Schools Should Not Give Gpa For Sports Essay

Who would want a lower GPA just because of their gym grade? Gym grades should not affect a student’s GPA because school is a place to learn, it is a way for students to get bullied, and students need exercise but by the time they are in middle and high school they should be responsible enough to get enough exercise. Therefore gym should be optional and not count towards a student’s GPA.

Colleges frequently refer to a student's GPA when they apply, since it can provide a nice summary of them academically. Gym is not a purely academic class, however. It is difficult to improve a Gym grade by studying a worksheet or taking better notes. Colleges, therefore, are examining athletic achievements along with academic ones, which is unfair. It is unrealistic to think it matters that “the debate team captain cannot get a home run. It should not be a huge deal that the valedictorian cannot swim.”(Hakimian and Kim 1). A GPA can be the only way you are accepted into a college for some people, or even the only chance you have at a scholarship. Two people could have the exact same grades in every class except Gym, giving one a slightly higher GPA, making them more likely to receive a academic scholarship than the other. The higher GPA is not a result of better academic ability, but athletic ability, which should not be considered for a scholarship based on your academics. GPA starts to be influenced by athletic ability when you include Gym, and for those who are not, it is shutting down windows of freedom for

When participation in a sport in high school, it may interfere with class work, meaning an athlete may have to leave class early in order to participate in a game or tournament. With doing so, it is up to the student to get their work done. They have to make it up on their own time in order to make up what they missed in class. This teaches students time management and motivates students to try their best in order to make up work they missed. All coaches should take into consideration that if a student does not have the grades, then the athlete may not participate in competition or practice. Even this rule applies to the team’s best athlete, grade ineligibility applies to everyone. When it comes to high school, the sport itself generates motivation to keep the student on top of things and wanting to thrive for greatness in academics and athletics as well (“Merkel,”). All students should know that grades come before athletics. This will make student athletes aware of the minimum GPA that will be needed to be maintained in order to participate in athletics (“The Benefits of Participating in Sports”). Consequently, it forces students to learn

Students should not be able to play sports with a low GPA. Students should have good grades to play sports, because it is not fair to other students who play sports and keep their grades up. You can not get into college just for sports. You need to have a high GPA too. Other people need sports to help them get good grades. Student athletes should have to maintain a certain grade point average to participate in sports because it helps them develop life skills, gives them a future, and helps them with their confidence.

School sports have the same purpose as regular physical education classes; they both ensure to stay healthy and help students exercise. If thats the case, many student-athletes are wondering why they need a physical education class in high school. Student athletes should be exempt from physical education classes because less chance of injuries and instead have the choice to take other course electives.

Academic success is important for both high school and college athletes. To be eligible to participate, athletes must maintain a certain GPA. Student athletes that don’t make school a priority, not only miss out on playing time, but also fail to prepare themselves for the next step in their life. For high school athletes, that means prepare for college while for college athlete, it means preparing to enter the workforce. Although, both high school and

And just saying guys, college loves when students get in all these activities, this means that kids really pride in something that they love so much. But, if you take this away from them, then they won’t get into the college that they want to. Kids need to do sports to be healthy, have fun, and follow their dreams. Don’t say I am wrong because I know the pros and cons of playing a sport. Yes, sports are easy and hard, you can get hurt while playing it, but if you love it and dedicate for yourself and others then you should do it. No mayor and school board should take this away from you and others. They want us to have a good education than to do something we love to do. They want us to worry more about school work then to worry about what we have to do outside of school. Kids need the sports to know that they have a talent in something and know that it's something that they love to do. Kids need education in sport right? Yes, yes they do. Kids should be able to go to a college for any activity that they are interested with and know that they love. In conclusion, no mayor or school board should take away a sport knowing that is what you want to do in life and

