For my observation I observed a group of teenage girls that came into my work (Starbucks) every day for a week. This group of girls seemed easy to observe because they go through a pattern of sitting in Starbucks on a daily basis, and it was the same group of girls every time. The way they interacted with each other was very energetic and enthusiastic. Their facial expressions and body language clearly showed that they were comfortable with each other and interacted similarly. I went in and sat in the cafe to observe them the days I wasn’t working, and interacted with them as a worker the days I did.
When other people approached the group it was typically another girl of their age from school, church, or a club/sports team. The girls interacted with the other people in a positive attitude, but when the person (or persons) left they talked negatively about them. None of the girls tried to change the outcome of the interaction into a positive one, but instead they conformed to the others and joined in to the negative views. However, when a worker came up and talked to them they were all-around positive after the conversation ended. They seemed very friendly both during and after speaking with the worker.
I believe that this change in responses between the people their age and the workers was caused because of the amount of time they spent with them and how well they knew them. The girls that came up to them were people that they interacted with every day and likely
I could not help but be surprised of what they talked about because I never actually expected their conversations to ever lead that way. One of the ones that is twelve started to say that when she was still in elementary school, she would end up going to the fifth floor bathroom with one of the boys and they would sit on the sink and then she would kiss them. The other little girls started to laugh and one of them said, “Ew you are so nasty. Why would you do that? I’m going to tell mami and papi.” She acted like she did not care and then continued to say that she went on to touch the little boy “down there” and that the little boy just started to laugh. She just said that she just wanted to try what her parents and everyone in school was always talking about. She said she wanted to feel happy and feel the same way that everyone kept on expressing that they
“What hurts the victim most is not the cruelty of the oppressor, but the silence of the bystander.” -Elie Wiesel
In social psychology, social influence is a process where someone’s beliefs, thoughts and behaviour change by being exposed to beliefs, thoughts and opinions of others. It manifests in several forms, such as obedience, compliance and conformity. All these types of social influence have been studied by numerous researchers who investigated the reasons why people conform to social norms and obey to authorities, such as Milgram’s classic studies on obedience. His experiments support the popular idea of ‘banality of evil’ –Hannah Arendt (1963)’s famous phrase referring to the capability to accomplish dreadful things out of banal reasons–, revealing that people conform submissively and thoughtlessly to the orders that authorities deliver, no
The actions/interactions/reactions of the characters in this small setting also point to a female- suppressed environment. The males have the gall to stare openly at the girls as they go about their errands, while the women are shocked and “their eyes snapped back” to their respective business. Some might argue that this is normal for men to stare while the same sex-oriented people quickly avert their gazes. However, this is also indicative of a patriarchy. The status of the characters also indicates that even the store, an insignificantly small thing, follows the status quo of society. The males are the only ones with jobs, while the females are commented to be “houseslaves.” The naming of the characters is also blatantly slanted against the females. Sammy gives the three girls names instead of taking the time to ask them if they even have
The girls would stay a fair distance, but keep their glances fixed on the table of boys, going out of their way to gain their attention by laughing too loudly at a joke that wasn’t funny, or busting a move to their favorite song blaring from their iphones. None of the girls however were bold enough to directly approach the boys off to the corner, they would make plenty of excuses to walk toward them, but they never made direct contact with them. Families were less inclined to approach this area, and began to disperse throughout other areas in the mall. I also noticed the presence of security guards hired to monitor the crowds that were present later in the evening.
Two girls caught my attention as they started talking. They looked about my age but were a couple inches taller. I could
The group seem to consist of 4 girls. The interdependence of the second group was okay, because two of the girls did have an effect on how the others operated and enjoyed their food. The psychological boundaries were the happiness displayed within the group. No matter how many times the focus slipped from the food the group was in a great mood and enjoy each other company. There weren’t many physical
In The Other Side, there are a couple of different tones. One tone is ambivalent. The reason one tone is ambivalent is because they are kids so they most likely have mixed feelings about segregation. They were raised racist, but do not truly want to be racist. Another tone is kind. Both girls are kind towards each other even though they are different races.
