Should They Be Restricted During Crisis Essay

British officials caused angry colonists. Laws like the Sugar Act, Stamp Act, and Tea Act made colonists stand up and resist. British believed the Parliament makes the decisions, but because of the location, difference rules were hard to inforce. The lust for power to control the colonies was very strong but they were not going to keep letting it happen.

In the Declaration of Independence, one of the reasons given for declaring independence from Britain is “For taking away our Charters: abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments: For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with the power to legislate us in all cases whatsoever”. The colonists had been accustomed to being loyal to Britain while still having their own rules and governments, so when Britain issued the Declaratory Act in 1766, which stated that Parliament had the ability to “bind the colonies in all cases whatsoever”, the colonists felt threatened. Governments determine the way of life of the people, so this grievance listed in the Declaration of Independence reminded the colonists that their laws, their forms of governments, and essentially the colonists’ abilities to choose how to run their colonies was taken from Parliament.

The colonists edged closer and closer to a turning point. Several colonists still insisted on finding a peaceful resolution and remaining under Great Britain’s control. The majority, however were dissatisfied with Britain’s abusive treatment of colonists. Colonists demanded the same rights that all British-born persons were entitled to by the common law of England. . Tensions between Parliament and the colonies reached a point of no return. Great Britain sought out to stop all rebellion attempts from the colonies by mobilizing its troops. In response, colonists formed militias to protect colonists’ rights. As independence and the forming of a new, separate nation were imminent, Great Britain performed its utmost to keep the colonies under control whereas colonists were prepared to do whatever it took, including violence, to get the freedom they so wanted. .

Imagine a country where the government could do anything they wanted because it was simply their “right.” The revolution was caused by a series of events which were started by the king passing taxes on the colonists and enforcing laws which were violating the civilians natural rights. There has been an argument since the war started about whether the colonists were justified in declaring independence and breaking away from their home country. The American colonists were justified in waging war for independence against Britain because the british government ignored countless formal petitions sent, the government didn’t have the right to impose taxes on the settlers, and Britain waged war against the colonists.

And in order to collect the taxes, the Bratians raisen the Sugar Act and Stamp Act to put more restrictions on colonial trade and forced colonists to buy special stamped paper. That makes conlonist getting angry and to against the "Taxation without representation", the only thing they want to do is to elect their own colonial legislatures. Also the Proclamation of 1763, bans them from crossing and going to the settlement of the west. So the colonial rebellion is reasonable, they just deserved to have much more control over their own government. For the resistance, colonies coordinate to boycott the British goods. And the matter was worsened when the British government enforced the Townshend Acts through force, it imposed taxes on imported goods from Britain, which really hurt many colonial merchants. And colonies respond that with more boycott. Although the Tea Party removed taxes on tea sold by British, but American tea still taxed. So on the December 16th, 1776 the Boston Tea Party dump 90,000 pounds of tea into the ocean to resist. But after that, British soldiers flooded into Boston, and colonists had to feed and lodge them. The Continental Congress was formed to reason the King George, in the attempt to keep the peace between Britaish and colonies, but he refused the negotiation, and sent troops to

Colonists sought independence from British government for a multitude of reasons. Tension quickly rose between England and the thirteen colonies due to the unjust taxing without fair representation in Parliament, the colonist’s rights to assemble were taken away by the British, and there were many unreasonable Acts and laws put into place in attempt to have complete control over the colonists as well as intimidate them. For these reasons and the suffering that the colonists endured at the hands of the British government, I feel that the colonists had plenty just causes to separate themselves from England.

To begin with, the British government abused its power. Parliament passed many laws and taxes which infuriated the colonists. They were imposed for power, regulation, and money. These new laws encroached the freedoms of the colonists. For example, the Sugar Act of 1764 increased the tax on sugar imported from the West Indies. The Quartering Act of 1765 required colonists to provide food and

It was important for the colonists to leave the British rules, so they no longer have to follow the laws and the punishment of the British . Back when the king had control over America meanings he gets to decide what he can do, he had control of the judges. Control of the judges was critical as it dealt with assigning guilt and innocent in the courts. In addition, the king also had enough power to decide the punishment on the when he or she is guilty party. The British government holds the right to make the colonist to pay more taxes. If they don’t, they can punish them according to the law. Also, on document K the King of Britain, king George the III “has created his own set of laws and now feels that he has a right to force us to give food and shelter to British soldiers, stop us from trading with the rest of the world, and has set up too many taxes for us that we have no choice in paying. He also wants to punish people without a fair trial and jury.” King George had enough power to create all kinds of laws that made it unfair for the colonists to lead prosperous lives. Once the colonists were victorious in overthrowing British rule,

