Single Sex Schools : An Old Time Idea

Imagine that you were in a classroom full of your gender how would you feel? Well, if you feel that you're not ok with that well, In school year 2004-05 122 public schools offered single sex classes and 34 public schools were single sex classes mandatory according to “Old Tactic Gets New Use: Public Schools Separate Boys and Girls.” Article. Close to 70% of kids in single sex classes raised their math and reading scores in “Old Tactic Gets New Use: Public Schools Separate Boys and Girls.” Article. Although this may seem bad and shouldn't happen it's really not. Kids in single sex classes will have more of a chance to succeed than students in non single sex class because of most kids have no problem with this in their school, less discipline, and most of all higher grades.

In the article Fight Proposed Ban on Single-sex Schools by Christina Hoff Sommers, the Irma Rangel Young Women’s Leadership School in Dallas, has garnered success as an all-girls school. The school has exceeded expectations by having students in grade 6-12, score exceptionally well compared to a majority of other public schools. Supporters of single sex schools feel that to enroll students into single sex education it’s by choice, not by force. They also feel that in a co-ed school setting gender stereotypes are intensified compare to same sex schools.

Did you know that single-sex classrooms are the worst classes ever? Over the past decade, single-gender classrooms have been opened in at least 230 schools in the rural, suburban, and the urban areas. Single-gender classrooms are classrooms where either young girls’ are in one class together, or young boys are in another class together. Single-sex classrooms were created because studies showed that boys and girls learn differently and they could benefit from being in a classroom with peers to whom they can relate. Since 2008, single-gender education has been the key to improved educational performance among boys and girls throughout the years. Today, gender differences among girls and boys are steadily rising in the classrooms they are in,

Some critics say that there is no clear research showing that single-sex schools improve students’ academic performance. Indeed, rigorous educational research has found that, contrary to popular belief, single-sex education does not produce better achievement outcomes. However, Single-sex education is taking public school students to a new level, providing them with a greater variety of academic opportunities. More

Despite what many think, same-gender schools are starting to show up in public school systems across America. (Guarisco) Some ill-informed members of society believe that same-sex education is the wrong choice for America’s youth. Guarisco states arguments include that segregation leads to more rigid and traditional gender roles. However, schools that have implemented same-gender classes have seen promising results in grades and more support for same-gender education. Also, if a child wishes to attend a single-sex school in America, it must be voluntary. (Guarisco) For American public school systems, same-gender education would be more advantageous because of the higher test scores, decrease in distractions from the opposite gender, and adapting curriculum.

Although single-sex education may seem to have many benefits for both genders, together and separately, there are relatively none that are proven. However, it is proven that each gender’s social skills will be severely underdeveloped from not having any interaction with one another. According to Seattlepi,”...When students are segregated by sex, they miss opportunities to work together and develop vital social skills” (Jen Saunders, The Disadvantages of Schools Segregated by Sex). This just proves how much students will be impacted by the segregation of genders in their schools and classes, and also according to Seattlepi,”Gender-segregated schools produce young men and women who don’t know how to communicate with one another and leave lasting impressions that one gender is better than another” (Jen Saunders, The

Juliet Williams, UCLA Department of Gender Studies professor, calls out LAUSD for nonresponsive action to results that suggest sex segregated schools not only don’t improve students performances, but also stunts certain necessary social and learning abilities, in the Los Angeles Times article “What's wrong with single-sex schools? A lot.” She begins exposing underlying sexist and racist motivations for sex-separated schools and proceeds to explain that the segregation supports generalization about differences between the sexes, which Williams suggests is common among school practices. Williams continues, admitting that the schools provide opportunities for smaller class sizes as well as allow for “strong mentoring relationships”, although she finds fault with the overall lack of evidence that single-sex education improve student’s performances. Ultimately, the author is exposing injustices in single-sex education in the hopes of not only motivating LAUSD, but also educate parents in the hopes of gathering a larger concerned

The current public education system claims to have the student’s best interest as a top priority, but in reality, it is actually harming the students. Almost all are short-changed the way education is set up now. Boys and girls learn in different ways. They are not different merely because of how they are treated in society, but because of how their brains function. However, when teachers try to teach different genders at the same time, the majority of the time, it just will not work. Badly needed are teachers that understand the differences between, and how to teach, boys and girls. Coed schools hurt more than they help, not allowing children to reach their potential. Single-sex schooling is more beneficial to the student’s learning.

