preview

The Character Message in The Conjure Tales of Charles W. Chesnutt

Better Essays

Going back over the Goophered Grapevine and Po Sandy in "The Conjure Tales of Charles W. Chesnutt," I want to unfold the message Chesnutt is portraying through particular characters in these stories. Is the message the critics see, the same as the reader? I feel like Chesnutt contradicts himself in the conjure tales. By this I mean that he comes off to the reader as one thing, but he is interpreted by literary critics as something else. I think the reason that Chesnutt's work seems contradictory is because he has many voices throughout the stories and it is hard for the reader to distinguish which voice belongs to Chesnutt. Should these stories be looked upon as mere entertainment or as something else? According to Richard E. Baldwin, …show more content…

William Andrews saw that Chesnutt used the "old-time Negro" model to create Uncle Julius (Chesnutt, 378). Looking at the Goophered Grapevine, one of the main characters, Julius, is seen as being a trickster. He seems to lie in order to fulfill his own desires. The author is reaffirming the stereotypes of blacks by using the character in this manner. Which is, they are liars and they will do anything to achieve what they need or want. This is how the old slave was exploited. Although they were faithful in years they were portrayed as willing to steal or kill to get what they needed. The reader is not sympathetic with Julius in the two stories. The other two main characters are John, the narrator, and his wife Annie. According to Duncan, John and Julius "negotiate a new... relationship between two previously isolated American voices: the black and the white, the rich and the poor, the North and the South (Duncan, 78)." John and his wife represent two sides of the white community; those who hold the beliefs of the plantation school and those that are sympathetic with the Negro and their condition (slavery, post-slavery). It appears that Chesnutt made the narrator a white male for a reason. This is done in order to "articulate expressions of doubt [which] make him a suitable proxy for both the wary

Get Access