Should Pro Athletes Get Paid Essay

Money is limited. One can only buy what one has enough for. People must be efficient with their money. One must fill all of their needs. Similar to this situation, owners of professional sports teams can only buy players they have enough money for. Salary caps are placed on players based on skill level and value. This could be based off of various influences such as location, fan base, concessions sold, and much more. When some teams get more money than others, those teams get stacked with great players that lead the teams to victory. However, some complain that they don’t have a lot of money, and state that that is the reason they don’t have a good team. Therefore, the issue of salary caps, has two sides. Although salary caps could be abused

There are five major sports leagues in the United States; Major League Baseball, Major League Soccer, the National Basketball Association (which has what is known as a “soft salary cap), the National Football League, and the National Hockey League. Of these five, only baseball lacks what is known as a salary cap. A salary cap is the upper limit of the combined salaries for a team’s players. In the other four sports I mentioned, having to work within the boundaries of a salary cap is a balancing act, to gain an advantage at one position requires you to be at a disadvantage at another position. For example, to have a top tier quarterback in the NFL like Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers and the large salary they command, a team might lack the funds to sign a top tier linebacker or cornerback. With Major League Baseball lacking a salary cap, this balancing act vanishes and teams could sign anyone and everyone they wished. This causes a competitive imbalance that is hurting the sport. Too often we see the same teams making the playoffs and winning championships like the San

This would lead to high school athletes choosing to go to bigger, richer schools to get more money. If this happens, the competition gap between rich schools and smaller schools will increase. Athletes being paid would also turn college athletics into a business. For example, if there was an elite high school basketball player who was trying to decide on what college to commit to, he may choose whatever college offers the most money. The next year, he could transfer to another college who offers him even more money. This system would put more pressure on smaller schools to try to recruit elite athletes so they can compete with larger schools. If small schools cannot meet the cost of paying athletes, the schools might shut down which could deprive some non athletes of the opportunity to continue their education on the college

If this was to happen universities and all would go down hill just by paying the players and the negatives that comes with paying them. Also the best player in college would get paid the most just for the reason that the person is the best, but someone that is not as good as him should have a equal salary in college. Only in professionals should someone that is the best in the league should get paid the most, but not in college considering that college athletes are amateurs. Athletic scholarships are their compensation and a fair one instead of trying to get paid. College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans.

College athletes can be easily manipulated these days. Student athletes go long tedious days to stay academically eligible and also work to keep a high level of competitive play during their competitions. These athletes need to praised and rewarded for outstanding accomplishments they have achieved during their career. These athletes are not being rewarded but are also living on and off the campus without any money in their pockets. Since these athletes are living without an adequate supply of money, they are highly susceptible to grabbing money from booster clubs or any others who are very willing to help them in any way or form. The problem with this situation is that those athletes are going to get themselves and also their school’s athletic

There have been many debates about whether or not college athletes should or should not be compensated by their schools for their services. The way it should be is that they should not be compensated for their works for various reasons concerning the schools they play for. Coming from a college athlete, compensation for us will only bring trouble for the schools we play for. From many other athletes’ points of view, they want payment for their own benefits or needs, but they don't see how it will affect the schools they attend. Colleges should not be entitled to providing compensation for their student athletes because it will hurt the colleges financially.

Salaries in Baseball are skyrocketing every year. Why would a salary cap be needed? It would be needed to help keep ticket prices down, and help make for a more even level of competition for all of the teams. A salary cap is needed to keep baseball thriving in the future, to keep the game exciting and enjoyable to watch for every fan.

To the people that believe this, I must remind them of Major League Baseball and the situation that they faced just a few years back. First, players' salaries skyrocketed to obscene levels, alienating their average fan. Next, the players couldn't decide how to divide up their millions. Finally, they quit playing the game and their fans quit caring about Major League Baseball. Does any of this sound familiar? This is exactly what's happening in the NBA right now. If it happened to the American Pastime it can, and certainly will, happen to the NBA. Yet people, in spite of the lower ticket prices provided by a hard salary cap, aren't convinced that a hard salary cap is a good idea. They feel that players

