While reading the class study, the skills that I believe were relevant to be addressed were Kevin’s little progress in decoding and phonics and basic reading. Kevin has the ability to comprehend at grade level, but he needs work with his basic reading knowledge. Once the teachers know what they need to work on, it is important to find a program that works for the student. While I was looking through the sources, I found one that met the four dimensions of an EBP, there was an excellent research design, quality, magnitude of effect, and supporting research. Since he is moving into the general education classroom for more time, I believe that an appropriate EBP would be Reading Recovery found on Promising Practices website. The Reading Recovery is a program that works, it is an instructions support that addresses cognitive development. While reviewing the Reading Recovery, I thought that this would benefit Kevin the most. Even though this EBP is for students that are younger then him, this could help with his basic reading skills. The Reading Recover would work with students who have low literacy skills for 30 minutes daily until the student reached …show more content…
Students were pretested before the two groups were put in this experiment, the pretest tested for running record of text reading, letter identification, concepts about print, word reading, writing vocabulary, and hearing and recording sounds in words. Once the pretest was done, teachers started the EBP and throughout were testing students on phoneme segmentation, deletion task, slosson oral reading, and degrees of reading power. Once the Reading Recovery was completed, students with vocabulary improved 13.75 times than a student that was not included in this practice, also improvement of 4.60 times with hearing and recording sounds with words. Other ending results were the improvement of letter identification by
After discussing the plan with the teacher, she agreed on working with me for the plan to be successful. The child strength is that he easily understands context and follow directions very well. Derrick can read books and understand what he have read however, he have a difficult time reading aloud during reading time. One strategy I implement to the teacher is let him pick a book he likes and ask to share it with the class. Ask him question after question about the story; also ask him to show pictures from the book. Encourage him to keep reading by following along and showing interest, limited how many times the teacher correct him. Strategies for increasing his vocabulary let the student use the computer to play words game and different
Phonemic awareness is a vital role in literacy instruction. Many schools and districts adopt a commercially published basal reading program and it becomes the cornerstone of their instruction ( (David Chard, n.d.). We also know that through investigation and research it has shown us that word-recognition instruction and instruction in oral language skills related to word recognition were inadequately represented. (David Chard, n.d.) The same researchers have found that the reading passages that students are reading didn’t relate to the words they were learning. In order for students to read at grade level or above a supplemental program should be implemented. I have found that at my school we are lacking a phonics program that will reach different students abilities and make them successful in reading. My goal for this paper is to show my district that using a supplemental phonics program aside from our basal phonics program will prove beneficial to strategic readers who fall below grade level.
History: This student has been on our campus since Kindergarten. At an early age, he was brought to the Response to Intervention Committee for behavior concerns in the classroom and bus. Over the years his behavior has had its positive and negative effects on his academic areas with a large concern in English Language Arts. He has been a Tier 2 or Tier 3 student in reading since first grade. He is currently receiving a reading intervention, however at the fourth grade level there is an urgency to provide an intervention in writing.
In ELED 4444 (Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties), I was assigned by Dr. Morrison to work with a peer to create a diagnostic report based on a semester long tutoring project at Washington Irving Elementary School. To create the report, my partner and I ran pretests (Informal Reading Inventory-Graded Word List, Oral, Silent, and Listening Comprehension Passages, Basic Sight Words and Phrases, Phonics, and the DIBELS mid-year assessment) to see what we needed to work on with the student and then we created lesson plans that addressed the child’s needs. After tutoring the student for eight weeks, we post tested him to gather data on how much he progressed. We used the post-tests: IRI Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension, Basic Sight words and Phrases, Phonics, and the DIBELS assessment
The analysis determined that difficulties in reading are strongly related to the lack of phonemic awareness. Instruction, when given explicitly and direct one on one focus in one skill area of phonemic awareness were greater than instructions that focused on three or more skill areas. In addition, the NRP continued to state that children taught in small group settings showed larger improvement gains than students taught in large groups or individually. The panel concluded that it could be taught under a variation of conditions, for a diverse range of learners. Furthermore, it stated that instruction of phonemic awareness was more effective through the use of letters, explicitly focused on only one or two areas of awareness, lesson and activities were tailored toward small group development levels, and program ranged from 5 to 18 hours – remaining under 20 hours of instruction based on 25 minute instruction
Reading Recovery is a highly effective short-term intervention of one-to one tutoring for low-achieving first graders. The intervention is most effective when it is available to all students who need it and used as a supplement to good classroom teaching” (Cox, 254).