Primarily, a “C” average should not be required for student athletes to play sports on a school team because it discourages many students. A student may be born to be an athlete, but can be struggling to keep up academically in school. If a student is rejected from playing the sport they love because of their other struggles, this will discourage them. This can hurt a student. For example, a student may reject a challenging, but interesting class in fear of getting a bad grade. **Opponents of this argument may say that forcing students to have a “C” average will encourage them to do well in school.** In reality, a student will be dejected enough to drop out of school. In other words, some students may give up completely, rather than trying

Should high school athletes be required to have a 2.5 GPA to play? Considering athletics consume a significant amount of time, athletes should set time aside for academics as well. Student athletes should have at least 2.5 GPA to be eligible for a sport because they need to give 100% for both school and sports, managing their time, and also are held to a higher expectation.

Allowing a kid or teenager to play football gives them motivation to succeed in life, because they will do anything they can to keep their grades up to play. Although we give students a minimum GPA of 2.0, it would be more beneficial to the students

High school sports make student athletes strive for better success in their education. Sure some Schools have a minimum G.P.A requirement of 2.0, and to get that all your classes have to be “C” or better. Well that’s better than letting them have a 1.0 and letting them play. It makes them have something worth studying for, For example my friend Bryan Garcia does not like school or work but he is always looking for ways to make his grades better so that he may play with the John F. Kennedy soccer team. Also not all the states in the United States of America have a G.P.A requirement to play in a sport activity, twelve out of the fifty states in the USA require a G.P.A to play."A High School Athlete 's GPA Vs. Average High School Student 's GPA." Everyday Life. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Feb. 2016.”Sports participation is associated with higher GPAs, lower dropout rates and stronger commitments to school compared to the average,non-athlete high school student”. Also they made a study for Kansas in 2008-2009 between athletes and non-athletes,Academic Performance Of Athletes And Non‐Athletes, and Page 41. COMPARING THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES IN KANSAS IN 2008-2009 (n.d.): n. pag. Web.”high school athletes earned higher grades,graduated at a higher rate, dropped out of school less frequently, and scored higher on state assessments than did non-athletes”. Student athletes have a greater chance of graduating with a 3.0 or more. They are more

To make things fair and to give credit where credit is due, it would only be right if student athletes got paid for their performance especially if the school is making money because of their skills.

First of all, student athletes when they leave high school, they will not be able to maintain the grades needed to pass because they were used to low standards in the past. The GPA needed to play sports is right around 2.3 according to NCAA. If you have good grades, you are more likely to be chosen over another student with poor grades, to receive a sports scholarship to college. Some students get good grades for just one quarter. But when they get to college they will not be able to maintain the grade for the entire year. What good does it do if you can’t keep your grades in college? It does you no good! If you

Hi my name is Tanika Munroe, I attend Piscataway High School. I am writing to you today concerning the matter of students having to receive a B average or higher in order to participate in clubs or sports. In my school I already see such a matter going on. If students don’t maintain a certain grade they are put on something called a sports leave or sports tutoring. This is so the players can get their grade up so that they can continue to play on the team. I strongly believe that this is unfair because for one it is hard for someone to get used to multitasking I can speak on this myself. You might say its’ something one person can get used to but this is not true, not everyone can get used to something like that. Secondly, there are kids who play sports that may have learning disabilities, there should be exceptions for students like that. Lastly, academics do come first but, I believe that sports and clubs are some of the reasons students look forward to coming to school.

Interestingly though, a source that did agree with the evidence that athletes receive higher GPA’s in school than do non-athletes, went on the explain how athletics were degrading to the academic experience gained during high school. Hauser and Lueptow (1978) go on to explain in their article, “Participation in Athletics and Academic Achievement: A Replication and Extension”, that high school athletes do not gain as much during the high school years as do non-athletes, thus experiencing a relative decline in overall achievement. They seem to think hard work in athletics will cause less retaining of information learned in school in the long run. While Hauser and Lueptow (1978) explained in their article that this claim was backed by research done by others in the past, I was unable