Robotic Surgery Involves Performing Laparoscopic Or Minimally Invasive Surgery ( Mis )

Ben-Or, S., Nifong, W., & Chitwood, W. (2013). Robotic Surgical Training. The Cancer Journal, 19(2), 120-123.

Al). This includes the increase in dexterity, the restore of proper hand-eye coordination, and improvement of visualization (Meyers et al.). In Cameron Scott’s article from the Healthline News, “Is da Vinci Robotic Surgery a Revolution or a Ripoff?,” he states that robotic devices including the da Vinci surgical device succeeds well in urology and the removal of prostate. Prostate removal is extremely difficult for open surgery practice, however the da Vinci made is easier with about 90 percent of these kinds of surgeries are now done robotically (Scott). Some evidence even suggest that with robotics used in prostatectomy, there is less blood loss, faster recovery, and fewer internal scarring (Scott.). There are many other examples from hospitals and manufactures that support the uses of robotic surgery and its benefits. However, even though these new technologies of robotic devices are supposedly be helping patients and making surgeries less invasive, they are still many concerns of how they should be properly regulated.

Exploratory laparotomy is a surgical procedure to examine the organs inside your belly (abdomen). Another name for this is abdominal exploration. You may have this procedure if you have abdominal pain, trauma, bleeding, infection, or obstruction. The procedure may be done if your health care provider cannot make a diagnosis from an exam and testing alone.

Imagine a place where robots can not only decrease mistakes, but it can also save many lives during dangerous and high risk surgeries. I have had friends and family have these procedures done, and it was helpful and successful. Telerobotic surgeries are helpful, it prevents less to no mistakes, less deaths, and makes procedures easier.

One of the most important aspects to any new technique in healthcare is to develop enough information to decide if the benefits outweigh the risks. According to the Wall Street Journal, in 2000, there were only 1,000 robotic surgeries globally. That number increased to 360,000 in 2011 and 450,000 last year (Pinkerton, 2013). Almost all sources, including the da Vinci Surgical System website, have specified that for the patient, who receives robotic surgery, usually experiences less blood loss, a shorter hospital stay and less dependence on postoperative pain medication. There is also a benefit in cosmetics where there is no evidence of big scars since robotic surgery instruments enter through tiny incisions (da Vinci Surgical System, 2015). Benefits related to the surgeon include decreased back pain and greater range of motion and precision. This is because the procedures do not have the surgeons constantly bending over an operating table for however long the surgery would take. According to Becker (2012), the enhanced screen with 3D like image and three interactive robotic arms, all with the capability of achieving range of motion greater than the human

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is a minimally invasive procedure to remove the entire prostate gland and the seminal vesicles. This procedure is done to treat prostate cancer that has not spread to other parts of the body (metastasized). The goal of the procedure is to remove all cancer cells and to prevent prostate cancer from metastasizing.

As technology improves, surgical robots are rapidly gaining support among both doctors and patients across America. Today more than 900 hospitals have the da Vinci robot which is double the number in 2007. (Freyer, 2010) Da Vinci robots were first approved by the FDA in 2000 for prostate removal, but now da Vinci robots are used for a variety of other surgical procedures (Freyer, 2010). Robot assisted surgery offers advantages such as smaller incisions, reduced blood loss, less pain and faster healing time (Vijay, 2010), as well as making surgery less demanding for the surgeon. Robotic surgery involves many obvious advantages but the impact of cost, access, and quality must

This includes the increase in dexterity, the restore of proper hand-eye coordination, and improvement of visualization (Meyers et al.). In Cameron Scott’s article from the Healthline News, “Is da Vinci Robotic Surgery a Revolution or a Ripoff?,” he states that robotic devices including the da Vinci surgical device succeeds well in urology and the removal of prostate. Prostate removal is extremely difficult for open surgery practice, however the da Vinci made is easier with about 90 percent of these kinds of surgeries are now done robotically (Scott). Some evidence even suggest that with robotics used in prostatectomy, there is less blood loss, faster recovery, and fewer internal scarring according to reports mention in Eastham’s article (Eastham et al.). There are many other examples from hospitals and manufactures that support the uses of robotic surgery and its benefits. However, even though these new technologies of robotic devices are supposedly be helping patients and making surgeries less invasive, they are still many concerns of how they should be properly regulated.

The 21st century can rightfully be considered as the era of technology when the new inventions and discoveries will most likely affect all the segments of human life. At this point, some of the breakthrough inventions of our times have been in the medical field. Robotic surgery has become an almost common practice in the advanced medical world and new uses for robotic assisted surgery are everyday set in place. However, such developments also attract different interests and implications.

Minimally Invasive Surgical (MIS) techniques have developed in many areas, from vascular and neurosurgery, to genitourinary surgery, assisting physicians to perform highly intricate procedures every day with the help of MIS techniques. Barry (2011) states, “Recent estimates suggest that as many as 85% of all radical prostatectomies are now being done laparoscopically with robotic assistance.” These techniques have given the opportunity for patients to encounter less pain, faster recoveries, and smaller scars allowing patients to return to regular daily activities sooner. Additionally, robot surgeons Gerhardus (2003) stated “ Minimally Invasive surgery reduces the amount of inpatient hospital

With the ever-expanding medical field, I believe the next breakthrough will be advancements in robotic assisted surgeries. While it exists today, and helps in certain routine medical procedure, there is a huge potential in this field of biomedical engineering. The current procedures entail the use of a robotic mechanism that copies the movements of a doctor on a microscale that allows for less invasive surgery. With an almost tripling amount of procedures being performed since 2007, the potential of the surgical system is indeed beneficial. With the implementations of the current system on a larger scale, the medical field will expand exponentially. As the procedures become more common, the cost will decrease as competition in the market

The Da Vinci Surgical System is a large purpose-built robot controlled by a surgeon that performs minimally invasive surgical procedures on patients. The system incorporates an ergonomically designed surgeon's console, a patient-side module with four interactive robotic arms, each with interchangeable surgical instruments and a 3-dimensional endoscopic vision system. Powered by high-tech supercomputers, the surgeon's hand movements are scaled, filtered and then converted into precise movements of the surgical attachments. The designers of the system are a team of doctors, engineers and biomedical engineers at a company called Intuitive Surgical.

Throughout an operation, the robots make instrument handling more natural. Furthermore, with the help of surgical robots, doctors can avoid unnecessary movements to change tools and to look at the monitor (Lanfranco, Castellanos, Desai, & Meyers, 2004). This is beneficial because this allows the surgeon to solely focus on the surgery and to get the job done more quickly and efficiently. Moreover, the three dimensional sight from the robot is much more clear compared to the usual laparoscopic camera. All these advantages of robotic surgery tremendously help surgeons with identifying and dissecting body parts (Lanfranco, Castellanos, Desai, & Meyers, 2004). Therefore, this advanced technology can make surgeries more effective and less difficult.

A laparoscopic approach appears to be associated with a reduction in surgical trauma and blood loss. In addition, it is presumable that some of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery such as reduced analgesic requirements, a shorter recovery period and reduced hospital stay (Kuhry, 2005). It has become a forerunner in the quest of improving surgical results by dropping postoperative pain and lessening recovery time. Yet, the use of laparoscopic instruments can be awkward and cumbersome, thus escalating operative time and dropping dexterity, which can

The beginning use of surgical robots within medical setting benefits the surgeon as well as the patient; it gives the da Vinci Surgical System a bright future within today’s society.