States. Regrettably, the setting was poorly delineated. Data collection for this study was explained in precise detail in regards to review board approval, letters of explanation and informed consent, mailed questionnaires and Pro-QOL scales, as well as the return of surveys and reminders.
Hunsaker et al. (2015) clearly discussed the statistical tests that were used in the study. The data was analyzed by the Statistical Package for Social Science, a series of Pearson r correlation, t test and a one-way analysis of variance. The results of the study were sufficiently presented in Table 1, which used the Stepwise solution for analysis.

Get Access