Everywhere around the United States, there are troubled adolescents who are able to either get away with crimes or have little consequence if they are caught. According to the office of juvenile justice and delinquency prevention, there were about 300,000 violent crimes in the United States. These crimes include manslaughter, murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Although, the number is lower than two decades ago, the number is still present. There are punk kids out in the world who take advantage of the criminal justice system. They may be violent offenders, but the justice system takes it easy on them. I believe that teens should be tried as adults in the court of law because the adolescents have control of themselves, if a children commits a heinous crime they should not be taken easily, and children understand crimes at a younger age. There was a boy who killed his English teacher, this is a horrible thing to do and the boy received 70 years in prison, but in April 2006, a twelve year old girl killed her entire family with the help of her twenty-three year old boyfriend Jeremy Steinke. The girl was convicted of multiple first degree murders, but she was only given 10 years. Meaning, a girl who was willing to kill …show more content…
If a person believes that the crime outweighs the risk because they will not be charged tough, the person will commit the crime. Kids today need to be frightened enough to not commit a crime, there is a television show called "Beyond Scared Straight". In this show, there are kids who commit crimes like assault, battery, or drinking alcohol, they are opted into this program to try to straighten them out. They get real prisoners to scare them. The kids start out acting touch, but eventually they crack and begin to cry and beg to go home. More often than not the children get back on track and do not advance to worse
Today in society crimes are majority made by minors, I believe that when they investigate about the person looking at the background of the adolescent being tried. They see that they came from a bankrupt family, they live in a segregated area,and have high rates of learning disabilities, mental health and abuse problems.But also being tried like an adult when making a violent crime I don't think is truly effective for these juveniles to understand what they did was wrong giving them the right help and giving them the chance to turn around their
What is the point of sending juveniles to federal prison if when they get out they haven't learned their lesson and keep committing crimes? Why is it that a state that raised its family court’s age limit now has the lowest number of young adult prisoners in its adult prisons? These are questions I have been asking myself for the past couple of weeks, and while thinking, I have come to the consensus that juveniles should not be charged as adults for violent crimes.
Teens should be trialed as adult juvenile offenders because it’s too many of teenagers our age walking around toting guns, killing others amongst us, and making our environment unsafe and not serving the appropriate amount of punishment time because their known as “minors”. As I see it, if you can’t do the time you shouldn’t do the crime. If you can commit an adult crime and get caught for it, you can sit in a cell and do the time permitted to you. If you can be 15/16 years old and out here shooting and killing victims, why shouldn’t you be tried as an adult? That’s a huge deal! It’s something that shouldn’t be counted lightly for. Taking a life away from
The ongoing argument on juvenile teens that kill should be tried as an adult. Yes, I think teens who have committed such a horrendous crime like killing someone should be tried as an adult. If you have committed a crime you should be punished, but there are different types of crimes like if you were caught with drugs or stealing then it would be less harsh charges. There are plenty of reasons people don’t want them charged because they think they are kids, not some who broke the law, but these are people who have killed someone. If they are doing adult type crimes they are as dangerous as an adult offender.
Heinous crimes are committed every day in the United States. Each year thousands of juveniles under the age of 18 are arrested. The debate of “should a juvenile be tried as an adult” is one for the ages. Many would like to argue against the idea as they believe firmly in rehabilitation. But what happens when the crimes are so violent that the family is unable to recognize the victim or when the juvenile shows no remorse and then goes on to harm others. At what age should one be held accountable for their actions? At what age is a person taught right from wrong? A juvenile is someone who in many states is eighteen and under, but here in the state of Texas a juvenile is considered 17 and under. The people who agree that juveniles should be sentenced or tried as adults are the families of the victims, and the majority who acknowledge an adolescent should know right from wrong. Juveniles who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults because they are old enough to know the difference between right and wrong.
Crime, it is committed at least every thirty-five minutes. The crimes that are committed are either robbery or murder. Most of the crimes that are committed now of days are by teens. Juvenile, a person who is under the age of 18 who gets into trouble with the law. It is often argued whether or not these teens should be tried as adults and sent to an adult prison. In my opinion, it is based on the crime that the teen commits to determine whether or not, they should be tried as adults. But, if I were to choose, they should NOT be tried as adults.
Juveniles deserve to be tried the same as adults when they commit certain crimes. The justice systems of America are becoming completely unjust and easy to break through. Juvenile courts haven’t always been known to the everyday person.
