The cation exchange gel samples are labelled IEX 19-22 as these were the tubes with the highest activity as shown in the above table. The other IEX fractions had significantly lower specific activities so were less likely to contain the protein of interest and more likely to contain unwanted proteins than the higher specific activity fractions. Only the higher specific activity fractions were chosen for this reason. All the fractions that were analysed by gel electrophoresis have the same banding patterns which means that they can be combined to get a combined total for the yield calculations. This has then been used to calculate the amount that there would have been if the entire solution was used for this process. However, the …show more content…
This is seen in the gel electrophoresis where there is a greater number of bands for dye 9-11 than there is for the IEX tubes. The fold purification was expected to be between 3-7-fold as found on the “BRENDA web page” (2017), for this experiment a 1.4-fold (492404/349710) increase in activity was seen after dye ligand chromatography. The retrospective yield was like cation exchange which also gave an impossible result considering the after-dialysis yield. It is difficult to say which yield is more accurate. The after-dialysis yield measured may be lower than its true value or the error created by averaging the different tubes and treating them as if the entire sample has overestimated the amount of LDH present. Although there are more bands on the gel there is a lower retrospective total protein for dye ligand than there is for cation exchange 43.2 mg and 55.9 mg respectively. This could indicate that although there is a greater number of bands the ratio of LDH to unwanted proteins may be higher. This technique has gotten rid of the band that was present in cation exchange but has different bands present which shows that the two purification techniques are targeting LDH in different ways.
Affinity chromatography relies on the protein ability to bind to specific molecules tightly but not covalently. This technique uses a ligand bound to the matrix that is capable of specifically binding to the protein. When the impure solution is passed through the
In the experiment we used Turnip, Hydrogen Peroxide, Distilled Water, and Guaiacol as my substances. On the first activity, Effect of Enzyme concentration of Reaction Rate for low enzyme concentration, we tested three concentrations of the turnip extract, and hydrogen peroxide. For the Turnip Extract I used 0.5 ml, 1.0 ml, and 2.0 ml. For hydrogen peroxide we used 0.1 ml, 0.2 ml, and 0.4 ml. We used a control to see the standard, and used a control for each enzyme concentration used. The control contains turnip extract and the color reagent, Guaiacol. We prepared my substrate tubes separately from the enzyme tubes. My substrate tube
This Lab Report is an analysis of the results of a two-part experiment. In the first part, we used a gel filtration column to separate the components of a mixture composed of protein and non-protein molecules. By doing so we hoped to obtain fractions that contained single components of the mixture, while also gaining insight into the relative molecular weight of each component compared to each other. We would then plot these fractions onto nitrocellulose paper in order to determine which fractions had protein. In the second part, we would use the fractions which we had determined had protein to conduct an SDS-PAGE. By doing so we hoped to determine an estimate on the molecular weight of the proteins present in each fraction by comparing it to a tracker dye composed of a variety of molecules of differing molecular weight.
Protein Assay: The Pierce BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Scientific) is a detergent-compatible formulation based on bicinchoninic acid (BCA) for the colorimetric detection and quantitation of total protein concentration. A series of standard solution of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) ranging from 0-2000 µg/ml was prepared from a stock solution of 2 mg/ml BSA. 25ul of diluted crude (1:500, 1:250), desalted (1:100, 1:50), and 6 peak fractions from cibarcon blue column (1:10, 1:5) were loaded in microplate along with 175ul of BCA working reagent. Microplate was incubated for 30min at 370C and then the absorbance was measured at 562nm.
Colorimetric assay is a process of determining a concentration of a solution based on absorbance of light. The purpose of this lab is to determine if the Bradford assay is an accurate way to determine an unknown concentration of two samples of protein. The Bradford assay is done by measuring wavelength of light passing through a cuvette filled with Bradford dye and concentrations of PBS and proteins. After the cuvettes are mixed they are placed into a spectrophotometer to measure wavelength. The wavelength given will be used to plot a standard curve based on concentration (x-axis) and wavelength (y-axis). The standard curve is then used to measure an educated guess on the concentrations of unknown protein concentrations. We hypothesized that if we use the Bradford assay and colorimetric spectrophotometry we can determine an accurate concentration of two unknown concentrations of proteins. The results of this lab failed to reject our hypothesis based on accurate measurements of protein concentrations. The standard curves are drawn with a linear increasing slope. The Bradford assay is an accurate way to demine the concentration of an unknown concentration.
