Civil Liberties: Should They Be Restricted During A Crisis? Government restrictions should be required during a crisis. One reason is that government restrictions gave the colonists multiple reasons to break away from Britain. The first point is that Britain enforced extremely high taxes on common goods, such as tea and sugar, which were staples to the colonists' diet. The colonists were upset about not being represented in Parliament, even though they were technically British citizens. They thought that since they were being taxed on goods, they should be represented in Parliament. Britain ignored their request, and this then ignited the colonists' inner fire to finally fight back. Secondly, Britain began to decline trial by jury to the colonists by using guilty by Parliament. (Head, T., 2015). Britain could declare anyone as guilty, thus subjecting them to the confiscation of their property, imprisonment, or even execution. (Head, T., 2015). Government restrictions are placed to keep public …show more content…
Government restrictions made the situation worse that what it already was. Hitler instituted government restrictions during his tyranny. (The Restrictions..., 2015). The first point is that the citizens of the nations that Hitler took over had no control or say over what Hitler did, so the people had to suffer under terrible conditions with the governmental restrictions. (The Restrictions..., 2015). Secondly, the Japanese that had immigrated to Canada from Japan to get away from the fighting from Second World War were stripped of all their rights. They were thought to be spies or insiders trying to plan a way to take over Canada because of the situation at hand. (The Restrictions..., 2015). The Japanese migrants, in the end, all happened to be innocent. (The Restrictions..., 2015). The Canadians should have done background checks before stripping the immigrants of their rights.
In 17th Century, British sent explorers to America and set up the first colony, Jamestown which is in America. Even a large number of people sacrificed in the New World, British still continued delivering more and more people to develop and organize the colony. After 1763, when British won the French-Indian war, British wanted to impose tax policies on colonies because British needed to fix their economy because of war. So British keep published new laws to forced colonists tax. All those laws and tyranny outraged colonists, so they decides to against Britain.
This means that the government was harshly restricting the colonies for the purpose of flaunting the power that it had. Most of these harsh actions were reactions to the colonists’ petitioning of the British government in order to resolve their grievances. For several years, a sort of back and forth action between the colonists petitioning and new restrictions being placed by the government took place. Eventually, the British government “crossed a line” of sorts and angered many colonists to the point that they were ready to bear arms against them. The Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking up Arms stated the American viewpoint that the British believed that parliament could “make laws to bind [the colonies] in all cases whatsoever” (Document 5). As these laws continued to cripple the colonies’ economy and restrict the colonists’ freedoms, they had no option other than to bear arms and fight their
The British North American colonies were extremely diverse. Different religions, ethnicities, and social classes were all represented in the colonies. However, with this diversity also came division; the only thing all these groups had in common was their membership in the British Empire and the rights that made that membership so appealing. Beginning with the Proclamation of 1763, which prohibited further settlement west of the Appalachian mountain range, the London government introduced policies, which the colonists felt violated their rights as Brits. Later acts continued this trend, especially the Coercive Acts, which managed to offend nearly every subset of the colonists because of its aggressive limiting of political freedom that the colonies had previously enjoyed. These prior freedoms included the electing of representative assemblies. In response, a massive boycott against British goods was enacted throughout the colonies in unified protest. This course of action was a repetition of what had happened in response to the Townshend Duties of 1767, which had been subsequently repealed. These events showed that the colonies had the ability to enact political change when they banded together in defense of what they regarded as their traditional British
When the colonists first arrived to the New World there were very few obligations and rules that the British government had set for them and they were on their own to live their life in the way they saw fit. Throughout the years, England realized how much of an asset the New World was to their economy. Due to the American colonies great advantages to their economy and their everyday lives, Great Britain became greedy and decided that only they should be able to exploit from the colonies. This greed prompted the Crown to implement new taxes and regulations in order to obtain a larger profit. After many attempts to work with Great Britain and being dismissed, the colonist declared independence from England. This caused the Revolutionary War and in 1783 the colonists were finally free from Great Britain. The colonists drew from the positive and negative experiences from the Crown's rule when writing their own country's government. The crown's supreme rule over all aspects of the colonists life compelled the colonists to incorporate a limited government into the Constitution. Because of the lack of representation that the colonists possessed during during colonial times, when making the constitution they secured the idea of popular sovereignty as an effort to make sure that all citizens could have an opinion in their ruling. Separation of power was implemented into the Constitution for the purpose of denying one person excessive power. Checks and balances fall under
Although he allowed the search, they were not authorized to open a locked cellar in which they forcefully entered. A protest formed outside his home due to the unlawful forced entry which represented a clear example of the colonists beliefs of their rights contrary to the beliefs Great Britain accumulates on imperial law. The colonists believed that british policies enforced in Writ of assistance were violating basic principles that outlined constitutional government. The very definition of constitutional government is a government with a constitution.
