The Consequences Of The President's Centurial Rating

The Electoral College fails to accurately reflect the nation’s popular will; a group of less than 700 people can’t perpetually know the nation’s opinion, this results in plenty (perhaps a majority of) Americans being disconsolate with whom they have as a leader. The group fails to be

First who they are running against, this could be a good or bad thing, for the candidate juxtaposed could be extremely popular or extremely unpopular giving the candidate the win or the loss. Second off the time period and what is going on in the nation could effect what the us wants in an president with opposing view when compare one candidate could be more important to the voters than the others. The rhetorical presidency was introduced by James Ceaser, Glen E. Thurow, Jeffrey Tulis, and Joseph Bessette in 1981 to the political science terminology. It became as popular as the southern strategy (In politics, the Southern strategy is the use of gaining political support in the Southern United States by appealing to white southerners, many of whom were originally Democratic voters ) introduced by the republicans in the 1950’s and 1960’s but was famously used by Richard Nixon. The popular presidents were able to use either radio or television to increase their likeability and also increase the chance of them being voted into presidency. The unpopular presidents try to use these devices too but they result in an very negative effect causing them to lose the political ground and either cost you presidency or make them extremely unlikeable. Which caused a lot of negativity towards them and tumbled into an reoccurring problem with their politics and getting

Although it seems otherwise, it is important to remember that the population of this nation is foremost and the political agendas should not be employed unless supported by the nation’s people. Donald Trump is the 45th president of the United States and the fifth president to enter office, even though he lost the national popular vote. The only way the people’s choice will prevail in the presidential elections is to employ a popular vote. Essentially, abolishing the Electoral College system is the most effective and efficient way to enact change. According to sources, “By overwhelming majorities, Americans would prefer to elect the president by direct popular vote, not filtered through the antiquated mechanism of the Electoral College” (Vespa, 2016). The Electoral College system is obviously faulty, “Because almost all states use a winner-take-all system, the election ends up being fought in just a dozen or so “battleground” states, leaving tens of millions of Americans on the sidelines” (Vesper, 2016). According to Stanford professors, the national popular vote is much more beneficial for choosing presidents compared to the Electoral College system thus, needs to be abolished. Stanford professors claim that, “Four out of five Americans exercised no real electoral voice in the 2012 presidential election due to the winner-take-all

Trust in the election process is key to democracy. Without this there is no peaceful transition of power, which has been a keystone of the American political system (Wattenburg). One reason for this doubt is the chance for faithless electors. Faithless electors is an elector who does not cast their vote for the candidate that won their state (“Faithless Electors”). For example, if an elector voted for Trump when their state’s popular vote was won by Clinton. This means a person casts their vote for the winning candidate, and the electors in their state do not have to listen to their vote. Another source of doubt comes from the possibility of electing a minority president. The 2016 election showed the devastating results of electing a minority president. When Trump won riots erupted across the nation. The biggest ones being in the major cities of Portland, Oakland, and Los Angeles. In these cities the rioters chanted “Not my President” (Ansari). They also vandalized buildings and cars while throwing fireworks, molotov cocktails and other objects at officers. This led too many rests including 185 arrested in Los Angeles alone (Ansari). If the United States of America cannot keep the transition of power peaceful our country will fall

In addition, ideally, the president should not be someone who primarily desires the fame and power that comes with the presidency. Instead, they should be someone who truly desires the good of the country, even if it will make them less popular. Take George Washington, for example. He was already a respected and well-liked leader, but he did not want to assume the position of president. In his inaugural speech, he said, “On the one hand, I was summoned by my Country, whose voice I can never hear but with veneration and love, from a retreat which I had chosen with the fondest predilection, and, in my flattering hopes, with an immutable decision, as the asylum of my declining years…” (Washington). He then went on to express how insufficient he felt for the task of being president.

This is clearly manifested by the rhetoric skills of President Obama but in contrast to the rhetoric actions constituting presidency, the majority of the presidents couldn’t be able to alter the public policy. So the modern system of presidency may well be frustrated due to its inability to solve or resolve the public policies issues and hence the chances of success. "Persuade us to conceive of ourselves in ways compatible with their views of government and the world” actually means that public wants the presidential candidates to convince them about their messages, mottos and agenda for the common public of America and the world in general. People play role in the election of president in the rhetorical actions, so it is important that they should be given complete information about what and how the prospective president would portray his/her agenda after being elected as president. People in this era are more conscious about the policies which are going to be made in their good will by the president so they are to be informed with every little detail and clear manifestation of ideas may win the fame for some candidate and make him/her eligible candidate for the

