The European Union (EU) has been proactive in establishing environmental, health and safety regulations and fostering industrial exploitation of R&D on nanotechnology by bringing together stakeholders to discuss best practices for commercialization, the societal, political and psychological barriers to entrepreneurship in Europe and license arrangements between industry and R&D organizations. Several European-wide initiative have been discussed a collaborative effort to promote the R&D nanotechnology for security purposes. In 2008, eleven EU member states invested €15.5 million for emerging defensive technologies, including nanotechnologies. However, the EU’s nanotechnology R&D focuses on the growth of a diversified nanotechnology market in Europe and promotes innovations critical for both economic growth and regional defense and stability. However, German government officials emphasize the importance of international regulatory regime over domestic governance strategies to address the potential issues of nano-security. Germany does not fund the nanotechnology R&D for military applications, even for defensive purposes. In contrast to Germany, the United Kingdom has a strong sense of international security responsibility. It has been funding in military nanotechnology R&D for security, allocating approximately £1.5 million annually. In Sweden, government authorities in charge with science policy are investing €11M over five years in nanotechnology activities. Funds
President John Adams had sent several delegates, one of them being John Martial, to France to help sort out the issues between France and the US, such as the United States not honoring the Franco-American Treaty, formed back during the American Revolution, when France had its revolution, by meeting with minister Talleyrand of France. Three of Talleyrand’s men met with the delegates and told them Talleyrand refused to meet unless a large amount of money was payed. The delegates returned home and informed President Adams, who was outraged. The name of the Affair comes from the substituting of the three French men’s’ names with X, Y, and Z in a Congress report.
Jones, Richard A.L. "Nanotechnology Will Not Contribute to a "Singularity"" Nanotechnology. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. of "Rupturing the Nanotech Rapture."
have to agree on one issue. There is also a financial cost of being a
Language is a complex system that we use to communicate with others every single day. It is taught, learned, and developed as we grow. For a Canadian teen who is considering learning a second language, they should pick up on Spanish. Upon learning a second language, there is nothing but benefits that come from it and will be extremely useful in the future as it opens up more opportunities for valuable connections, improved cognitive abilities, and [ something here ].
The article, Nanotechnology in the Military by Will Soutter, discusses the many ways in which the government is investing in nanotechnology research for military use. The article points out that nanotechnology is something that many countries are starting to spend large amounts of money to fund research on ways to use nanotechnology for military advancement. The main focus for military advancement through nanotechnology would be better medical care and better clothing for protection and to communicate. In the article the Ministry of Defense predicts that nano-bots could soon be used to help with medical care. In addition, communication devices could be nano-enhanced by 2030. Researchers are looking for ways to use nanotechnology to improve
Additionally, advocates of state intervention and promotion (industrial policy) believe that technological development, particularly the nanotechnology sector, requires a substantial amount of government funding and management because of its complexity and challenges. John F. Sargent, specialist in science and technology policy, strongly argues that active federal government role is or almost imperative to allow for commercialization of nanotechnology and further expansion of technological development (Sargent 22). The reason for this is because advocates of state intervention believe that the private sector is insufficient in funding technological development in which, therefore, may cause a stagnant growth and inefficiency. As a matter of fact, without government intervention, advocates believe that the United States' nanotechnology development and research would not have preserved its dominance and high position in the technology business and competition in the first place. Ideally, advocates claim that the influence of industrial policy and appropriate institutional mechanism has allowed the technological benefits to spread worldwide.
I’ve got marvelous news! I have found an amazing piece of land, and I am proposing on creating a new city to add onto our vast empire. I have considered all the advantages, and disadvantages very carefully, and I believe it is a great opportunity. It seems that the advantages are dominant over the disadvantages.
This illustrates that Albany has the needed support of industries in competitive areas, which is a great start for it to become a nanotechnology cluster. As for the Dresden team’s role, it should pass on their experiences along with the refined methods of process operations to the new fab. Like AMD Dresden’s beginning, Albany should send its managers and engineers to Dresden for training in order to copy its successful formula. However, processes can be copied exactly but culture can’t. AMD Dresden’s success is not only the processes of its operations, but it includes the people and the culture of Germany. Many industries in Germany are well known for the attention to detail, innovation, and precision engineering. This is not something that can be easily copied. Therefore, AMD’s strategy for Dresden and Albany is to divide them into different areas. The key to success understands the real strength of Dresden, and that is their ability of innovation. Dresden should become the innovation and research focus center while Albany takes control of manufacturing and development.
France, which is the largest nation in Western Europe, is a presidential republic. France is a very important nation in Europe and it continues to be involved in contemporary policy issues. Helping the world as one of the great trading nations, France is a very important trading partner with the United States. Not only is France important to the United States, they are also important to countries all over the world. Their abundance of both mineral and agricultural resources make them a very important supplier of products all over the world. I chose to report on France because it is an interesting county and I wanted to learn more about it.
Nanotechnology is the development of atoms in a certain object. Nanotechnology has become very popular in the past few years. It is a way to rebuild the systems of life. To make systems move faster than ever before. Nanometer is about 10 times the size of an atom. Each of these has a huge effect on a system. Still there are questions out there that keep people wondering how important nanotechnology is to us. Many wonder how will it affect them and if we should continue this research. I myself wondered about nanotechnology. After researching this topic I have learned new and interesting facts to help me understand the entire concept.
European Union represents economic and political partnership of 28 states, with population more than 500 million people who can travel within its territory without considering internal borders. It operates as a single market with standardized laws and guaranteed freedom of movement of people, goods, services and capital. As such, European Union is attractive destination for all kind of immigrants, from people in search of a better life from unfortunate and unstable regions to highly qualified work force who are looking for greater business opportunities. As European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said in an interview for Time Magazine (Oct. 24,2007) “Europe is an
People have created unions many times but not all of them were successful, specifically when we consider alliances among number of countries with different economics, political systems and culture. For instance, last century brought both the biggest collapse and the most promising union in the modern history. Although U.S.S.R has disappeared from geographical maps, some of its members joined another alliance. The European Union (EU) is an economic and political partnership that united 28 countries on the European part of Eurasia and represents a unique form of cooperation among members today.
The European Union aims to promote unity and equality amongst the fellow member states. In order to provide this sense of concord the European Union allows free movement of citizens apart of the union. The access to all members’ states solidifies a bond of the union but this free movement also allows for negative issues to arise. Due to the free movement amongst the EU many people are easily trafficked throughout the countries. The concept of this free movement is great for the people, but also many people are suffering from a violation of their human rights. The EU aims to continue to support free movement of their people, but they must focus on ways to prevent human trafficking from occurring throughout the member states.
The European Union (EU) was established in order to prevent the horrors of modern warfare, experienced by most of Europe during the World Wars of the 20th century, from ever ensuing again, by aiming to create an environment of trust with the countries of Europe cooperating in areas such as commerce, research and trade (Adams, 2001). The EU has evolved into an economic, trade, political and monetary alliance between twenty-eight European Member States. While not all Member States are in monetary union (i.e. share the currency of the euro), those that are form the ‘Euro-zone’ (Dinan, 2006). The EU can pass a number of types of legislation, with a regulation, act, or law, being the most powerful. Its ‘tricameral’ (European Union, 2007)
The influence on the national economics in Latvia already can be felt, even before entering the EU. Since negotiation of European contract in 1995, there has been an intensive integration process going on in Latvia - readjustments of legislation, increasing trade with the EU countries and big amount of investments has been received from foreign investors.