As said here by a parent: "I'm just trying to keep my little girl a little girl," she said. (Anderson). According to Anderson a committee remember named Maria Lewis said the book taught valuable lessons. Parents agree that the book is teaching a valuable lesson on how the society that Jonas is in is trying to shield people from how painful life can be, just like how the parents are doing. Later in the novel Jonas just stops taking pills, he decides on his own that it’s not what he wants. As said here: “The next morning, for the first time, Jonas did not take his pill. Something within him, something that had grown there through the memories, told him to throw the pill away.” (Lowry 133). The book says that something within him told him to throw the pill away, but the reader realized that Jonas discovered his free will. …show more content…
Especially a book like The Giver, what makes this book amazing is how it incorporated controversial issues. Lowry took the stance of challenging the reader, so they could fight within their own minds and to take form their own opinion on the issues. The definition of good literature should be literature that makes the audience think. By banning books, it takes away the freedom that people must form opinions, it limits their freedom to explore. The banning of The Giver is the same as what the community tried to do, its 2suppressing the reader od anything that will stimulate their brains. Lowry
The Giver by Lois Lowry is a book about a utopian society that this world could one day become. Released in 1993, The Giver has been extremely controversial in American schools. Many believe that is should be allowed in schools; however there is also a great deal who think it should be banned from all schools. There has been over eleven thousand attempts to remove the book from school libraries; one third of those attempts actually resulted in the removal of the book from schools; however The Giver should not be banned in schools because it makes students think, has a lot of historical and written connections, and stresses values important for school age children.
Isn't banning books disobeying the freedom of speech, and infringing on the freedom of the press? First Amendment, states that "citizens must be free to seek out any media, regardless of content, that they deem appropriate for entertainment, information, or education. With said, banning books stunts the extension of education. In addition, Books containing “Racial Issues, Blasphemous Dialogue, and Sexual Situations” parents' supervision is indicated. So, if read by children; banning books will not be an antidote for bad parenting. But, Most opponents of book banning understand parental preferences regarding their own child’s reading material, but they refuse to grant them the right to make a decision on behalf of all parents about what is or isn’t appropriate. The disadvantages, books can teach you a negative habits and that’s why some books should be banned. Literature will fully-develop children for the real-world.
After meeting the Giver, Jonas stopped taking his pills. As a result, his stirrings returned, but he continued to not take his pills. In the novel it stated, “The next morning, for the first time, Jonas didn’t take his pill. Something within him,
One of the biggest points of the book is the outlawing of books. This is because books almost all have opinions and they were written in a time where people voiced their opinions and weren’t
There are multiple reasons that contribute to banning a book, these reasons are mostly drawn from the disapproval expressions targeted towards the content of the book. Even though the reasoning has a valid explanation, it is important to acknowledge the liberty that is being taken away because of this.
The freedom to read and express ourselves means that we shouldn’t allow the banning of books due to inappropriate material. I have gone to a private school all of my life and I have never experienced books being banned or taken away during school. I am thankful for that, but yet it is highly unfortunate knowing that some public school students did not have the opportunity to read some of the best books ever written. Amazing books such as Harry Potter, To Kill a Mockingbird, and Catcher in the Rye were banned from public schools and these are books that I love and would definitely recommend. I believe the banning of books is unconstitutional and deprives people of learning about the world around them; they also help us learn new ways of thinking and social skills that can be applied to real life.
Book banning is something that was been around for almost as long as books have, but why? Book banning started because certain books made different people or different groups of people feeling challenged, uncomforted, offended, etc. In other words, these books were engaging to the reader, pushed them to their limits, and really made them think about what they were reading. This is exactly what readers should want out of a book. Instead of embracing the books, many decide to get rid of it and do not want to be challenged or forced to step outside of their little, comfortable box they have for themselves. This issue of book banning is something that has gone on long enough and needs to end right now. Books are something that should be cherished and protected, not banned. Books are a very important part of today’s society and should not ever be banned.
