Single Sex Education Essay

Single sex schools also break down gender stereotypes (“Advantages”). In coed schools, typically boys tend to overshadow equally talented girls (Mullins). Boys tend act more assertively, aggressively, vying for the teacher’s attention in the classroom, whereas girls tend to participate less due to their subservient attitude in coeducation classrooms. (Hughes). The pressure of a male dominated class may pressure girls into giving up in class. In coed schools, both genders distract each other: The students worry more about how they look than their education (Hughes). In single sex schools, however, students focus more on school than on the opposite sex (Whelan). By separating the sexes, the temptation, embarrassment, and distraction go away. This allows both genders to explore nontraditional disciplines typically not seen in coed schools. Girls take more leadership roles in the classroom, and those who give up in coed classes participate more in single-sex classes (Schultz). Girls also pursue nontraditional disciplines in single sex schools (Mullins). Girls commonly

Did you know that single-sex classrooms are the worst classes ever? Over the past decade, single-gender classrooms have been opened in at least 230 schools in the rural, suburban, and the urban areas. Single-gender classrooms are classrooms where either young girls’ are in one class together, or young boys are in another class together. Single-sex classrooms were created because studies showed that boys and girls learn differently and they could benefit from being in a classroom with peers to whom they can relate. Since 2008, single-gender education has been the key to improved educational performance among boys and girls throughout the years. Today, gender differences among girls and boys are steadily rising in the classrooms they are in,

There are millions of schools throughout the world. America holds about 132, 656 schools alone. Majority of the schools in U.S. are coeducational. There are over 540 single-sex schools throughout the U.S. since 2010. However, new up to date studies have shown that separating males and females in school has lead to better overall test scores and career opportunities. Boys and girls should be taught in separate schools to improve educational performance. Coeducational schools do not have the time to focus in on areas that the students may struggle with. Single-sex education, along with scientific studies have found ways to assist in this issue. Unlike coeducational schools, students will have a better attention on the subject due to their

Many people might say the single sex schools are ineffective, because girls and boys need to know how to communicate with the opposite sex. They should be enforced to help children reach their full dreams without the thought of humility standing in their way. School is a place where students get acquainted with the basics of the life, which further helps them to foster their proficiency level in different aspects of life required in this competitive world, and the most important part of school is not where students get time to socialize with each other. Although Co-ed schools are a first choice for most adolescents and their parents, Single sex schools are equally good. In single sex schools, students don't have to worry about sexual

There is a long history of single-sex schooling, in which males and females attend specific classes or schools only with members of their same sex. This separation of genders may be done for educational purposes or in combination with other factors, such as social interactions that occur between male and female students. There is some support for the idea that single-sex schooling can be beneficial, especially for outcomes related to academic achievement and more positive academic aspirations (Lee, 2008). Although, there are many benefits of children attending single-sex schools, evidence shows that sex segregation can also gender stereotyping and legitimizes institutional sexism (Kennedy, 2000).

In today’s society, the implementation of same sex classrooms has been a major debate. From 2011-2012 there were 506 public schools in the United States that offered same sex classes. Today however there is only about 80 public schools with same sex learning environments. ("NASSPE: Home > Introduction"). It has been shown that same-sex education makes it harder for students to adjust in a co-Ed society, it negatively affects boys maturity and health, it can be expensive, and studies show no success. For these reasons same-sex classrooms should not be implemented in public schools.

Students in single gender schools break out of their gender roles. According to Jeanne Sather, Magnet Schools of America Conference, “supporters of same-sex education say it builds confidence and helps students concentrate on their work by removing the distractions of dating and other social pursuits.” The goal that teachers want students to reach is to endure as much learning as they can. Boys and girls become more open-minded when it comes to choosing subjects in single gender schools as if they were switching gender roles. Females refer more to masculine activities and males refer to feminine activities (Andre). Single gender schools teach students how to expand their subject choices. Effective teaching of children

Single-sex education has been growing in popularity since the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act was passed, allowing local educational agencies to use “Innovative Programs” funds to support same-gender schools and classrooms “consistent with existing law.” The U.S. Department of Education loosened its Title IX regulation in 2006 to diminish prohibitions on single-sex education. While simply separating boys and girls doesn’t guarantee success, schools that use best practices for gender-specific teaching may be more successful at teaching to boys’ and girls’ strengths. Many experts say much of the success of single-sex schools stems from a demanding curriculum and a focus on extracurricular activities. These things are gains that would have been seen regardless of whether the opposite sex was in attendance. Coeducation advocates and researchers also report that segregating students by gender can lead to greater gender discrimination and make it harder for students to deal with the other sex later in life. What the two sides can agree on, however, is that every child is unique and deserves an education that uses evidence-based teaching approaches to meet their particular needs.