The debate on if Major League Baseball should implement a salary cap is becoming a popular argument throughout the professional world of sports. I personally think that there should not be a salary cap for baseball. A salary cap is an agreement within a sports league that puts a controlled limit on the salary of each player. If the MLB had a salary cap, there would be no way for teams to be able to compete against each other. Throughout time, baseball has been viewed by society as America’s pastime. This is one of the strongest supporting claims on why Major league baseball should not implement a salary cap. There have been eight incidents when the MLB tried to enforce the salary cap causing multiple organizations to go on strike so the salary

Major League Baseball is the only major professional sport that does not have a salary cap (the maximum in total payroll that a team can pay its players). For example, the National Football League has a salary cap for 2004 of about $75 million and the National Basketball Association has a salary cap for 2004 of approximately $44 million. There are multiple reasons for a salary cap but two of the underlying reasons are parity (equality) and competitiveness. It is assumed that without a salary cap, large market teams such as New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago will be able to ‘buy up’ all the good players leaving the small market cities such as Minneapolis, Cincinnati, and Phoenix with the less-talented left-overs. Additionally, teams that win more games and make the playoffs and World Series receive extra revenue from TV, thereby creating even more of a discrepancy if large market teams have an advantage in winning more games and playing in the post-season.

Having salary caps does not mean that the athlete would be getting paid less. Athletes are being paid around 15 million dollars. If there salary would go down to 10 million, it would not be a big problem for the athlete. Being paid 5 million dollars less as a professional athlete, is not a big problem because then they have the opportunity to keep playing make more. It would be saving the team money if they had the salary cap. If the athlete is sponsored, he or she would receive free items from that company and would not need to pay for it. The N.B.A. wants to slash player incomes by at least $750 million annually which could trigger a lockout next summer. Athletes would still get paid at least millions of dollars to play a game they love. Even if the N.B.A wanted to slash player’s income, it should not matter to the athletes because they still get millions of dollars.

Let’s look at it this way, Professional athletes have worked their entire life for everything they now have. Salary caps are not a problem in sports, this has been a very heated debate throughout every year in sports. There 's new free agents every single year, with some of the potential who deserve more than 300 million dollars over the next 10 years. Then there’s some who don’t even come close to making 1 million on a one year deal. Many people sit here and could fire rapid shots on why salary caps should be established in sports. While others believe that this could stop some people of what they should be making. Thats besides the point, I 100% believe that salary caps should be abolished in pro sports. I have some great

Imagine playing a professional sport and earning millions for sitting on the sidelines. This is what a salary cap is for. Many athletes such as Brock Oswieler, making 72 million dollars in a four year span, or Alex Rodriguez, making 275 million dollars in a 10 year span, are getting paid way too much. Some players deserve high salaries, but salary caps should be used and decreased in professional sports because a lot of players are being paid monster salaries for sitting on the bench and not being there. The team can’t overspend. Finally, some players get paid tens of millions.

Playing professionally in sports is hugely competitive. And despite the fact that sport may only occur a few months out of the year, the players are still training and keeping their bodies in shape in order to play in the next upcoming season. They also have to travel and leave their families for long periods of time. There is also the fact that once their play time is finished, they find themselves “with no other marketable skills” after “relying on their athletic prowess” for so long. (76) I think athletes are paid so much money because of the demand and pressure that is put on them to be a professional player. They put their time and dedication into the sport because it is their job. They also much sacrifice time with their families in order to play along with the constant risk of injury. I support the use of salary caps for players because I think it’s a fairer way to approach sports. They give the small-market teams a fair chance as opposed to being left with lesser players, tumbling attendance, and economic risk. Therefore wealthier teams won’t be able to dominating with many more top players. It keeps a balance in competitiveness. And it keeps salaries from getting too out of

Some people think that the athletes should be paid based on an open market system, but that process wouldn’t work for every school. This would mean an individual player would be paid based on the revenue that comes in due to their talents, but may vary due to the different deals with the different schools. Yet, how will the value of an athlete be determined and what happens to an athlete that improves overtime after being hired? Or a player that gets a high pay and suddenly gets hurt? Also, not all colleges can afford to recruit the players they want. When a financial stability study was done in 2013 about Division I schools, only 23 out of 228 schools really had the money to pay a college athlete. Paying a college athlete wouldn’t be the smartest