There are currently two types of food systems that exist in our food shed. TINA, which comes from Maggie Thatcher, who said, “There Is No Alternative” to global economy—T-I-N-A” (Shuman, 2002). And LOIS, which stands for “Local Ownership and Import Substitution” (Shuman, 2002). TINA is the system that has been used for the pasted 60 to 70 years, and throughout that time the way we produced are food has become both productive and efficient; but it has also become destructive and unhealthy. In A TINA-based food economy, food is either mass produced through the process of industrial farming or it is imported from other countries. These lead to adverse effects on the food, the environment and the economy. However, in a LOIS-based food economy, food is “produced locally through locally owned businesses, then the more you can minimize your vulnerability to nasty surprises, the more you can maximize your economic multiplier, and the more you can maximize tax proceeds to the public sector and the many good things that come from it.” (Shuman, 2002). So in simpler terms the more you produce locally, the better local economies will be and if local economies have a large income then the nations income will increase by way of tax. Along with being good for our economy, LOIS has little to no adverse effect on our environment or health. Compared to TINA, LOIS looks like paradise, but just like every dream world, the LOIS system is currently an impossible system to live by. As I said
Food industries trick he/she into buying their food by using words that sound healthier. Words like ''natural'' sound better, but natural is still a chemical made in a lab. Fast foods are not completely honest with the ingredients they use. We eat foods that say fat-free but fat hasn't been the problem with weight gain; it is sugar. Food Industries use more sugar or sweetener to make food taste better when they remove fat. The fat-free product causes the consumer to eat more because he or she may think it is ok too, but it is far worse to eat. Eating so much sugar can lead to high blood pressure and more health problems. The dangers of fast food can lead to significant weight gain, health problems, and more money spendings.
Economically the world has changed substantially through the influence of the fast food industry. Drastically¬ forcing our generation, to transform our lifestyle in order to fully adapt the social, health and economical state we live in. Our family structures have evolved forcefully, as the demand of easy, efficient, manageable meals are now within a reach of a hand. This sets the foundation of the fast developing industry. Maximizing their profits to the extent of risking the innocent delicate lives, as we ingest the dirty, artificial food, we are the ones responsible for the increasing epidemic of this generations obesity and health problem.
The locavore movement encourages people in towns to consume more locally grown food, by society consuming locally grown food transportation is cut down which helps better the environment. Since locally grown food is produce that is cultivated in the community transportation is down to a minimum which is a blessing for the environment. “ Eating local is better for air quality and pollution than eating organic. “ ( Source A ) less transportation use helps lessen the pollution in the air which in turn helps provide the community with cleaner fresher air. “ The move towards local food for all its trendiness highlights one of the problematic pieces of the modern food economy : the increasing reliance on foods shipped halfway round the world. “ ( Source E ) The
The majority of Americans enjoy fast food like bees enjoy their honey. Fast food is hard not to love due to families experiencing fast paced days, parents who work more than 20 hours a week, and having children with picky appetites can be rough. For most American families, it can be a challenge to not consider eating fast food more than once a week. The fast food industry has grown tremendously through the years. The one restaurant that is known all over the world for their golden arches and their big macs is McDonalds. With knowledge and personal experiences, I can say that McDonalds is by far the worst fast food restaurant in America. I believe this due to how unhealthy the food is for our bodies, the disturbing facts about the happy meals, the poor service, and the non-cleanliness of the restaurant.
The industrial food system began with the McDonald brothers and fast food. The food Inc. video talks about the issues with food in supermarkets, and the main one is how it factory modified. The video also talks about how many big businesses there really are in our country that produce food, and how the small amount is it problem. The video states that the average supermarket has 47,000 food products in it. Another thing the video talks about is the condition of the animals that are being slaughtered and made into store product foods and the condition of the workplace in the factories. Most importantly the video talks about how farms are enslaved to these major industries, and have no choice but to stay and work for them because of various reasons.
In theory, locavorism is designed to establish stable, sustainable food economies in many communities throughout the nation. While conducting business with large, out-of-town corporations takes money out of local economies, buying and selling local goods generate money for local economies (Source A). With the federal government investing billions of dollars “in the health and nutrition of American children”, the small farmers, who grow the majority of local products appearing in supermarkets, will be able to contribute to their communities’ internal cash flows for years by expanding their access to farmers markets and locally grown produce. (Source E). Finally, in addition to creating jobs at a local level, a locally sourced food economy cuts
A supporter of the local food movement would argue, buying locally produced food is safer, more nutritious and stimulates the local economy. This is a warm and inviting illusion, reality proves to be quite the opposite. If every individual followed the ways of the locavore, farmers around the world would in turn suffer from the lack of demand for their quality product. As for sustainability of the local economy, there are communities in impoverished countries that are technically locavore perfection. They consume locally produced crops and livestock because of the extreme expenses involved with modern agricultural inputs and transportation. This perfect domain of locavorism “… is one in which average cereal crop yields are at best one-fifth those of advanced economies, average incomes hover around $1 a day, the probability of being malnourished is approximately one in three…”(Desrochers and Shimizu 34). Nor is there enough useable land on the earth to sustainability feed the growing population with inefficient (local) methods. Specialization and international trade are essential for the continuance of globalization, which brings improvement for all. Switching to locally produced food would not only decrease
Is Soylent bringing an end to our everyday food? Even though this answer is not clear, there are many positive and negative speculations about new discoveries in nutrition such as Soylent. Many people have found ways to improve the quality of our diet and have completely innovated the world of food. This new revolution of food seeks to enhance our quality of life and to make food as beneficial as possible. However, this dream can also be perceived as a nightmare, for this revolution may completely take over our diet and change the way we use food. This change causes much discomfort among people who have grown accustomed to the food they see everyday, and they do not want to fix something that has not been broken. Products such as Soylent represent a future of food fueled by hopes and dreams, but if we are not careful, this dream can quickly turn into a nightmare.
