preview

Summary: The Gay Rights Movement

Better Essays

The easiest way to summarize a social movement is with dates. 1776 and its attendant documents were the beginning of democracy in the Western world; in 1863, Lincoln freed the slaves with the Emancipation Proclamation; in 1969, the Stonewall riots marked the liberation of the gays. Obviously, history is infinitely more complicated than a list of dates; the gay rights movement in particular is proof of this. The underground nature of U.S. gay communities has ensured that records of important events in the “gay canon” are relatively sparse, and so the evolution of gay subculture is difficult to map--until an event comes along that pushes the homosexual into the spotlight. Arguably, the biggest of these events was the AIDS crisis of the 1980’s; …show more content…

As the years went on, in the eyes of the media, and thus the eyes of the public, the homosexual changed from what was fundamentally a homosexual--something other--into what was first and foremost a person, and only secondarily something abnormal. “Nothing short of death,” Virginia M. Apuzzo said, “has been the price that we’ve paid for growth, and that is an expensive price to pay”--but it was paid, and the gay community …show more content…

Concurrent with the foundation of the Mattachine Society (the second gay rights-focused organization in the U.S.) and the publication of Alfred Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Human Male was the beginning of government investigations into persons considered potential security risks, including Communists and homosexuals. It is telling that homosexual employees were considered a risk due to the fact that they were, according to McCarthy, “subject to blackmail,” (over, of course, their sexual orientation and activities.) Guy George Gabrielson, the Republican National Chairman, is quoted in the New York Times as decrying “sexual perverts who have infiltrated our Government in recent years” as “perhaps as dangerous as the actual Communists.” A report submitted to the Senate Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Department asserts that “homosexuals and other sex perverts are not proper persons to be employed in Government for two reasons; first, they are generally unsuitable, and second, they constitute security risks.” Newspaper articles and books that discuss the investigations take much the same attitude; rarely except in gay-specific publications is terminology or tone favorable, even when an author dismisses the idea of homosexuals as

Get Access