This technique separates Rubisco samples based on their size. The electrophoresis has a positive and a negative end. Positive charge proteins are loaded from the positive end and migrate towards the negative end. Negative charge proteins are loaded from the negative end and migrate towards the positive end (Sakthivel & Palani, 2016). The sample that contained the highest molecular weight of Rubisco will travel the shortest distance on the gel while the protein with the smallest molecular weight will travel the longest distance (Sakthivel & Palani, 2016). The size proportion of each Rubisco molecule correlates with the distance traveled. Rubisco will be in its purest form after running through SDS-page since each technique will increase the purity of the protein. If the salting out, the ion exchange and the SDS-page protein isolation techniques are performed on protein Rubisco, then it is purified and separated by solubility, charge, and size. The rationale of this experiment is to isolate the purest form of Rubisco so that it can perform carbon fixation at an optimal
Figure 1 contains gel electrophoresis for protein samples. The lanes were labeled from 1 to 10 from the right to the left. Lane 1 contained the ladder fragment. Lane 2 contained the filtrate. Lane 3 contained the S1 sample. Lane 4 contained the P1 sample. Lane 5 contained the P1 medium salt sample. Lane 6 contained the P1 high salt sample. Lane 7 contained the S2 sample. Lane 8 contained the P2 sample. Lane 9 contained the P2 medium salt sample. Lane 10 contained the P2 high salt sample.
Gel electrophoresis method. Qualitative analysis shows protein concentrations in kidney, heart, and liver. 1-6 are kidney tissue. 7-14 are liver and 15-19 are the heart tissue.
In Figure 3, there is a collected data with the total washes and the elution fraction with the RFUs from the Ni+2 Agarose column. E3 had the highest elution fraction with 8554 RFUs. In the Bradford assay, E3 had the highest protein amount with 65.5ug. The specific activity for E3 was about 1.28E5 RFUs/mg. Overall, in the Figure 3, the E1-E6 had most of the rGFPs due to being bonded in Ni+2. W1-W6 rGFP is much smaller than the E1-E6 amounts.
The proteins are also added to a Laemmli sample buffer in order to give each protein a negative charge so it is able to get pulled through the polyacrylamide gel. The next step is to put the gel into the electrophoresis module and to run it. It is run until the proteins have almost reached the bottom of the gel. A blue tracking dye is added to the Laemmli sample buffer in order to track the distance in which the proteins travel through the gel. If it is run for too long, the proteins will run off the bottom of the gel and it will mess up your results. Once the protein reach the bottom of the gel, the gel is stained in order to be able to see the individual bands of the different proteins. When the gel is stained, the protein distances will be able to be measured and compared. For a detailed procedure, refer to the Comparative Proteomics Kit I: Protein Profiler Module Lab Manual.
We placed the gel into the running chamber, and then we completely covered the gel with TAE. 3 microliters of loading dye was added to each tube; this would help distinguish the enzyme from the gel. As before, we tapped the tube on the table to mix. Then we carefully added each of the four samples into their own wells. A total of 33 microliters of each sample was poured into each well. Afterwards, we attached the positive and negative electrodes to their corresponding terminals on the power supply and gel box. We turned on the power to around 80 volts and waited 45-60 minutes for the loading dye to move down the gel approximately 6-8 cm. Finally, we were able to visualize the DNA in the gel and write down the
You can tell because the protein was not digested in tube #1. There was no color change & a density of 0.__
ELISA works on the principle of an antigen binding to specific antibody (lock and key), which can be used as a way to identify quantities of proteins in a small sample of fluid. The specific proteins used in an ELISA are estimated quantitatively. The ELISA test is carried out by incubating the serum that contains the antigen of interest with antibody’s within a well, in order for the antibody’s to bind with the specific antigens. The plate is then washed with a mild detergent in order to remove any proteins that have not been bound. The washing of the plates is carried out between every step in order
After the substrate solution was added, five drops of the enzyme were quickly placed in tubes 3, 4 and 5. There were no drops of enzyme added in tubes 1 and 2 and in tube 6 ten drops were added. Once the enzyme solution has been added the tubes were then left to incubate for ten minutes and after five drops of DNSA solution were added to tubes 1 to 6. The tubes were then placed in a hot block at 80-90oC for five minutes. They were then taken out after the five minute period and using a 5 ml pipette, 5 ml of distilled water were added to the 6 tubes and mixed by inversion. Once everything was complete the 6 tubes were then taken to the Milton Roy Company Spectronic 21 and the absorbance of each tube was tested.
Western blotting - In Western blotting first, the macromolecules have to be separated via gel electrophoresis. The molecules now separated by electrophoresis are blotted onto either a nitrocellulose or a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (a second matrix). To inhibit the binding of nonspecific antibodies to the membrane surface it is subsequently blocked. Then a complex is formed (a probe) from the protein that was transferred and an enzyme linked with an antibody. The enzyme is supplied a substrate then the 2 together should create a product e.g. chromogenic precipitate that can be detected. Detection methods with most sensitivity use chemiluminescent substrate because light is a by-product of the reaction between the substrate and the enzyme. The output of the light can be measured using a CCD camera or on the other hand, antibodies that have been tagged with fluorescents that are detected with a fluorescence imaging system can be used (Thermo-Fisher Scientific 2015).
3. The tubes are allowed to incubate in a 37˚C water bath for 1 hour. The final pH of the solutions is tested and the amount of protein digestion is estimated using a scale of (+++), (++), (+), and (-) by