Should The Death Penalty Remain Instated

After many years of having the death penalty In 1960 people began to suggest that they abolish the death penalty due to how cruel it was. Due to this suggestion the law on the death penalty changed in 1976, only those who were convicted of intentional homicide would be executed. Although they had changed the laws many states still disagreed with the death penalty. Those states that did not agree with the death penalty fought and had it taken out. Ever since that day the laws on the death penalty in the United States have not changed. Death penalty is a punishment of execution by someone who’s legally in charge of a capital crime. Crime rate is a count of crimes that have been done. Execute is to be murdered in a planned fashion. The death penalty should be abolished because it does not help to lower the murder or crime rate, many times innocent people are wrongly executed, and it adds cost to the government and tax

This argument, rooted in the assumption “that people are afraid of death and will do anything to avoid it”. Due in part to its reliance on conventional wisdom, both the argument and underlying assumption appear to carry with them significant weight as it relates to penal philosophy; however, as demonstrated by numerous studies related to crime and punishment, the validity of such arguments is rested on unstable grounds.

With all the jails in the United States being overcrowded with convicts with serious crimes, and doing life without parole. I start to wonder what the impact would be if the United States allowed the death penalty to be used in all fifty states?

Many criminals take the lives of or hurt many people around them. They are later released after doing time in prisons to go on the streets again where they will do the same things over again. "[W]e reserve the death penalty in the United States for the most heinous murders and the most brutal and conscienceless murderers. To sentence killers like those described above to less than death would fail to do justice because the penalty – presumably a long period in prison – would be grossly disproportionate to the heinousness of the crime. Prosecutors, jurors, and the loved ones of murder victims understand this essential point…” Death penalty does the justice right for seriously violent criminals instead of having them do time in prisons to be released.

Since 2000, there have been over 200 exonerations from death row. More than half of these exonerations are because of DNA evidence that is found which proves a defendant innocent. The reason for these exonerations is that people make mistakes, there is no way to be fully positive of somebody else’s guilt. In some cases, evidence found against a defendant could just come down to bad timing. People may agree or disagree with capital punishment because it can become a very controversial topic. The main argument against the death penalty is that it is no longer morally correct and goes against certain beliefs. The death penalty should remain illegal in Canada because it costs more for taxpayers than life without the possibility of parole, it

But nothing scares people more than the idea of death, thus with this criminals won’t be tempted to commit a serious crime without chance of paying the ultimate price for their actions. This helps protect people from murders because the crime rates will decrease. We can argue that fear is the strongest emotion we have, and if we use it by inflicting it into criminals, then our streets will be a safer place. This deference factor has been around for years, “Death Penalty Curriculum” states, “Then in 1973 Isaac Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing murder.”[5] These types of results suggest that this method of deference has been around for a while, so if we adopt this form of Capital Punishment we will decrease criminal activity by just inflicting this fear into criminals.

This is the intent of capital punishment. McCrae, Miller, Lawrence, Dillbeck and Kennedy were just of few examples of murderers that were released and able to kill again. (Lowe, 2011). Each perpetrator was arrested for murder, and then released on parole. If these men had been put on death row, they wouldn’t have had a chance to kill again. Supporters of the death penalty are in favor of making examples out of offenders (Capital Punishment, 2013). If people know that they can commit a crime (murder) and know they will only serve a short sentencing before getting out of jail again, then they won’t feel like they’re risking anything by doing it. On the other hand, if someone knows that they could be facing death when certain crimes are committed, they would be more likely to weigh their outcomes before doing so.

Capital Punishment would prevent convicted capital offenders from rejoining society. The possibility of a once convicted murderer being allowed to rejoin society can strike fear in the hearts of many especially the victim’s family. The punishment that was intended to be life in prison can often be reduced in many cases. In the United States the prisons are so overcrowded that lawmakers are releasing convicted criminals to make room for more criminals. Booming incarceration rates paired with reductions in prison spending force proceedings targeted at reducing crowding (Guetzkow & Schoon, 2015). A prisoner serving a life sentence for murder could be released by the way of good behavior or time served in order to free up space within the prison for more criminals. Many could argue over the possibility of prisoners

It is human nature to want to do what is against the rules set by a superior power, even Adam and Eve disobeyed God when He directly stated not to eat the apple from the specific tree. Some other valid arguments could be that sending these criminals away will cost too much money, seeing that life in prison and even the death penalty costs well over $1 million. Furthermore, it may encourage rapists to murder their victims afterwards and hide the body since at that point rape and first degree murder would have sentenced them to life in prison regardless. However, there is an absolute 100% way to prevent being charged for rape and murder: do not rape and do not murder-- simple as

Most criminals are sentenced to life in prison, which then prevents them of their freedom and from doing what they want to do. It is a punishment, and we do it, hoping that they will learn from it. To put it simply, we cannot restore a criminal to the normality of life by killing them

I also believe the capital punishment makes a fear factor, and makes some people think twice before they commit such crimes.

Capital Punishment should be taken as a serious issue because everyone makes mistakes but they have to be punished. I think everyone deserves a second chance, death penalty is just the easy way out.With death penalty you can make a lot of mistakes and it puts many lives at risk.Capital Punishment is the punishment of killing someone legally who has committed a serious crime such as a murder. This started back in 1608 in Virginia, it may seem like a great idea but were you aware that death penalty is available in 30 states? The killing of a wrongdoer is something that is permitted by the government and that is very wrong. In fact, The idea of killing someone of a crime is cruel, but others are for it I just think that death

My personal belief is that there is no need for capital punishment in our society. Advocates say that capital punishment is needed in order to deter future criminals, but this is not entirely the case. Research has shown that capital punishment, as a deterrent, has no positive or negative effect. An influential student of the deterrence question, Thorsten Sellin, conducted a study that

Capital punishment was established in this country many years ago to punish those members of society which have committed horrendous crimes against fellow citizens and in a way to give the family of the victims a sense of peace. Various forms of capital and corporal punishment exist around the world and in most cases are very closely related to the religion of the nation. I believe that capital punishment is an atrocious institution and should only be used in those very few cases where rehabilitation is not an option because it does not help the criminal become a member of society. It should be used only for those who kill just for the act of killing and for no other reason. The killer must be proved guilty beyond a

Capital punishment has been being practiced since about 1608, when William the Conqueror was in command. In the past, capital punishment was only used when a person had murdered another person. Today, capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics in the nation. People argue that it should be abolished because it is an inhumane way to die, although, it does not apply to everyone it 's extremely expensive to execute a person. If we abolish the death penalty psychologist wouldn 't have the opportunity to discover why they commit these crimes. On the other hand, people argue that it should still be practiced because it gives families closure when someone is murdered and they want to see the killer die so they know they wouldn 't be able to hurt anyone else. Capital punishment has many pros and cons to the practice, but in the end the cons outweigh the pros.