Throughout human history, food has always been a major influence towards society. Whether it may advocate changes of culture, formulate emotional bonding, it can also aggravate towards poverty. According to modern society, the latter has it that food has become an abundant resource to some parts of the world, so much that they're even throwing it away. Articles "Half of US food goes to waste" and "In a world of abundance, food waste is a crime" speak briefly on the matter, mainly concerning of the US about how food is treated and the effects it has in contrast. Although "Half of US food goes to waste" does share interesting points along with some informative research data, "In a world of abundance, food waste is a crime" quantifies a rather
Too many people pick up food products off of the shelves and put it into their shopping cart without knowing what exactly it is or what the product has been through. After watching an absolutely disturbing documentary called "Food Inc." I started to feel strongly about the problems of the Food Industry. The problem is that our food is no longer being produced in an all American farm, but in dirty abusive factories. Not only is the food unhealthy for us after all of the processing, but the workers and animals are being abused. I know that I single handily cannot change all of the problems with the twisted food industry, but I know that I can do my part by making others aware so that they can make sure that they can make fully informed decisions about what they are putting into their carts at the grocery store and eventually into their bodies.
The Industrial Food System is an easy and fast way for Americans to put food on their table. The question is how the Industrial Food System impacts Americans lives and health. Before the Industrial Revolution people had to rely upon themselves and their communities. Back then their wasn't a store in the corner where it was easy to purchase food instantly. Food was produced locally by farmers who worked in agricultural fields. Ever since factory farms took over their are fewer "organic red farms". These modernized factories host a serious of environmental problems. A cause of running these farms are air and water pollution. Farm factory workers and people who live near by are subjected to serious respiratory and cardiac diseases caused by the
The United States provides accessibility to an unlimited diversity of food. Restaurants such as Golden Corral allow people to eat as much as they can. However, what could be wrong with eating? It was not until I was talking to my grandmother that I became aware of the problem of overconsumption. My grandmother, who is originally from the Dominican Republic, has never seen so much food on one plate. She was surprised when she saw the big food portions served in the United States compared to her native country. Overconsumption of food has progressively become worst over the past few years. This problem is not only affecting the population by causing obesity, but it is also affecting our environment, society and economic system. As I was
Fast food, the highly addictive food that many people can not go a day without eating. In our society today fast food has become the “norm” when we are looking for something to eat, causing our society to accept it as something to be eaten ALL the time. Fast food can affect our bodies more than most people comprehend. According to the United States Healthful Food Council, they say 8 out of 10 people eat fast food monthly and half say they even eat it weekly. By ingesting these large amounts of fatty, salty, and sweet foods, children and adults are becoming increasingly obese. Fast food causes long term negative health effects and is a direct contributor to America 's increasing obesity problems.
There are several factors that have influenced the many decisions that we make in terms of the things that we eat. The government, scientists, corporations, and globalization all have affected the price, content, as well as the choice of foods that we can buy at supermarkets. A lot of people don’t know that each one of those factors has aided in the creation of each effect. First, we will explore how globalization has directly impacted the price of the foods that we eat. Second, we will discuss the ways in which scientists and corporations have both played a role in the things that are put into our foods. Lastly, we will touch base on the ways in which the government has played a role in all of the effects but specifically how they have controlled the choice of foods that we buy. All of these factors are connected through certain laws and legislation but they all differ in their impacts on what we eat and the prices of those foods.
As you pick up that bag of chips from the store, do you ever think about what the food industry has done to ensure that you get addicted to those chips to the point where you can’t put them down? A very popular brand of chips is Lays. They like to sell their brand by saying "You can 't eat just one.” The sad thing about this is that it’s true, they are not lying. Now, did Lays actually believe it, or were they just trying to say something catchy that people could remember? You aren’t just getting addicted to the chips, you’re getting addicted to the sugar, fat, and salt put in them. Going behind our backs, the food industry is tricking our brains so that we constantly buy their food. A NY times article came out with a statistic that I