Throughout American History, people expect those who run for president to fully understand the occupation and its role as president and the importance of soliciting their votes. During each election, America assumes that each candidate will thoroughly explain their positions and their values so that the people can become familiar with the candidate and begin to trust them. Over time, the way presidential candidates promote themselves to America continued to evolve in many different ways that connect more with people on a nation wide level. Also, each president has a role they must follow. They are expected to understand the qualifications of a president and its powers in position so they can truly be in running as the Chief Executive of the United States of America. Moreover, new ways of publicizing the campaigns, have become a major role in understanding each candidate. With that being said, strategizing and campaigning have changed dramatically as new technology was introduced. In early America, the presidents were limited to its abilities as laws were new and not concrete. Once the U.S. developed into its truest form, the government realized its strengths and weakness. While overcoming many obstacles in the colonies in the early times of America, then later being a whole nation as one, the government created a unique governmental system that included regulations for the president in order to keep America united and tranquil. In the early times of this nation, voting

Whilst their certainly is a trend for presidential power declining throughout their second terms, political circumstance is what ultimately determines how power a president can be. In a time of peace and with a healthy economy the president’s power is likely to decline during his second term EXAMPLE but in the case of war, economic turmoil or a nation XXXXXX like 9/11, the president’s power will be

The modern presidency of the United States has become a powerful institution. Most if not all the people in the United States know who the president is. The president has become a celebrity of sorts throughout history, and with that status rising the president have become more powerful. However, as the old saying goes, with the great power comes great responsibility.

The article, “How Presidents Shape Their Party’s Reputation and Prospects: New Evidence,” explains previous presidents and their popularity. There are five main questions that are stated regarding presidents’ popularity. Gary Jacobson, the author of this article, explains where he acquires his statistical research and his use of it throughout the article. Regarding the previous statements, there is a detailed description about the results that are found from the research. By the end of this review, the reader understands my overall opinion on this article. With this being said, what is the question the author hopes to answers, what method does the author use to answer the question, what is the answers found, and my thoughts on the article

There’s a lot to deal with when you are sitting in the big chair in the oval office. People don’t understand the pressure, the hard choices, and the people themselves. There is so much to take in when you’re leading a nation, like trying to reduce taxes, getting rid of pollution, and charging people when they can’t afford something. I mean, you should at least talk it over with the entire country, but what do I know? I’m just a citizen. The president doesn’t have complete power over everything, though, it is congress that has the real bang for their buck. No, the president is just a face and name to lay on the blame. Well, and look pretty. The president is more of a fall guy in terms of success and failure. If a bill is passed and it works,

“Presidents use various means to attempt to drive public opinion and effect political change. But history has shown that they are limited in their ability to drive public opinion. Favorable conditions can help a president move policies forward. These conditions include party control of Congress and the arrival of crises such as war or economic decline” (480). In other circumstances the presidential power is limitless. While the power of the presidency is typically checked by the other two branches of government, presidents have the unencumbered power to pardon those convicted of federal crimes and to issue executive orders, which don’t require congressional approval but lack the permanence of laws passed by Congress. In matters concerning foreign policy, presidents have at their disposal the executive agreement, which is a much-easier way for two countries to come to terms than a treaty that requires Senate ratification but is also much narrower in scope”

The President was elected to run the country and therefore, has the most power of any individual. However, he cannot make a majority of the decisions alone and must make sure he keeps the approval of others in order to keep his job. The Constitution struck a fairly proper balance between empowering and limiting power of the President of the United States, but limited the power more so than empowering. Although the Constitution claimed the President as the leader of the Unites States, he is not able to single-handedly make decisions that affect our country. He is a large influence in a majority of the decisions in the government of the United States. However, he does not have complete authority over others and many of the decisions are

Imagine for a moment being put in the president’s shoes and having to make a decision that affects the whole country. Imagine that the decision you made is not very popular and that you get criticized and scoffed at for it. During the term of each president, there are many difficult decisions that must be made. Making these types of decisions may be difficult, but they are necessary to the benefit of the country.

In the twenty-fourth chapter of Voices of a People's History of the United States, Howard Zinn and Anthony Arnove expose the 'War on Terror' over the course of the Bush II and Obama administrations. To begin, the authors remind that Bush II was inaugurated as president by the Supreme Court after he failed to collect more votes than Al Gore. In "The Presidency-Just Another Perk", Michael Moore illustrated the absurdity of Bush's rise to power using money and name instead of genuine merit. He writes, "'Trust the machines, not the people,' you pleaded. But the judge didn't buy it, and perhaps for the first time in your life, someone said 'no' to you" (Moore 13). But just as Moore put it, Bush always gets what he wants. In response to the