Their brains are not fully developed and they can either be held accountable for their crimes or not but either way, should not be treated as adults. Teenagers are at the age where they are experiencing new things about themselves but they still know the consequences of their actions. Teenagers know right from wrong. They may be not adults yet but are not children either where they do not know left from right, right from wrong. The legal system is the enforcer of the rules and to practice equality, there needs to be equal punishment for people who commit crimes. Teens who commit crimes deserve the punishments that come with it. In receiving these punishments, it can offset the development of teens who grow to commit worse crimes. Juveniles that grow into young adults and harm the innocent. This would be taking a step towards legal equality and this nation would be just a bit safer for
Heinous crimes are committed every day in the United States. Each year thousands of juveniles under the age of 18 are arrested. The debate of “should a juvenile be tried as an adult” is one of the ages. Many would like to argue against the idea as they believe firmly in rehabilitation. But what happens when the crimes are so violent the family is unable to recognize the victim, or when the juvenile shows no remorse and then goes on to harm others. At what age should one be held accountable for their actions? At what age is a person taught right from wrong? A juvenile is someone in many states age 18 and under, but here in the state of Texas a juvenile is consider 17 & under. The people who agree that juveniles should be sentenced or tried as adults are the families of the victims, and the majority who acknowledge an adolescent should know right from wrong. Juveniles who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults as they are old enough to know the difference between right and wrong.
High school students who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults. Students that commit atrocious crimes should take full responsibility for what they did. Teenagers that commit a crime should be tried as adults as long as it is a heinous crime. The juvenile system is not enough for a teenager that has committed a violent crime. Trying juveniles as adults has resulted in fewer crimes. Since the government has started being harsher on students that commit violent crimes, the juvenile crime rate has dropped considerably. Secondly, the juvenile crime center cannot offer help to those who commit violent crimes. If a student has a mental illness, they should be helped and a juvenile center cannot offer that. Lastly, if you are tried as an adult you have more constitutional protections. The juries could be more sympathetic to a minor in an adult court. Trying students as adults has resulted in fewer juvenile crimes, the juvenile crime center cannot help teenagers that have mental illnesses, and being tried as an adult gives you more constitutional rights, are some of the reasons why a high school student that has committed a violent crime should be tried as an adult.
“An estimated 250,000 youth are tried, sentenced, or incarcerated as adults every year across the United States.” Many of the crimes committed are nonviolent offences, but teens are still getting sentenced to prison regardless of their age or circumstances behind the incidents. Recently my friend Kyle Johnson received 12 years in prison after he completes military school in Texas; altogether having to serve 14 years in prison. His situation was not considered and now has will not be able to live a normal life. Although trying juveniles as adults brings justice to cases, really the punishments are too harsh and actually causes more harm than good to the delinquent, because the sentence to prison will put them at risk and diminish the minor's ability to succeed in the future.
"Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time." -- David Grusin and Morgan Ames
Over the years, ten percent of homicides have been committed by juveniles. If one commits an adult crime, such as murder, he or she should have to pay adult time by going to prison. Although several people prefer to send teenagers who commit violent crimes to a correctional facility, it is imperative that we protect our society by putting the teenagers who commit malicious crimes in prison to bring justice to the victim's family.
The jail cell door locks, and a fifteen-year-old sits alone in the cell after committing a crime he didn’t think would have a severe punishment because of his young age. As more and more criminal juvenile cases are clogging the system each year, there is one issue that people cannot agree on. The juvenile justice system was created in 1899 and now it needs to be updated and that one issue in the way is should juveniles be tried as adults? While each case of juvenile crime is different, juveniles should be tried as adults for three main reasons: juvenile punishments aren’t harsh enough for serious crimes, trying juveniles as adults is necessary to create a deterrence and an intent to kill and other serious offenses deserves an adult punishment.
Many people think different when it comes to treating teenagers once they commit a crime. Folks think that their brain is not fully developed, but they sure do know what they are doing. If teenagers have the capability to commit a crime, there must be something between that made them act the way they did. Many blame parents for their child’s actions because they think that the kids learn from parents. For example, bad behavior, drug abuse, rape, murder, etc., but teenagers should learn from their parents mistakes. Teenagers should not be charged differently, if they are in juvenile hall or jail because at the end they still committed a crime.