preview

Relativist, Contextualist, Absolutist

Decent Essays

Relativist, Contextualist, Absolutist Relativist “is the concept that points of view have no absolute truth or validity, having only relative, subjective value according to differences in perception and consideration.” (Slick, 2015) Moral relativism goes off a person’s moral principles, where principles and ethics are observed as valid in only limited situations. There are many forms of relativism which vary in their degree of disagreement; also known as truth relatives. (Slick, 2015)
Contextualism describes a collection of views in philosophy which emphasize the context in which an achievement, exclamation, or countenance occurs, and argues that, in some importance can only be understood by the context in which it is used. “Contextualist …show more content…

(Virtue Ethincs, 2015)
The difference between these is that morality tends to lie more in the ways in which problems are approached, rather than in the ethically moral conclusion.. A virtue ethicist focuses less on lying and instead considers what a decision to tell a lie or not tell a lie said about a person’s character and moral behavior a person has. (Virtue Ethincs, 2015)
Research has shown that the best plausible explanation of an example of virtue ethics is stealing. Stealing is moral ethics as a person you can choose to steal from someone, something that you want more than anything; versus purchasing that same item by working your tail off and earning the money the proper way to get what you desire more. This will not only get a person what they want but helps them to feel good doing so. …show more content…

Utility is defined in various ways, but is usually related to the well-being of sentient entities.” (Act and Rule Utilitarianism, 2015) Jeremy Bentham was the founder of Utilitarianism, he defined utility as” the aggregate pleasure after deducting suffering of all involved in any action.” Later in time a man by the name of John Stuart Mill extended the concept of utility to include not only the quantity, by focusing on rules, instead of individual moral actions. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, which states that actions between right and wrong have consequences. Some believe that one’s intentions are also ethically important. (Act and Rule Utilitarianism,

Get Access