Questions Regarding Possible Claims And Outcomes Against The Producers

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein set forth and subject to the terms and conditions hereof, the parties agree as follows:

Rule : : Contract formation requires mutual assent (offer and acceptance), consideration, and no viable defenses to contract formation.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties agree as follows:

I have reviewed the agreement, however, under Submittals, Section Four (4), page 2, with questions.

Acceptance-This basically means that the terms of the offer have been clearly understood and agreed to through consent and assent and at no time will the terms be changed.

Acceptance. This basically means that the terms of the offer have been clearly understood and agreed to through consent

This is a clear expression of a party accepting agreement to the terms of the offer.

The offer and acceptance model is flawed- only an agreement is necessary. In order to fully comprehend this statement, we must first establish what constitutes and offer and what constitutes acceptance. “An offer is a statement by one party of willingness to enter into a contract on stated terms, provided that these terms are, in turn, accepted by the party to whom the offer is addressed”. Acceptance is “…an unqualified expression of ascent to the terms proposed by the offeror”. The “Offer and acceptance model” is based on the court’s adopt the “mirror image” rule of contractual formation. Applying the definitions stated above, we can take this to mean that there must be a clear and unequivocal offer which must be matched by an equally

Offer is the promise made by the offeror. Generally, advertisement is the invitation to treat. Invitation to treat is different to the offer, so the advertisement is not an offer. (Partridge v Crittenden［1968］ 1 WLR 1204)

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein, intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties agree as follows:

There is a concluded contract between International Imports Pty and South pacific Imports made on 3 December. The contents of this concluded contract are contained in the facsimile sent on 3 December by the buyer who is also the offeror (International Imports Pty Ltd) to the seller who is also the offeree (South Pacific Imports) indicating that the buyer agrees to the terms of the seller and further asking the seller to deliver the goods as agreed.

The statement in this question is “Consideration is the concept of legal value in connection with contracts. It is anything of value promised to another when making a contract. However, “past consideration is not considered a good consideration”. Please illustrate your answer with reference to 3 articles and case laws.”

7.What is the denotation of the advertisement? 8.What is the connotation can we infer from the advertisement? 9.what discourses are present? (need to include bias) 10.What presentation have been communicated?

According to general law principle, an offer must be clear on certain terms and must be communicated to the other party, a vague information the offeror given would be regarded as an invitation to treat and mere buff or boast. Obviously and generally, a normal advertisement locally would be an invitation to treat, which is not enforceable to be an offer such as case of Partridge v Crittenden(1968), but if there are some specific set of terms in order to create legal relations, an offer can be found. See example of Blackpool & Fylde Aero Flying Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council(1990).

iv. During negotiation “business issues” took the centre stage and legal issues were to be addressed later. It shows mutual trust and focus on goals.