The colonists had a right to rebel against the British government because of the government's unfair treatment of the colonists. Before the Revolution, the colonists had to help Great Britain in the French and Indain War. After the war, the colonists were ended up paying taxes for stamps, paper, tea, and other goods that they exported because the British Parliment thought that the colonists should pay for the war. The colonists had no representation in the Parliment, so they thought that the taxes weren't fair. Another reason why I think that the Founding Fathers had a right to revolt against the British government is the quartering laws that the Parliment had passed. They weren't at war with anyone, so the colonists shouldn't
Colonists sought independence from British government for a multitude of reasons. Tension quickly rose between England and the thirteen colonies due to the unjust taxing without fair representation in Parliament, the colonist’s rights to assemble were taken away by the British, and there were many unreasonable Acts and laws put into place in attempt to have complete control over the colonists as well as intimidate them. For these reasons and the suffering that the colonists endured at the hands of the British government, I feel that the colonists had plenty just causes to separate themselves from England.
During the Great Depression, 10,000 immigrants were deported. In 1931, the government put a complete halt in immigration. The Canadian government also refused to let Jews into Canada. This was especially evident during May 1939. The SS St. Louis tried to land on the east coast of Canada. The ship was denied permission to dock. The St. Louis was carrying over 900 Jewish refugees. The ship was forced to return to Europe. Also, during the Cold War, many immigrants from communist countries were denied entry because the government was afraid the immigrants might promote communism in Canada and brainwash Canadians’ minds. During this period, the government took many actions to prevent the Japanese, Chinese, East Indians and others from entering Canada through a series of restrictions and acts.
Canada is presently known for welcoming many racial groups into the country. However, the Canadian government is not always giving out warm welcomes to different ethnicities. During World War Two, the country rejects many Japanese and Italians who are already Canadian. The treatment of the Japanese and Italians in the Second World War is very unjust. The two groups face being put into internment camps against their own will, the government separates families and force men to work on farms with little pay. The government of Canada also mistreat the Japanese and Italian Canadians because they are full of fear and superstition.
It was important for the colonists to leave the British rules, so they no longer have to follow the laws and the punishment of the British . Back when the king had control over America meanings he gets to decide what he can do, he had control of the judges. Control of the judges was critical as it dealt with assigning guilt and innocent in the courts. In addition, the king also had enough power to decide the punishment on the when he or she is guilty party. The British government holds the right to make the colonist to pay more taxes. If they don’t, they can punish them according to the law. Also, on document K the King of Britain, king George the III “has created his own set of laws and now feels that he has a right to force us to give food and shelter to British soldiers, stop us from trading with the rest of the world, and has set up too many taxes for us that we have no choice in paying. He also wants to punish people without a fair trial and jury.” King George had enough power to create all kinds of laws that made it unfair for the colonists to lead prosperous lives. Once the colonists were victorious in overthrowing British rule,
Imagine a country where the government could do anything they wanted because it was simply their “right.” The revolution was caused by a series of events which were started by the king passing taxes on the colonists and enforcing laws which were violating the civilians natural rights. There has been an argument since the war started about whether the colonists were justified in declaring independence and breaking away from their home country. The American colonists were justified in waging war for independence against Britain because the british government ignored countless formal petitions sent, the government didn’t have the right to impose taxes on the settlers, and Britain waged war against the colonists.
Throughout history it proved that Canadians were discriminating any non white people. Discrimination led to harm and violence to many groups of people. Any non-white person was treated primarily as a source of cheap labour. History shows that most immigrants took advantage of the jobs because they were willing to work twice as much as the white workers but the difference though was that they earn less money. One of Canada’s main victims were First Nations because their children were sent to residential schools, their lands were taken away as well as their resources.
The colonists desired to have their own nation, but the British government continued to place laws and rules over them so they would not lose rule over them.
Other countries such as the United States of America has welcomed refugees with open arms, with this they had an outbreak of refugee industries. They had employed 3000 workers, however, Canada was not welcoming to refugees especially the Jews, because they thought they had nothing to offer which was not true because many refugees brought work and new customers. In an editorial, The Globe and Mail, June 19, 1939, it states,
As a nation, Canada is known to the rest of the world for being thoughtful, polite, and generally very accepting of all ethnicities and people. However, the treatment of Canada’s Indigenous population, Japanese Canadians, African American and Indigenous slaves seems to suggest otherwise. Canada's dark past may not be talked about often, but there are three main events that targeted specific ethnic groups which still affect those people today. Residential Schools led to major negative cultural consequences, as well as psychological and sociological effects. Japanese-Canadian Internment Camps were used to strip Japanese Canadians of their rights because of the World War II bombing of Pearl Harbor. And finally, for two centuries slavery was legal in New France, and in Lower Canada under British rule. Human beings were being held captive and were owned by many people, including governors, bishops, military officers, priests, and blacksmiths. All of these terrible consequences can be accredited to Canada’s imperialistic policies.