Over the last three months, there is a conflict going on between China and Hong Kong, because China 's powerful National People 's Congress Standing Committee revised the law of the way that Hong Kong picks its chief executive This policy made the people in Hong Kong extremely discontented, afterwards, many extremists in Hong Kong start the protest to fight against the Chinese government. There is no exact answer of which side is right until now. This paper is mainly supporting China side, and provide reasons why Hong Kong should make a concession for their economic development. Conflict between China and Hong Kong
Hong Kong should make the concession Recently, the people in Hong Kong has start a protest against the government of China.
…show more content…
Background
As mentioned above, China 's powerful National People 's Congress Standing Committee voted in August to change the way Hong Kong picks its chief executive. In the fresh law, it was ruling that every people in Hong Kong can have the right to vote for the chief executive now, but only people who are approved by China Communist Party able to be the candidates in the election. According to CNN news by Andrew Stevens:
A top Chinese official made clear the candidates all must "love the country and love Hong Kong." The city 's current leader insists it 's a step in the right direction. "The majority of Hong Kong citizens, namely, the 5 million qualified voters of the selection of chief executive in 2017, will be able to cast their votes to select the chief executive," said Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying. Speaking at an event Monday to explain the NPC 's decision, he added: "This is the first opportunity -- a very good opportunity -- for Hong Kong to have one man, one vote -- universal suffrage. This is something we should all feel proud of."(Para, 3)
But this is not the way that those protesters in Hong Kong see it. The group of Hong Kong protesters have vocally asked for elections in which any candidate can contend for the chief executive in Hong Kong. For weeks, protesters have taken to the streets.
Economic Inequality of Hong Kong
First, Hong Kong should make this concession is because worldwide, Hong Kong is now the city which has the biggest
The CCP, throughout its history, has been committed to maintaining a permanent monopoly on its political power over China and eradicated other parties, such as the KMT (Chinese Nationalist Party). The CCP doesn’t tolerate citizens who oppose its right to rule. In China’s own constitution, it says that the CCP will
Joshua Wong is a male teen activist who is now in his 20s. He fought during 2014 for democracy for Hong Kong and the rest of China. He had a political party named Scholarism, eventually, they split up and Joshua Wong now has a new political party, Demosistō. Both parties fought for democracy for China. He wants to fight for democracy for China because he does not like the current government system of the Chinese. Right now China is in a communist state/ like the Soviet Union was. A communist state is a type of government system in which the state plans and controls the economy and one single person (often an authoritarian) holds most of the power. Joshua Wong does not like this type of
Would the closer ties to the Chinese communist party have a bad influence on Hong Kong’s
Kaye Hong grown up in San Francisco and attended university of Washington. At the begging of his essay, he was not sure where he should lie his future in because he sees his future clearly in both China and America. Through half of his essay, we can tell that he is also considered China as a weak and low quality county by saying, “I shall deplore China’s lower standard of living, that the chaos of China’s government offers me no promise of economic security” (62). Although he had thought of go back to China, the bad living condition and insecure economy has immediately stopped his thinking. To put it differently, Hong is also lack of knowledge of China, and they way he looks at China’s future was incorrect. Indeed, at that time China’s economy and condition were not as good as today. But due to his enormous population, it is possible for its citizens to make it strong and rich, which this is also what the Stanford students are trying to express. However, Hong is very pessimistic with China’s
According to Lawrence (1998), the future of China will largely depend on its top leaders. Their priorities, reputations, and ability to get local officials and society at large to support their policies will shape the course of future events. At the vanguard of the group of up-and coming leaders is Hu Jintao, who joined the Communist Party’s most senior body, the seven-man politburo Standing Committee, at the age of 49 in 1992.
What is the tenet that China follows to ensure that Hong Kong’s exuberant capitalism is retained despite the communist leanings of mainland China?
