The Saga of The Sioux Conflict and Theme Analysis
After I read the book, The Saga of The Sioux, I concluded that there are two main conflicts; Man Vs. Man and Man Vs. Society. I also concluded that the Theme of the story is to treat others with equality. The first main conflict is Man Vs. Man. This is one of the conflicts because Little Big Man betrayed Crazy Horse by arresting him and having another guard kill him. This is also one of the main conflicts because near the beginning(when Little Crow was still alive) Wabasha betrayed Little Crow by giving the prisoners they had to the Bluecoats. This is also one of the main conflicts because at the end of the story, Sitting Bull was betrayed by his tribe and killed by Red Tomahawk. The second main conflict in The Saga of The Sioux is Man Vs. Society. I think this is one of the main conflicts because throughout the story, the Bluecoats treated the Native Americans like they were outcasts and didn’t want them on their land. I
…show more content…
I think this is the theme because the Bluecoats and the Government didn’t care about them and when the Indians were appointed to court near the beginning of the story, they didn’t even bother to appoint a lawyer to them, because they had such low respect for them. I also think this is the theme because throughout the story, the Bluecoats and the Government would lie to the Native Americans constantly. For example, they said that the Indians would stay on one reservation and stay there. Later, the Government sends out Bluecoats to relocate them after they have already settled on that reservation. I also think that this is the theme of the story because of the little acceptance that the Bluecoats and the Government have shown the Indians throughout the story. They feel as if the Indians are worthless and even try to change them by trying to make them convert to Christianity and to do other things than to have them be
During the story, the first conflict is between the two panthers and the child. In summary, the two panthers were going to hunt for food for their cubs when all of a sudden they heard a distant cry (page 83). The panthers changed their path with intentions of killing the child and bringing it back for the cubs. As a result, the audience feel bad for the child because if the panthers get to it, they will win with no doubt about it. The second conflict is between the settler that has a gun and the two panthers. To begin, the settler is walking back from work when suddenly he hears a child crying. He tries to contemplate whether or not to turn around and go check if everything is okay. He finally turns around and discovers that the child was crying because the panthers were face-to-face with the child. Therefore, the settler shot the panthers to save the child. Because of this, the readers feel bad for the panthers and the cubs since the cubs will obviously die from starvation without their parents. Thus, the diverse one-sided conflicts bring out sympathy towards the
In a story the conflict moves the plot making it one of the most important features. There are four types of conflict, man vs. man, man vs. nature, man vs. society, and man vs. himself. In the short story “The Necklace” the conflict would be described as man vs. himself, or man vs. society.
The Indians were being taken over by the white men and didn’t want to give up all they had so just like today we fight about it. There were a lot of religious beliefs tossed around. “Quite simply, the notion white the ways of white Christians may be fine for them; they are not necessarily equally for non-white indigenous peoples who have their own religious beliefs”.
The concept of “politics” is often described casually in political science as decisions people make in order to best decide how to live with other people. This definition of politics allows for the argument that anything can be deemed political, including the clothes we wear and the language we speak. Politics is not just regarded as the study of how government works through direct participation in elections, political parties, and official government policies under this definition, but it also includes how a common nationality is forged through cultural practices and interactions with “outside” groups. Jeffrey Ostler in his book The Plains Sioux and U.S. Colonialism uses the more inclusive definition of politics to illustrate how the Sioux
The Sioux people have been living in the Black Hills for over a thousand years they have been living peacefully until there was gold founded in the black hills causing the Sioux to lose their home and put on a reservation where they still face problems. Today they face the same problems with poverty, police brutality, and theft of their land to make it worse the Government is putting a dangerous oil pipeline that can destroy the reservation.
The conflict that Chief has with himself is a very intense one. Unlike the other two this one is emphasized from the begin of the book and is only resolved at the very end of the novel. The cause of his internal conflict begins when he is a little boy on his Indian territory. The white man comes on his father 's land and insult the Indians right in front of Chief.
The theme is Identity since Jason, Piper, and Leo discover who they really are, their parents, etc. Conflict developed that theme by continuously introducing Greek/Roman mythology to the trio, which started to trigger the introduction of their true identity. Even afterwards, conflicts like Piper versus Drew caused Piper to really wonder if Aphrodite was really like her siblings. The following discusses the effect conflict has on characters involved, and not
The Sioux tribe went through a lot of heartache and they went through a lot of struggles. The tribe always stick together and help each other out. Today there are still Sioux indians. Most Sioux indians are living in South Dakota, although they still live in other states as well. The Sioux tribe was most interesting to me because they went through a lot and they never gave
The plot of the story is very intricate and has multiple smaller climaxes besides the main climax.The characters’ decisions and actions are highly affected by the setting in terms of time period and place. The story takes place in the New York area, specifically in the forest and rivers where native tribes reside. The Native American tribes affect the decisions and actions of the characters because the Natives are a threat and are always near or trailing the protagonist’s group forcing the characters to make cautious decisions and actions such as, not using horses. The terrain of forest and rivers affects the story because the forest makes the movement limited to some that are unfamiliar and it provides a cover for the characters and their
“It has been our wish to live here in our country peaceably, and do such things as may be for the welfare and good of our people, but the Great Father [President] has filled it with soldiers who think only of death,” said Spotted Tail of the Brulé Sioux. This leader of the Sioux was appalled at what the white settlers and soldiers had done to their way of life. Over the course of Sioux history since America was formed, they have been nothing more than an inferior race being treated unlike humans. In Saga of the Sioux, the author talks about the struggles of the Sioux tribe had faced due to the American westward expansion. It also talks of how still today the Sioux have not given up on claiming their land and rights.
At least 60 percent of homes on the Reservation need to be demolished and replaced due to infestation of potentially fatal black mold, however, there are no insurance or government programs to assist families in replacing their homes. In the novel, Saga of the Sioux, Dwight Jon Zimmerman, the author, draws the attention to many of the occurring conflicts the Natives have been faced with as well as presenting the themes, elaborating on the reality the Sioux Tribe has dealt and dealing with due to the westward expansion.
The novel ,saga of the sioux, is non fiction, and written in third person. The author also talks about the way the bluecoats, government, and settlers/miners treated the Native Americans. Saga the Sioux was written in third person by the author, dwight jon zimmerman.“But because of the 10 years of broken promises, he understood why they wanted to fight.” a way you can tell this is third person is, the author uses pronouns like he, she, it, or they. The book, Saga the Sioux, is nonfiction, “in 1898 Frank A. Rineheart photograph of an arapaho Indian” this shows that the book had dates and facts. The author wants to inform us about how the bluecoats treated the Native Americans “... at the sound of the gunshot, the soldiers began firing their