Lastly, students who go to single-gender schools do not have any academic advantages over children who attend co-ed schools. In “Co-Ed Schools are Here to Stay” the text states,”After looking at 184 studies, the researchers failed to find significant advantages of single-gender schooling for either boys or girls.” This shows that students at co-ed schools do just as well academically as students at single-gender schools. Knowing this information, there is no reason to send your child to a single-gender school when there is no advantages in you child’s school life or life as an adult.

Schools are meant to provide students with a good education and to help them get prepared for the world but, Single gender classrooms are doing the opposite

There are millions of schools throughout the world. America holds about 132, 656 schools alone. Majority of the schools in U.S. are coeducational. There are over 540 single-sex schools throughout the U.S. since 2010. However, new up to date studies have shown that separating males and females in school has lead to better overall test scores and career opportunities. Boys and girls should be taught in separate schools to improve educational performance. Coeducational schools do not have the time to focus in on areas that the students may struggle with. Single-sex education, along with scientific studies have found ways to assist in this issue. Unlike coeducational schools, students will have a better attention on the subject due to their

Topic: Should we separate gender in the classroom? Exact Purpose: To persuade my audience that separating genders in the classroom. i. INTRODUCTION A. Attention Grabber: Did you know about the adverse effects, if you send your child at the same gender school?. Based on the research covered by the U.S. Department of Education States that long-term academic gains are not established to exist in same-sex schools and there is only limited evidence that benefits can be measured at all.

There is a vast region of differences set in how girls, and boys learn differently; with schools using this information they are able to empower and better educate their students. Peter Meyer makes this a key point to bring up in: “Kathy Piechura-Couture, a professor at the Institute for Educational Reform at Stetson University in Deland, Florida, has studied children at the Woodward elementary school in Deland, which has had separate classes for boys and girls for three years. She concluded that boys and girls are different enough that they demand, or should be offered, separate schools. "We looked at gain scores and concluded that there is a significant difference for boys when put in separate classes," says Piechura-Couture. Over the years, she explains, other researchers have discovered a significant number of differences between boys and girls that affect their learning abilities at any given

Boys and girls learn in two different ways. This reason is why having a single sex school is more rewarding than a co-ed school. According to Dr. Schlosser of Breckinridge County Middle School's (Kentucky) the difference between the way boys and girls learn are the type of weather boys and girls prefer.) Boys prefer to learn in a cool, dark room. When there are two different people wanting two different things its hard to please both sides. Boys also learn much slower than what girls learn, this could be a problem for girls in the same class as boys for girls would learn and to move on, but would have to cut back their learning to wait for the boys to learn the same material. Boys also are interested in different subjects than what girls like. Boys are most secretly interested in music, science, and math. According to GreatSchools.com says boys feel girls won’t like them when they know they are interested in other things such as music and math and not baseball, football, and soccer. Many boys won’t show interest in music in a co-ed school. When boys are placed in a single sex school they won’t have the feeling of impressing girls so more boys will show their interest in arts and music. Boys are much better with math and science than what girls are says NASSPE VIII. NASSPE Vlll is single-sex school out of Huston Texas. "The most profound difference between girls and boys is in any brain structure per se, but also in the sequence of

In single sex schools boys and girls excel in subjects they usually would not. Single sex schools help children do well in subjects they usually would not be good at or subjects they would not usually try. For example girls do better at maths and science in all-girl schools; boys do better in languages and the arts in all boy schools. My first example to backup my point is a study by Cambridge University in 2006 where their research showed “boys improved in english and foreign languages in single sex classes, and girls improved in maths and physics. This proves girls and boys do better in subjects they usually would not do because they are more comfortable in a single sex school rather than a co-educational school. A second piece of evidence to help argue my point is a United States study that found boys at single sex