Single-sex schooling has occurred throughout U.S history and is prevalent in countries such as Australia, Belgium, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and South Africa (Bigler & Signorella, 2011). Due to variations in cultural contexts and educational systems, interpreting data and comparing conclusions based on research can be extremely controversial. Therefore, the United States is apprehensive about single-sex education. Another focus is because of the constant change of politics and polices over many decades, which directly impact research, practice, and judgments (Bigler & Singorella, 2011).

Single sex schools would also increase the academic potential of students by eliminating the male dominated classroom and replacing it with a level playing field for males and females. Stated in the article “research

This paper is written to discuss if schools should move towards single-sex classrooms. There are many reasons to move towards having this type of learning environment be an option.

Just as there are arguments against single-sex schooling, there are also arguments for the use of these schools. One person who supports these schools is Hillary Clinton; an article by Nancy Autin states that “In 2001, in pursuit of gender equity, an amendment bill coauthored by Hillary Clinton allowed provisions for public schools and districts to offer the choice of single-sex schools or classrooms to its students” (1). This amendment was adamant on providing equal opportunities for boys and girls in these single-sex schools, while also using the results as research towards furthering the theory that boys and girls learn differently. As the issue over single-sex schools began to arise, people began to research to prove whether or not these schools are the most effective way of learning; furthermore, many arguments are now being made which support that single-sex schools are actually a more effective way of learning for students.

Single-sex and co educators have different views on single-sex education; however, both agree that students can distract and influence each other. One way students influence each other is by competing for the opposite sex’ attention. For instance, girls will compete against each other to win a boys’ attention and vice versa. “Snow and others point out that in a single-gender environment they don’t see the competition for attention or showing off that can occur in coed classrooms” (Frazer-Harrison, 2014, p. 2). Similarly, both boys and girls have crushes, which affects their schoolwork; they act differently and often lose sight of what is important, such as academics, in order to impress their crush. Undoubtedly, boys are affected by girls, while girls are affected by boys. “Research shows that male students in a coed setting are affected by “a politeness factor” in the presence of female peers, according to Dona Matthews, a Toronto-based developmental psychologist and former instructor at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education” (Kwong, 2013, p. 3). The presence of the opposite sex impacts how students focus in class, which can lead to a decline in academic achievements. Educators from both single-sex and coed agree that students focusing on academics can be affected by students of the opposite sex. Battle Creek has become one school that has embraced single-sex education. As a result of separating boys and girls, they act more mature and are not trying to catch a

“Boy free school zone.” “No makeup Monday- Friday, 8:00 am -3:25 pm.” Both of these are phrases on posters made by the students at the high school I attended. They seem rather petty until it is known that I attend Academy of the Holy Names, which is an all-girls’ high school. Before high school, I attended multiple co-ed schools so switching to single-sex education was rather different for me. Four years at Academy of the Holy Names prepared me to be successful in my future endeavors and also to be confident in who I am. Although research shows that single-sex education is beneficial for both sexes, it indicates that single-sex education is more advantageous for females than males. Research and statistics explain that there is a male dominance in co-education schools, and that single-sex education provides girls a better environment to learn and allows them to build confidence in their studies.

One of the most debated arguments in the area of education has been the fight to make more single–sex schools available for students. Co-ed schooling has been the standard for education that many children enjoy being in. Many argue however that changing schools to be single-sex is one of the best solutions to upgrade the education for children. However, a school that provides single-sex education is not automatically a better school than a coeducational one. Thus, when seeing the whole picture, single-sex education is the same, if not worse than co-education.