Relativist, Contextualist, Absolutist Relativist “is the concept that points of view have no absolute truth or validity, having only relative, subjective value according to differences in perception and consideration.” (Slick, 2015) Moral relativism goes off a person’s moral principles, where principles and ethics are observed as valid in only limited situations. There are many forms of relativism which vary in their degree of disagreement; also known as truth relatives. (Slick, 2015)
Contextualism describes a collection of views in philosophy which emphasize the context in which an achievement, exclamation, or countenance occurs, and argues that, in some importance can only be understood by the context in which it is used. “Contextualist
…show more content…
(Virtue Ethincs, 2015)
The difference between these is that morality tends to lie more in the ways in which problems are approached, rather than in the ethically moral conclusion.. A virtue ethicist focuses less on lying and instead considers what a decision to tell a lie or not tell a lie said about a person’s character and moral behavior a person has. (Virtue Ethincs, 2015)
Research has shown that the best plausible explanation of an example of virtue ethics is stealing. Stealing is moral ethics as a person you can choose to steal from someone, something that you want more than anything; versus purchasing that same item by working your tail off and earning the money the proper way to get what you desire more. This will not only get a person what they want but helps them to feel good doing so.
…show more content…
Utility is defined in various ways, but is usually related to the well-being of sentient entities.” (Act and Rule Utilitarianism, 2015) Jeremy Bentham was the founder of Utilitarianism, he defined utility as” the aggregate pleasure after deducting suffering of all involved in any action.” Later in time a man by the name of John Stuart Mill extended the concept of utility to include not only the quantity, by focusing on rules, instead of individual moral actions. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, which states that actions between right and wrong have consequences. Some believe that one’s intentions are also ethically important. (Act and Rule Utilitarianism,
An ethical virtue is a habit that you inclined toward. Virtue is not simply one isolated action but an overall habit of acting in a certain way. To be virtuous, a person must knowingly and deliberately be conscious of the
Moral Relativism is defined as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. This carries the impression that what you respect as a right behavior may be a right conduct for you, but not for me. Moral Relativism is an attempt to
According to moral relativism, there are no guidelines as to what is considered right or wrong, therefore we are unable to judge one’s beliefs. The two types of relativism are individual and cultural. Individual relativism is the view that each person creates their own standards, while cultural relativism is that the societies create moral standard which are authoritative over the people. The founder of relativism, Protagoras, said “man is the measure of all things- of all things that are, and of things that they are not.” This ideally means that each person sets their own standards of truth by their own judgements. Moral relativism is practically the idea that a given thing is based upon the perception from which it is viewed.
Virtue ethics is concerned with the traits of character that make one a good person. Virtue ethics seems to be more personal because it is not about choosing which side of an issue one would prefer to take part in, but the kind of person one wants to be. A virtuous person is considered to be a morally good person, and virtues are good traits. For virtue ethics, the moral life is about developing good character.
The virtue based ethical theories places more emphasis on helping people develop good character traits, for example, in “courage combined with honesty is needed for health professionals to admit that they mistakenly took the wrong treatment approach” (Purtilo & Doherty, 2015), and honesty to effectively communicate with others like patients and their families. Virtue ethics can also be seen in other professions, such as law enforcement because they also have to have good character traits to help people. I do believe this argument succeeds in helping manage inevitable ethical
Virtue ethics is someone who does their duty or the right thing for the right reasons
Virtue ethics is considered as one of the three major approaches in normative ethics. The founding fathers of Virtue ethics are Plato and more particularly Aristotle. “It suffered a momentary eclipse during the nineteenth century but re-emerged in the late 1950’s in Anglo-American philosophy” (Virtue Ethics , 2012). The re-emergence had an effect on the other two approaches. The consequence of this is the fact that is now necessary to distinguish “virtue ethics” from “virtue theory. Kant’s virtue theory has conveyed philosophers’ attention to Kant’s “Doctrine of Virtue” and the utilitarian’s have developed consequentialist virtue theories. “A virtue such as honesty or generosity is not just a tendency to do what is honest or generous, nor
Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that holds the morally right course of action in any given situation is the course of which yields the greatest balance of benefits over harms. More specifically, utilitarianism’s core idea is that the effects of an action determine whether actions are morally right or wrong. Created with the philosophies of Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873), Utilitarianism began in England in the 19th Century. Bentham and Mill built their system of Utilitarianism on ancient hedonism (pursuing physical pleasure and avoiding physical pain). Although both of these philosophers agreed on the basic principals of Utilitarianism they disagreed on what exactly hedonism is.
Relativism is the theory that doesn't support universal moral right and wrong. Subjective relativism states that each persons has their own decision about the right and wrong regardless of the moral norms.
Virtue Ethics seems to be focusing what the individual should choose for their own personal actions instead of individual relying on the external laws and customs of the person's culture, and if a person's character is good then so ought the person's choices and
John Stuart Mill was responsible for putting forth the utilitarian ethical theory. Utilitarianism is a theory which states the best action is one which maximizes one’s utility. This utility is usually defined as the well-being of humans and sentient animals. Utility is also defined as the sum of all pleasure that results from an action, minus the suffering of anyone involved. In other words, if an act performed is done for the greater good of humanity, it is morally right whether or not some people are harmed in the process.
Virtue ethics is a theory that focuses on character development and what virtues one should obtain to be who they are supposed to be, as oppose to actions. An example of virtue ethics would be someone who is patient, kind, loving, generous, temperance, courage and flourishing as oppose to a person who lies, cheats, and
There are many strengths and weaknesses to virtue ethics that can be discussed, but they both have a main strength and weakness that could be talked about. One primary strength of virtue ethics is character traits this is how we use are virtues to help other people and make them better. People should have respect, love, and compassion for one another these are what a person should have in them innately to help others out because it’s the way you are instead of doing just because you should. The main weakness of virtue ethics that people argue is that it does not have focus of what is supposed to be morally right and wrong in the first place even though we know that something like murder is not moral virtue ethics doesn’t really ask this question.
Utilitarianism is one of the most commonly used ethical theories from the time it was formulated by Jeremy Bentham and John Stewart Mill in the nineteenth century. In his work, Utilitarianism, Bentham “sought to dispel misconceptions that morality has nothing to do with usefulness or utility or that morality is opposed to pleasure” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 53). To simplify the utilitarian principle, which is one of utility, one can surmise that morality is equated with the greatest amount of utility or good for the greatest number of people (MacKinnon, 2012). Also, with its orientation to the “end or goal of actions” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 54), Utilitarianism thus, espouses the consequentialist principle, e.g., the evaluation of any human act lies not so much in the nature of the act or the drive behind the act but rather the result of the act (MacKinnon, 2012).
Everyone in this world is instilled with a set of values that we use as guidelines to dictate our decisions we make in our life. That affect not only our interaction with others but also with how we subconsciously treat ourselves. A simple explanation of what a virtuous ethic would be something along the lines of “How do I live a life that isn’t simply good but also based around good morality?” We use these kinds of ethics to guide us through the righteous path, the morally good path, and the paths that we believe lead to our own prosperity of the good life. But honestly what in the world is the hard facts on virtue ethics let me break it down for you.