Creating and implementing effective lessons for a literacy learner who is struggling with reading and writing takes much effort and appropriate resources. Throughout the Literacy Development course, I have gained much insight and resources that have become valuable tools in addressing students’ literacy needs. Each week, I conducted lessons and activities that targeted the needs of many students, but my initial focus on was on one particular student. His individual reading level, spelling development, and writing abilities were analyzed and the recorded data was used
The REWARDS reading program can be used for middle and high school students in grades 6 through 12 who lack advanced word identification skills and are slower oral readers than their peers. These students tend to read one and two syllable words accurately but have difficulty with words of three or more syllables. It can also be used for struggling readers who
When reading silently, he was able to comprehend at a fourth-grade reading level, but he would pout or walk out of the room if asked to read aloud. A few weeks into the fall semester, I noticed that Steven would sneak into the back room during silent reading. It seemed as if he was trying to focus, but I soon discovered that he was actually using technology tools to improve his comprehension. He found audio clips of the novel we were reading on YouTube and he was listening to them as he followed along in his text. With the help of our campus literacy coach, his houseparents, and upperclassmen tutors, I began to push Stephen to practice reading aloud. By the conclusion of his sophomore year, Steven was independently reading grade-level texts, especially teen romance novels. This spring, he passed the California High School Exit Exam on the first try and earned a 4.0 grade point average. He is open about his progress and loves to tell his peers about his improvement. Stephen’s commitment to working hard to improve his skills exemplifies his growth mindset and is becoming one of the most respected students on our
Versyrus is a repeated kindergarten student attending Lake Forest Elementary School of the Arts and Sciences. He is receiving academic direct services with accommodations in an inclusive classroom. Versyrus is a very kind and friendly person who is very sensitive to the needs of his peers. However, he is very kind and friendly, Versyrus will completely shut down when frustrated. His academic strength is reading. He has excelled to the point of being on grade level. According to her i-ready results, Versyrus Test 1 and Test 2 overall scores increased from 338 to 370. He made a 32 point gain. He is on grade level in the areas of high-frequency words, vocabulary and comprehension informational text. He is able to recognize a few level K
Designing an individual intervention to increase reading fluency requires completion of assessments that will determine the child’s reading strengths and weaknesses. An inaccurate reader needs direct instruction on improving word recognition, which may include sight words and decodable words (which rules is the student not applying) at their instructional level. Once the goals have been established, in this case fluency, the intervention will begin with an introduction on fluency and word recognition.
During the assessment regarding concepts about print the three students I assessed (A,T,WG) performed at a level that I somewhat predicted but was still surprised by. The children that I assessed would need remediation understanding the formation of a book and how it is supposed to be read. As well as the difference between their right and left sides. If the teacher would read more often with the students and physically show them where to start reading in a book or what is a short word and what is a long word the students will get the practice they needs.
Jo’rel is a hard-working 4th grade male student in my Leveled Literacy Intervention (LLI) small group with a high intervention attendance rate. I-ready beginning of the year and end of the year assessments have Jo’rel improving from an “End of the Year first grade” level to a “Middle of the year third grader”. Looking at Jo’rel’s intervention record, he appears to not make any real progress (perhaps even moving back a little) – his accuracy decreased a slight bit and his comprehension dropped by half. However, I believe the topic of the book for this reading record, From Poop to Paper, hindered comprehension and accuracy. Jo’rel was very distracted, and a little off put, by having to read and discuss poop, so I am not sure if this last reading record accurately reflects his current ability.
Many students around the United States have reading difficulties, which can be due to a variety of reason such as: low socioeconomic status, family history of learning disabilities, a neurological disorder, limited exposure, etc. Reading difficulties can lead to further problems with education and learning, therefore the struggles should be addressed and intervention techniques should be implemented promptly. The interventions need to be individualized for the student based on their needs in order to improve the student’s reading to the best of their abilities.
Of the 27 programs evaluated, six showed strong indication of effectiveness and five had moderate evidence of effectiveness. The results for these programs were on language, literacy and/or phonological awareness. For some of the studies the significant effects were seen at the end of preschool (Direct Instruction, Interactive Book Reading), and for others at the end of kindergarten (Curiosity Corner, ELLM, Ready Set Leap!) (Johns Hopkins University, 35). It is programs that actually show results that improve academic and cognitive strength. That is why it is important to support and fund programs like these.