Hong Kong and Taiwan have claimed independence from mainland China, but political concerns are arising. Since the ruling class controls the state power, China sought its own interest and define its interest as the interest of the nation-state. Liberals would argue that Tibet, Hong Kong, and Taiwan should be respected and allow them to self-govern. Even though, China wants to gain all forms of power with trying to get ahold of these countries, it will be more of a benefit to let them self-govern and try to work together. Chinese scholars began to engage the more orthodox intellectuals in the debate over china’s interest in the 1990s. Yet, according to Qin, he would argue that China was trying to establish somewhat of a liberalism concept. Qin could have this approach since China’s most important national interest was economic development and the most cost efficient way to realize that was from China to take under their power Tibet, Hong Kong, and
The Tiananmen Square Protests, otherwise known as the June Fourth incident, was a series of student led protests and demonstrations in Beijing, China during the spring of 1989. The protests were driven by goals to eliminate corruption within the Communist Party and promote democratic ideals such as freedom of speech, freedom of press and social equality. At the height of the protest from June 3-4, hundreds of thousands of students gathered around Tiananmen Square to protest, prompting military mobilization and resulting in unprecedented bloodshed. Though deemed by the Chinese government as a counter revolutionary act, the Tiananmen Square Protest remains an important event in shaping the political and social state of China today. Not only was the the protest instrumental in exposing the deep division within China’s political leadership, it also revealed that the future of China, comprised of students and intellectuals, was striving for a more democratic nation. With that being said, a highly debated question remains as to whether the Tiananmen Square Protest has led to more democracy in China, and how the event has influenced China’s political progress. On the contrary, the protest had a rather paradoxical impact on China’s regime. Rather than ending the rigid regime in place and bringing rise to democracy, Tiananmen led to the strengthening of the Communist party. The protests resulted
Notably, there is a protest by the Chinese student population occurring now. They want unrestrictive choosing of the next leader of Hong Kong (Hong Kong Protest Leader).While the revolution and protests have not shown their success in the direct form wanted yet, they share similar characteristics to the French revolution. The thought to be lower class, the students do not have a say even though they have the potential to be leaders in their country in the future. This has sparked protests in the financial and business districts halting actives and operations. In comparison to the French Revolution, both lower classes are calling for change. Students want a change in the election process, where currently government has to approve a candidate resulting in an often-biased process that does not allow for progression as a whole (Rauhala, A New Generation).This has been an ongoing issue, and when it had built up over the years among a group it finally caused these protests. The government was the cause as were they in the French Revolution. The students want a change in how their government operates that has been central to the running of government for
Government officials were divided over what direction they wanted to take the country. Reformers pushed for political liberalization and a plurality of ideas while conservatives believed there was too much reform and so greater state control was needed to ensure social stability to better align with China’s socialist ideals. These problems are what led to the protests of students and citizens. During the time period in which the Tiananmen Square protests began, there were many viewpoints against the government and their ideas. While
China has been a communist country since the communist revolution took place in 1949, since then China has been ruled by the dictator Mao Tse-Tung. However the Chinese dictator died in September 1976, he was hailed abroad as one of the worlds’ great leaders. Certainly one of the more impressive aspects of the Chinese communist government, has been the willingness of the people to protest against it (3, pg. 4).
The Tiananmen Square protest occurred in 1989 in Beijing, China and was primarily student led. Protesters were anxious about the country’s future with political elites, and no longer wanted a communist regime. In 1980, government reforms left the economy in a disaster, which benefited only a certain few private citizens and government elites. Grievances included “inflation, limited preparedness of graduates for the new economy, and restrictions on political participation.” (edcuationrays) Students desired democracy, freedom of speech and press, and more accountability - all inspired by Westerners. When leader Hu Yaobang died, people took to Tiananmen Square to protest. At its height, one million individuals occupied the Square. In response, China’s new leader, Deng Xiaoping, used force and declared martial law. As a result, 300,000 troops were sent to Beijing, leading to widespread arrests and deaths. This event is extremely important because it led to more intense sanctions on the citizens of China - the opposite of what they hoped. The government responded by suppressing freedom of press and speech and there was negative implication on international trade . By analyzing grievance theory, relative deprivation, and collective action and how these describe how citizens protested in Tiananmen Square, we can see why the protest erupted. Yet, it is not obvious by the theories why the protest was unsuccessful and why the government responded with more
The movement that conveyed Hong Kong people’s discontent with the British colonial government is the Hong Kong Leftist riots in 1967. After the breakout of the Cultural Revolution in China, pro-communist leftists in Hong Kong actively found opportunities to cause conflicts against the colonial government. The labor disputes at the Hong Kong Artificial Flower Factory were a perfect time to instigate Hong Kong people to oppose its colonial government. Along with the success of leftists demonstrations in Macau and Hong Kong’s social conflicts stemmed from poor working conditions, the disputes developed into large-scale demonstrations against British colonial rule. Many pro-communist demonstrators shouted Mao’s slogans with Little Red Books held in their hands. At the end of the demonstrations without the supports of Hong Kong citizens, the riots failed and were discontinued by the first Premier of the People 's Republic of China, Zhou Enlai.
The State Council of the Peoples Republic of China violates the Hong Kong Basic Law by purposefully creating a pro-Beijing majority in the Hong Kong Election Committee and thus denies citizens participation in the election of their Chief Executive. This social injustice forms part of a larger social justice struggle whereby the autonomy of Hong Kong is slowly being eroded by Central Government control.
In mid 2002, the Vice Premier of the State Council expressed Beijing’s desire for Hong Kong to pass the proposals as soon as possible. Then, the Tung Chee-hwa, the Chief Executive of Hong Kong began the drafting of the article, and passed it to the legislative council.