preview

Sutton Hoo Vs Beowulf Analysis

Decent Essays

When the Sutton Hoo burial site was discovered in the summer of 1939, the quality and quantity of the burial surpassed any site previously discovered and therefore drew much attention in the archeological community. The richness of the artifacts led some to believe that it was the burial site or someone high and wealthy like a king. Around the same time more translations of Beowulf were being published and the epic poem was one of the few written records of the old English times, so naturally people tied this ancient site, dated to a similar period, to the literary text. The connection between the two persists even with the lack of evidence and the ambiguity around the facts of both the text and the site. Though using the archeological discoveries …show more content…

In a time that archeologists of today know very little about and have very little evidence for, assumption tend to be made and believed as fact. There is so much mystery surrounding both Sutton Hoo and Beowulf that the two have been naturally connected in the minds of many and have been affecting each other since the Sutton Hoo find. One scholar wrote about this human tendency saying, “Human beings understand the world by making analogies, placing the unknown alongside the known and extrapolating from the familiar to the unfamiliar; seldom do we encounter any ‘original’ thing that we can appreciate fully in its newness and self-sufficiency. Everything reminds us of something else, everything relates to some other thing” (Liuzza 281). This is true, especially with matters of ancient history, when often time, little to no evidence can actually tell archeaologists anything substantial about the life and culture of the time. People have often done this with Beowulf and Sutton Hoo, making strong connections with flimsy facts and similarities. The traditional pagan ritual of the ship burial in which people were sent to the afterworld …show more content…

One way that Sutton Hoo improved people’s understanding is that it validated some of the cultural descriptions and practices found within Beowulf. Before the discovery of Sutton Hoo people often wrote the poem off as a fanciful tale however “the rich gold treasure from Sutton Hoo brought the immediate recognition that descriptions of lavish burials and gold-adorned armour in Beowulf could no longer be dismissed as poetic exaggeration or folk memories of an age of gold before the Anglo-Saxons came to England” (Cramp 57). Because of the finding of the cenotaph people began to reguard Beowulf as a historical reference. However, some negative effects also stem from the assumed connection between the two. With the discovery of the artifacts people began to translate the poem into modern lanuages differently, adding more descriptions of precious metals and wealth that the text does not directly suggest. For example, “In a passage describing burial treasure from far-off lands, the translator’s words ‘bright gold and silver’ fit Sutton Hoo...but it is alien to Beowulf” (Frank 55). This is where the historical evidence of both the text and the site can limit or change the understanding of the time period in untrue or unprovable

Get Access