The Interaction that I focused my research on involved four of female employees. Ages 17 and 18, and 23, three go to school together, one is a manager and all are white. When subject 1, whose name is Autumn approached subjects two whose name is Sarah, She waved at her and then slouched over the counter and slapped her hand on the counter laughing. Sarah laughed in return and walked over to greet Autumn. They began talking; Autumn seemed to be waiting to clock in. During there discossun Autumn seemed to become upset and began wavering her
Furthermore, Deborah, suggest that nonverbal communication may have a powerful impact on participants who may be influenced by members in the group. Therefore, Deborah, suggest that the powerful connection between body gestures, accompanied with other nonverbal cues, may cause the environment to become uncomfortable. Deborah, believes, a person may be influenced by the tone, the appearance, and stance any group member, Therefore, it’s possible for people to be manipulated by any group
The receptionist, after a few children were dropped off during this period, ended up introducing us to each other. The problem with this was twofold, firstly, I am not to have any interactions with the person(s) I am o observe, and secondly, the girl visible became more shy knowing I would be basing my notes off her. Fearing the rest of the work would not be acceptable or truthful to a nineteen year old’s actions I asked to have a different room. The only other nineteen year old on hand at this time was in the middle childhood room, to which I was escorted back to. The volunteer, another girl, was scheduled to come in at 8:00, by this point it was 8:07, so she was running late, but they assured me she was very reliable and would be here. After being taken to the room I was introduced to the daycare lady already in the room, seeing as how she was not in the age group I needed for observation I felt no problem with this interaction as it pertains to the observational hours. So, after the brief hello, I found a spot in the room where I would be able to observe. Seeing as how I had been in this room before I knew that the kids would be engaged in actives, so I found a seat in the room where I would be able to see everything. Around 8:10 the volunteer showed up. The first thing I noted was how she acted towards the younger kids, there were four kids in the room
According to Lockwood (2006), Anterior insula (AI) and Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC) are the neurones have been found to influence the affection and motivation of individual when experiencing the pain. The similar responses to neurones in the brain activity can be found both victim and observer. This is because the neurones involve a wide range of cognitive and social-emotional functions play a role in empathic processing. This can be explained in our result; the observers have experienced the affection changes such as emotional and biological changes because the observers saw the actor experiences painful experience with unconscious and automatic experience. This can
The bystander effect is both a social and psychological phenomenon in which an individual’s inclination towards showing helping behaviours are minimised by the influence of other people. Research has found that the more people acting as bystanders in a situation, the less likely it is that helping behaviours will be demonstrated. However in the correct conditions, where conditioned cues increase self-awareness, it is possible to reverse the bystander effect phenomenon. The bystander effect is prevalent in everyday life, and often decorates the news, shocking the world, especially when authority figures such as police men and women succumb to the effect. Diffusion of responsibility, ignorance of others interpretation of an event and self-consciousness are all social processes which appear to lead to social inhibition of helping behaviours and one of the main theories of the bystander effect is provided Latané and Darley (1970) whose cognitive model provides a series of decisions that can lead to social inhibition. The bystander effect is influenced by the conditions an individual is in when an event occurs, for example the bystander effect appears to be most dominant when an individual is in a group of strangers with low group cohesiveness. FINISH
Informational Influence and Normative Influence are both categorized under conformity in sociology. Informational is basically when we conform to others behavior because we believe it provides information about reality. It is often when we care about getting the right answer and trying to be rational. It also deals with the "Maybe they know something I don't know" phenomenon. An example, could be choosing to eat at a busier restaurant opposed to the empty one, or imitating the locals when outside your country. In contrast, Normative Influence is when we conform to others behavior because they expect us to. This is when we believe conforming may have positive consequences, such as approval or the enhancement of our reputation, or when we believe not conforming may have negative consequences, such as disapproval or punishment. An example of Normative Influence is laughing at a joke you don't get, or agreeing with an opinion you believe in others.
“Social influence is the process by which the actions of an individual or group affect the behavior of others” (Feldman 495). These influences are strongly experienced by members in the group. Every group is unique and is mostly guided by a particular norm and behavior. An individual in a group passively or actively allows himself to be influenced by the group just to have a sense of belongingness. In the bid to prevent being excluded or rejected from a group, some individuals overtly adhere to the norms of the group. “Thus, people conform to meet the expectations of the group” (Feldman 495).