When the colonists first arrived to the New World there were very few obligations and rules that the British government had set for them and they were on their own to live their life in the way they saw fit. Throughout the years, England realized how much of an asset the New World was to their economy. Due to the American colonies great advantages to their economy and their everyday lives, Great Britain became greedy and decided that only they should be able to exploit from the colonies. This greed prompted the Crown to implement new taxes and regulations in order to obtain a larger profit. After many attempts to work with Great Britain and being dismissed, the colonist declared independence from England. This caused the Revolutionary War and in 1783 the colonists were finally free from Great Britain. The colonists drew from the positive and negative experiences from the Crown's rule when writing their own country's government. The crown's supreme rule over all aspects of the colonists life compelled the colonists to incorporate a limited government into the Constitution. Because of the lack of representation that the colonists possessed during during colonial times, when making the constitution they secured the idea of popular sovereignty as an effort to make sure that all citizens could have an opinion in their ruling. Separation of power was implemented into the Constitution for the purpose of denying one person excessive power. Checks and balances fall under

The colonists were right to break away because the acts imposed by Britain were unfair. As stated in Document B of the DBQ, acts like The Townshend Act and The Stamp Act were unconstitutional and not reasonable. They were, “Destructive to these colonies”(Document B), and Britain used them to dump their duties upon the colonies. The were unfair because the colonists, who were already working for Britain, had to pay for the weighty debts of a war they never chose to begin. The Proclamation

Once again, the colonists were angry that they were being taxed on basic needs. This anger only grew through the Boston Massacre incident, where five colonists were killed, and the Boston Tea Party, where enraged colonists dumped tea into the Boston Harbor. The last straw for the colonists seemed to be the passing of the Coercive Acts, otherwise known as the Intolerable Acts. These acts were created to regulate and basically restrict the colonists to make them realize that Parliament was in control. Colonists did not agree with this act, specifically the Quartering Act which required them to house British soldiers, as well as feed and clothe them. These acts and taxations, along with the violent incidents that occurred in Boston, and a lack of colonial representation in the Parliament caused the colonists to

The Declaration of Independence protected the ideal that the government gets its power from the consent of the governed, which Britain took away in the Intolerable Acts. The Declaration of Independence states that “…governments are instituted among men, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed…” The government is receiving their power from the people, and should only be able to rule after they have received assent from the people. Those who are governed should have a say in who governs them; they are the ones who are allowing the government exercise power. In particular, one of the instances in which the British government took this freedom away from the colonies is the Intolerable Acts. As punishment for the Boston Tea Party,

During the Great Depression, 10,000 immigrants were deported. In 1931, the government put a complete halt in immigration. The Canadian government also refused to let Jews into Canada. This was especially evident during May 1939. The SS St. Louis tried to land on the east coast of Canada. The ship was denied permission to dock. The St. Louis was carrying over 900 Jewish refugees. The ship was forced to return to Europe. Also, during the Cold War, many immigrants from communist countries were denied entry because the government was afraid the immigrants might promote communism in Canada and brainwash Canadians’ minds. During this period, the government took many actions to prevent the Japanese, Chinese, East Indians and others from entering Canada through a series of restrictions and acts.

Immigration has grown to become a big aspect in today’s society in Canada. Most cities have welcomed immigration, although mainly portrayed in bigger cities. Immigration in Canada has come with its share of pros as well as its share of cons. The pros with the immigration in Canada starts off with the racial blending of persons in the community, giving future generations a more positive outlook towards equality for all races because they grow up in a world that, for them, hasn’t seen racial and cultural inequality. In my opinion, in a world where children aren’t aware of the cultural and racial inequalities that had been put forth in the generations before them is an enormous strength to immigration for the fact that every person has a right to life and liberty and to have those ideas implanted in the generations to come is detrimental to a working society. Cons found in immigration in Canada fall in employment. The more people immigrate to Canada, the more jobs are being filled leaving others without any. The Immigration Refugee Board is able to offer a wide

They treated their regulations very badly when they rebelled against the king. In fact the subjects opposed to the taxes oppressed on them even though it was rightfully laid upon. The colonists protested “No taxation without representation” but the British Parliament had all rights to tax because it was the sovereign of the British Government. At the same time the British Government taxed its citizens as well using their way to tax. There was no difference between the way they were taxed, and the rebels opposed to it thinking it was violating their rights. What rights state that even if the British taxed their own English subjects the rights of the colonists were violated? Plus it seems silly of an idea to allow a nation more than 3000 miles apart to have a say in government that may not only affect their nation. The colonists pleaded for a say in Government but it was ridiculed by the Parliament because the colonists didn’t realize the stature in England present at that time. Their main motive behind it was to get a say for their own nation which is not only what the Parliament