preview

Social Cognitive Theory Paper

Decent Essays

While many areas of research have theoretical backgrounds founded in behavioral, biological, and developmental psychology, a leading theory has not been identified in the area of QOL (Graves, 2003). With that being said, social cognitive theory by Bandura has impacted the area of QOL, by influencing other theories such as Lent’s cognitive theory of well-being, and Tinto’s theory of retention. While there is not a exclusive theory linked to QOL, aspects of social cognitive theory by Bandura can be seen in the area of QOL.
Social Cognitive Theory In regards to Social cognitive theory (SCT), SCT is used extensively to predict behavior. SCT categorizes expectations into self-efficacy and outcome expectations, and past studies have shown how self-efficacy …show more content…

As stated, SCT is comprised of self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-regulation, and can be labeled as multidimensional and subjective (Graves, 2003). Graves (2003), conducted a meta-analysis, which studied SCT components and whether the components had a positive influence on cancer patients QOL. Key terms used to gather studies included: intervention, quality of life, cancer, treatment, psychological, and psychosocial. Data analysis included a correction formula, effect size, chi-square, and a focused comparison, which was used to predict whether SCT interventions influenced effect size. Thirty-eight studies were used in the study, and inter rater reliability was conducted and was acceptable (.694). Further, there was adequate power to identify differences. Overall, the analyses showed that QOL was improved when SCT components were used in an intervention or treatment. Furthermore, SCT components were found to have stouter effects on global QOL, physical (objective), social, depression, and certain QOL outcomes, however SCT components were not interconnected with coping, anxiety, subjective and overall physical domain, and functional outcomes. In regards to limitations, difficulties arose when making comparisons due to the lack of a well-defined theoretical framework. Additionally, poor external validity was noted, and studies included for analysis …show more content…

Lent suggested that there are basic connecting paths in relation to normative well-being. Overall life satisfaction is said to be manipulated by personality traits (e.g. optimism, neuroticism), as well as pursuing goals and making progress in certain life domains (i.e. domain-specific satisfaction), and the domain-specific satisfaction is affected by personality variables, goal progress, outcome opportunities, self-efficacy, and observed environmental resources and support systems, which is in line with the social cognitive theory by Bandura. Essentially, when an individual feels that progress is being made toward their goals, feels knowledgeable, and feels their environment is supportive of their goals, the person is more likely to be satisfied with their life (Lent, 2004). As reported earlier, Lent’s well-being theory was adapted from the social cognitive theory developed by Bandura (Lent, 2004). Within Lent’s integrated model of social well-being, comprehensive life satisfaction and domain specific variables are related, and the influence of the variables influence personality (e.g. extroversion), and variables related to social cognition. Lent and colleagues tested the integrated model of well being, by examining how well the model predicts global life satisfaction and satisfaction in two areas (e.g.

Get Access