How many of you have heard of the book The Lord of the Rings? Or how about Harry Potter and the Sorcerer Stone? Did you know that at one point in time for some reason or another these books were banned? They even banned a childhood classic Where The Wild things Are (TeenVogue.com). Even here in Pasco county Books like Looking for Alaska and Perks Of Being A Wallflower were banned from all school library shelves. The fact is since nineteen eighty two eleven thousand three hundred books have been banned due to violence, negativity or political bias. In my opinion banning books is detrimental to the education process. Schools should not be allowed to ban books because this takes great works of literature away from young adults. There are many
And some books are so huge that perhaps one person could ruin it for everyone by having it be banned. For example, when How to Kill A Mocking Bird was being seen for ban, Philadelphia Inquirer reported on the issue saying that “Instead of admitting prejudice exists and confronting it, we find excuses to change the subject. Harper Lee's banned book doesn't let us do that, which is why more people should read it.” Jackson, H. (2017, 22 Oct.) And the point that’s being brought up is that a lot of books show problems and issues with our society but rather than accepting it and facing it, we want to avoid it and pretend they don’t exist. This will only damage us later in the future since we are trying to set a standard of no bad things existing. But sometimes it might be good to ban a book, as seen with a report done by the Wall Street Journal when they interviewed author Simon Griffin about some of his ‘questionable’ book titles that have offended people and he stated, ‘“Obviously I do feel bad about that," said Mr. Griffin, the author. "The intention of the book was never to upset."’ Cronin, B. (2017, 02 Feb). Even though it’s not the best option, sometimes it might be good to ban a book like this because of the title, even though the easier option is just changing the title or censoring it, maybe it should be
The American Library Association promotes the freedom to choose or the freedom to express one's opinions even if that opinion might be considered unorthodox or unpopular, and stresses the importance of ensuring the availability of those viewpoints to all who wish to read them. Free thought and expression are rights protected by the first amendment of the United States constitution however there are people that continue to fight to censor and ban materials that they find offensive. Banning books robs people from learning and forming their own opinions people who challenge books usually have good intentions claiming that they want to protect children from suggestive content, dangerous opinions and profanity. The Office of Intellectual Freedom reports the top three reasons for books to be challenged are that material is sexually explicit, contains offensive language or is unsuitable to any age group. Although we need to be aware of what we choose to expose our children and ourselves to banning and censoring does more harm than good. It is wrong to ban books, everyone deserves access and exposure to different perspectives so that they can expand their thinking and form their own opinions.
Media outlets such as public libraries are an option for the general public to go learn about the world around them. It offers books advertised to all age groups and view points. The idea of taking certain books off the shelf is the same as refusing to teach about a certain topic because the teacher doesn't enjoy it. While it may be true that these media outlets may offer some offensive content, it is important to understand opposing view point; while still disagreeing with them. By learning about multiple opinions on the same topic, it allows people to have better arguments and find pros and cons of each side and all together come up
Literature is art. Why would you ban art? When you go to an art galla, you see more nude bodies then you can imagine. The books that are being banned more than likely don't have pictures, they just go off of imagination. This can happen at any time. Peoples imaginations run rampid and they can depict anything with or without books. Why should people ban things that their kids have already experienced. But if I have the right to remove that book from the shelf—that work I abhor—then you also have exactly the same right and so does everyone else. And then we have no books left on the shelf for any of us.
First of all, the possession of someone’s freedom and the right to choose and read is essential else they’ll just become part of the silent majority, therefore the banning of particular books, to me, is nonsense.
First of all, the possession of someone’s freedom and the right to choose and read is essential, therefore the banning of particular books, to me, is nonsense. However, it is understandable that many books consist of uncomfortable explicit content which
Books have been being banned since the 16th century and is still occurring even today. Way back then in the 1400’s there were only so little copies of books that could be made, so when they wanted to get rid of a book they would destroy the copies by burning them. A few years later the printing press was invented which allowed more copies to made so burning books wasn't used quite as much but still was figurative. In the late 1630’s the first book ever to be officially banned was written by Thomas Morton's called the “New English Canaan.” It was banned because he told his own point of view on a crucial battle of the New World with lies against the puritans and took side with the Native Americans. Morton was then banished from his own country, but his work remains remembered today. Back then people were more concerned about religion and political views. Now people ban books for having bad language, violence, or sexual content. Our country is full of all these things, there's no way around it. But books give us the ability to question certain things and understand different viewpoints of different cultures. They help us deal with real life issues that occur every day and even just let go of all our stresses every each one of us is put through. Books that have educated us the history of America have been banned just because of a couple of parent complaints. Parents should not be allowed to ban books because it violates the first amendment, books promote imagination, and