preview

S. Aureus Crystal Structure

Decent Essays

MOL350 paper #1 (Dawson & Locher, 2006) discusses the crystal structure of S. aureus
Sav1866 ABC transporter protein and its relationship to the function of the transporter. Encoding
Sav1866 was amplified by PCR, fused to Nterminal decahistidine affinity tag in a modified T7 expression vector, purified in octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether, and analyzed crystallographically at the beamline X06SA of the Swiss Light Source. Dawson & Locher note that the part of the nucleotidebinding domains (NBDs) in contact with the transmembrane domain (TMDs) is “primarily lined with residues around the socalled
'Qloop’”
(183), with notable exceptions at Tyr 391 (corresponds to 409 on Ste6, which is also a Tyr) and Glu 473
(which corresponds to 501 on Ste6, where there …show more content…

The
A339G mutation (which corresponds to Ste6 position 298, which is a histidine rather than phenylalanine) replaced Ala with more hydrophilic Gly, resulting in can be seen in the figure to reduce resistance to all drugs except VCR. A339S with a similar hydrophilic substitution similarly reduced the resistance to all drugs. The A339D mutation, however, with the most hydrophilic substitution of Asp, did not significantly affect the resistance of three of the drugs except VCR, whose resistance was doubled. These mutations are interesting because they typify the effects of replacing hydrophobic residues with hydrophilic ones. Furthermore, the A339D mutation demonstrates that hydropathicity alone does not explain drug recognition, as Gly was the most hydrophilic yet did not reduce resistance.
Rao (1995) describes the alteration of the ATPase function in human MDR1 protein due to mutation G185V (which corresponds to 185 on Ste6, where there is instead a serine). The mutation was produced by standard recombinant DNA techniques: a 4.2kb
SacIIXhoI
fragment was inserted into pHaMDRGa as a template, amplified by PCR, cloned into M13

Get Access