The Effect of Think Alouds on Mathematical Reasoning
Chrystal Paddock
Concordia University
The Effects of Think Alouds on Mathematical Reasoning
This literature review endeavors to draw connections between several studies regarding thinking aloud and mathematical reasoning in mathematics classrooms. This review investigates the question: do think alouds in middle school improve mathematical reasoning? Mathematical reasoning involves formulating conjectures, sense-making with mathematical concepts and making reasonable judgements, which may serve to support inquiry and exploration. From group collaboration to individual work, students were prompted to vocalize their thinking and understanding in various settings in an attempt to
…show more content…
Self-explanation
Self-explanation is the process of describing understanding as expressed in one’s own words. Think alouds engage students in self-explanation, describing their mathematical process and reasoning. Monaghan (2005) found that students benefit from externalizing their own thinking. Reviewing transcribed group conversations uncovers students sharing mathematical processes and thinking and leveraging their understanding to present and support a convincing argument for the mathematical processes chosen (Monaghan, 2005). This not only accomplishes effective group collaboration resulting in more accurate and complete work, but under the ground rules, provided each member an opportunity to vocally contribute. Chi, et al. (1994) discuss the implications of self-explanation comparing a control group of students who recites and excerpt from a text twice to the test group who recites the same text, but after each passage is prompted to self-explain. Overwhelmingly the test group outperformed the control group, more accurately and more completely recalling circulatory system knowledge. These findings have a potentially profound impact on math students engaging in think alouds. Montague et al. (1993) and Rosenzweig et al. (2011) also made extensive use of think alouds, but the purpose was to vocalize thought to evaluate for cognitive and
In a math classroom, the teacher cannot neglect the need for providing a print rich environment. “Word walls are a technique that many classroom teachers use to help students become fluent with the language of mathematics. It is vital that vocabulary be taught as part of a lesson and not be taught as a separate activity” (Draper, 2012). Draper acknowledges the fact that words in mathematics may be confusing for students to study as “words and phrases that mean one thing in the world of mathematics mean another in every day context. For example, the word “similar” means “alike” in everyday usage, whereas in mathematics similar has to have proportionality” (Draper, 2012). Fites (2002) argues that the way a math problem is written drastically will effect a student’s performance, not just in reading the problem, but in solving the math equation as well. There is where the misinterpreting of different word meanings in math comes into play. Fites continues with the importance of understanding vocabulary not just in reading but for math as well with the correlation between improved vocabularies in math yields improvement on verbal problem solving
This paper will demonstrate the pre-service teachers’ understanding of mathematical practices as part of the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics. It will address two specific standards for Mathematical Practices, describing the essence of both and providing a description of how teachers facilitate these practices and how students are engaged in the practices.
When the practitioners are planning, they can also ensure that they involve all children no matter what the mathematical ability to allow group learning and supporting one another which Vygotsky (Richard Culatta, 2015) says is how children learn best. Practitioners should plan for an enabling environment that promotes maths by surrounding the children in mathematical concepts and language, to support emergent maths. Practitioners should praise children. Practitioners should support all children’s development to ensure children and school ready and they are developing their emergent
Anghileri, J. (2006). Children's mathematical thinking in the primary years perspectives on children's learning (Repr. 2006. ed.). London: Continuum.
Problem Solving, Numeracy and Reasoning: Helping to expand their knowledge of problem solving using stories, games, role play, singing and games. Making the child feel easy talking about and understanding the language of reasoning and problem solving.
Van de Walle, J, Karp, K. S. & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2015). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Teaching Developmentally. (9th ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.
Students engage in the discussion on a picture drawn on an interactive whiteboard (IWB) with the concept of mathematics in the form of art.
communicating mathematical thinking orally, visually, and in writing, using everyday language, grade-appropriate mathematical vocabulary, and a variety of representations and conventions
The article, “Punch Up Algebra with POWs,” by Mark Pinkerton and Kathryn Shafer begins by stressing the importance of problem solving abilities since it leads to understanding mathematical concepts. The authors stress that students need to be given the opportunity to “reason and make sense of mathematics.” The article examines co-author, Mark Pinkerton’s, yearlong experience that was designed to provide constant problem solving opportunities for his students. (Pinkerton & Shafer, 2013).
As a prospective mathematics teacher, I want to make thinking visible to my students. I want them to be able to express their ideas and be able to elaborate on their answers. Two types of thinking I would like to promote in my classroom are critical and creative thinking because mathematics is a subject that involves both when it comes to problem solving. Critical and creative thinking promote higher levels of student engagement and involves opportunities to investigate skills and concepts in a much wider setting. I want to teach mathematics in a way that has meaning and relevance, rather than through boring isolated topics.
What is the most effective way to teach? Can students really learn and fully understand the material teachers convey to them on a day to day basis? According to a middle school mathematics teacher, his methods of teaching the traditional way was not as effective and producing a long-term impact as he would have liked. The article "Never Say Anything a Kid Can Say!" enriches us to the possibility of applying slight gradual modifications to our teaching methods and how we could find ways to utilize that information in the search for more effective teaching methods to encourage students to explain their thinking and become more deeply involved in the classroom discussions, thus developing their questioning skills (Reinhart, 2000). After
Traditionally, mathematics and language-based subjects have been seen as occurring on opposite sides of a great divide. However, in recent years teachers have realised the importance of talk across the curriculum including mathematics. This is supported by the DfEE (1999a, p11) who state that ‘high quality interactive teaching is oral, interactive and lively. It is a two way process in which pupils are expected to play an interactive role by answering questions, contributing points to discussions, and explaining and demonstrating their methods to the class.’ The recent Cambridge review reinforced the message that ‘teachers
Multiplicative thinking is imperative to a child’s understanding of important mathematical concepts and is seen as the ‘big idea’ in number that links multiple key ideas and strategies (Vergnaud, as cited in Siemon, 2011). Commonly, children have a procedural based view of multiplicative thinking which can hinder progress, as opposed to a more conceptual view which is a far better learning framework (Hurst & Hurrell, 2016). If teachers are to maximise a child’s learning, they must acknowledge this and help children maintain a conceptual understanding of multiplicative thinking and emphasise this much more so than procedural rules. Several key ideas and strategies underpin the success of multiplicative thinking and a greater conceptual understanding.
When teaching mathematical concepts it is important to look at the big ideas that will follow in order to prevent misconceptions and slower transformation
Mathematics is a type of reasoning. Thinking mathematically includes thinking in a rational way, developing and checking conjectures, understanding things, and forming and validating judgments, reasoning, and conclusions. We show mathematical habits when we acknowledge and explain patterns, build physical and theoretical models of sensations, develop sign systems to assist us stand for, control, and review concepts, and create treatments to address issues (Battista, 1999).