preview

Synaethesia

Satisfactory Essays

1. The authors decided to do a replication of a study performed by of Ramachandran & Hubbard (2001) and Hubbard (2005). From this study researchers looked at individuals who had synaesthetes and how they interpreted shapes, numbers and colors. Results from their study showed that individuals who had synaesthetes performed better by interpreting certain pictures by using more of the ‘pop-out’ effect rather than using the serial search effect. It also “assumed that color and shapes are processed independently, which does not hold true for people who have synathecia, giving that some amount of grapheme processing must be required for the color to be included”(Ramachandran & Hubbard 2001b, 2003b). Due to these findings researchers decided to “correct” …show more content…

Participants consisted of two different groups, the experiment, and control. The experiment group had 36 grapheme-color synesthetes, who all passed a measuring test comprised of color associations. While the control group had 36 participants who reported not to have synaethesia 3. I believe the embedded shapes tests where a group of shapes, numbers or letters formed or paired closed together to create a certain illusion. However for this study I believe the participants had to find the certain shape, and see if colors portrayed their vision to make them see it better. 4. Overall results showed that individuals with synesthetic, significantly outperform the control group. Stating that people with synesthetic do have a general advantage over self-report on controls. Researchers also founded that Synaesthetes are better at finding an “embedded shape comprising target graphemes among distractor graphemes. Additionally we also see Synaesthetes who do report color, typically experience around one third of the graphemes in the display as colored, assuming with the theory of spatial attention needs to be deployed to graphemes for conscious color experiences to emerge than the interpretation based on ‘pop-out’.( J. Ward et al.

Get Access