The best way to study is highly debated in the academic and educational world as it has been suggested by Credé and Kunzel (2008) that the habits and strategies students engage in whilst studying correlates with how well they perform academically. With this in mind, many researchers have now begun conducting numerous studies into the field of studying techniques, in order for students to learn and partake in the techniques that have been suggested to be the most effective and beneficial in their use. Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan & Willingham (2013) composed a research article, exploring ten main studying techniques including highlighting, self-explanation and practice testing, which therefore allowed students to empirically evaluate …show more content…
why material is true of one situation but not another), creating the idea that Elaborative Interrogation effects are often bigger when only learning about a constrained topic as a larger amount of prior knowledge is needed to gain a fuller understanding. This statement is supported by Woloshyn, Presley & Schneider (1992) who gave Canadian and German students facts addressing Canadian provinces and German states. It was discovered, after doing a final test, that those in a high-knowledge domain had a mean increase of correct answers by 24% whereas those in a low- knowledge domain only increased by 12%. This emphasises that those with prior knowledge will benefit most from this technique as they seem to be more equipped to begin with, resulting in higher academic success. However on the other hand, it suggests that Elaborative Interrogation can only be used when studying very specific topics, making it time-consuming and impractical for an individual like a Psychology student to use when revising for an examination. Elaboration Interrogation has not yet been adequately tested in many educational situations, meaning we cannot generalise the results to students wishing to discover the best technique for themselves.
In direct juxtaposition to this, Elaborative Interrogation has shown to be effective throughout a large variety of learners (age and ability). Even though a large
Oral questioning can also assess how they are learning, rephrasing questions if learners are finding it difficult to answer
Verbal questioning can be used to gauge the learner’s knowledge, the questions could be rephrased if the learner did not understand the question and also gives the opportunity to expand on questioning. Some learners may find verbal questions intimidating. Video evidence would have to be used as there would be no real evidence, some learners may not take well to this.
In the book ‘’How We Learn’’ Benedict Carey teaches readers that learning doesn't have to be an isolated chore but more a part of living. The author gives readers tactics and strategies that can be used when studying to make learning and test taking easier. Readers will be able to use these techniques in their daily lives.
This student’s preferred learning strategy compared to the learning strategy provided by V.A.R.K. is almost identical. The learning strategies that have been used throughout her education have always netted good results, which is evident by her grades. In the past other students have commented about her learning style and the amount of time spent on note taking, outlines, and writing out note cards, but she has perfected this process for her learning style.
“The way teacher questions are worded does make a difference in student response.” (Herman, 2008 pp. 16) Herman (2008) found that teachers were more likely to elicit extended answers through the use of more open-ended questions. After reading these articles, I was convinced that I needed to improve my own questioning skills, which lead me to use the SATIC model for a self-evaluation of my use of questioning in the classroom.
After reading the article I want to change my study habits some. My goal is to implement the strategy previously mentioned. I think self-testing myself as I read will allow for much more long term absorption of material. In addition, to increasing the skills in how I read I want to learn to create study questions for myself. When study guides are not provided it’s easy to feel overwhelmed with the idea of exams. However, we can train ourselves to recognize important information and create our own study questions to be able to answer before exam day. Self-testing and self-created study questions are going to my new approach at studying.
The first two chapters of “What the Best College Students Do” cover several topics. Throughout the chapters, the lives and experiences of different college students are explored. A reoccurring theme in the book is the concept of learning styles. Essentially, the three learning styles are memorization, comprehension, and strategy. According to the author, comprehension is the most effective style of learning. While everyone will possess one of these three learning styles, it is not impossible for someone to adjust to another style. Additionally, the author elaborates on academic ideas such as independence, grades, and outside influences.
“The more typical view of learning resembles the mental equivalent of consumerism: the more knowledge we acquire, the better 'educated' we think we are. But as some of the leading researchers and practitioners in the field have observed, such education 'focuses more on memorization and static answers rather than on the art of seeking new possibilities through dynamic questioning.' Instead of teaching students 'how to ask powerful
Shellenbarger presents five ways to improve your study skills. Through other people’s experiences and studies Shellenbarger is able to support her claim of the helpful tips for getting the most from your studying while appealing to her audience through her organization and relevant references.
After seeing the video of professor Chew’s talk on “How to get the most out of studying, part 1” I realize the mistakes I’m doing when I’m studying. I been doing the same mistake since high school and now I know why I was struggling so much in some classes. Because I was multitasking most of the time when I was studying and being over confidents about knowing the topic I wasted a lot of time learning.
examination. Questions construct an establishment for exchange, a procedure which is essential to social learning
We are living in a modern world. It requires us the good memory or a good way to catch up; however, the memory is limit. The great man is the ordinary human that works by strategy. A good method for studying is important. This will give good scores, protect our health from stresses and create the creative value because the new knowledge will turn into the old one. My three-rule method is the faith, the goal and the time.
Though the use of note-taking and rereading is most notably known as the best study technique amongst college students, we see that other ways of retaining information can be more beneficial than that of writing notes and reading them over before exams. The article at hand tests the idea of a 3R method which is the use of reading, recalling, and reviewing information instead of traditional study methods. The usage of the 3R strategy in studying is seen as more effective than traditional note-taking, due to the 3R strategy being able to increase the chances of recalling information
this sounds counterintuitive because, essentially by studying less, you can actually learn more. Of course, one reason why testing is not a popular studying technique is because testing is often regarded as the evil of education. Paradoxically, it is just this difficulty that makes them such effective study tools, research suggests. Rereading information often gives the false impression that you are learning the material because the task itself does not take much work to do. Students often reread materials to study, almost as if they expect the information will seep into their brains just as syrup seeps into the cavities of a waffle. The more mental sweat it takes to dig out the information, the more securely it will be subsequently anchored. Practice testing is an informal kind of testing in which you can assess your own learning performance. It is informal compared to exams, so it has no far-reaching consequences. You can practice testing in any form such as using flashcards, doing problems at the ends of textbook chapters or taking the practice tests that professors often post prior to the exam. Unlike many of the other study techniques, the benefits of practice testing are not modest – studies have found that a practice test can double free recall! These two principles (spacing and testing) can be combined to potentially maximize the benefits – i.e. practice with a set of flashcards on Day 1, again on Day 3 and then again on Day 5, etc. ELABORATE ON MORE WAYS TO
The participants were all subjected to different forms of questioning. Some data was collected through observation. Other data was through interviews of the participants’ parents and teachers. Other data was collected through self-report. No consistent method was used originally.