In today’s society it’s easy to find something in a newspaper, magazine, or on television that portrays the scrutiny of guns in the home. While reading or viewing such opinions it can possibly influence one to see issues in a particular way. It is not my goal to persuade you to lean in a specific direction but to see the issue from different angles. When viewing both arguments you are faced with reflecting on your own opinion and possibly agreeing more firmly with your own choice or changing your outlook and coming across the subject in a new way. According the Cato Institute the Second Amendment to the Constitution reads: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear …show more content…
Presently, the law has been revised so that the background check is instantly completed by gun dealers through a national computer system and there is no longer a waiting period. In general, self-protection measures of different types can be effective, in the sense of reducing the risk of property loss in robberies and confrontational burglaries, compared to doing nothing or cooperating with the offender. Yet the most effective form of self-protection used is a gun. But owning a gun requires that the person be responsible and know the ramifications that encompass such a preference. Guns can be a valuable tool for self-defense and provides a chance for someone to square off with an intruder that has deliberately invaded their space. The image of an unknown criminal breaking into your house is important because it justifies keeping a gun in the home. This means that a gun allows anyone regardless of their statuette or physical health, they to can defend themselves from a criminal no matter how big or strong the criminal may be. Guns can also be a great way to prevent crime. It is likely that gun ownership can cut the rate of violent crimes because a criminal thinks you might be armed, they may be less likely to choose you as a victim. On the reverse when guns are banned, it is likely their will be low gun ownership among law-abiding
Tougher gun control laws will most certainly lead to less people owning guns. It is argued that if less people own guns, then those who choose to commit suicide using a gun will be saved. However, there is no direct correlation between those who choose to commit suicide and the amount of people who choose to own a gun (Thompson, 2001). Although gun
The most common reason why people argue that they need to have a gun is for safety, so they can protect themselves against burglars. If a burglar would come into your house, you would have a better chance defending yourself and your family with a gun, than if you did not have a gun. The number of concealed weapon owners is at an all time high. In comparison the number of homicides had drastically decreased alongside the growing rate of legal concealed weapons. This number had been nearly cut in half in the past 20 years(Goldberg).
The Second Amendment of The United States Constitution states, “[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
A majority of the American people feel that gun control laws will help reduce crime rates because the waiting period would allow time for a person’s temper to cool down. They also feel that gun control will prevent repeat offenders because when a person tries to purchase a handgun, he will have to fill out a lengthy questionnaire. The questionnaire will include questions about the buyer’s past, for example, if they have a criminal record or a record of any mental illness. If there is a criminal record in that person’s history, he will not be able to make the purchase. Restricting handgun ownership would also reduce crime, because guns are used most often in robberies and murders (Mayer 28). They are very easily concealed under a coat, or even in the waistband of pants.
Have you, as a citizen, ever wondered what would happen if a burglar broke into your home and in seconds, had you at gunpoint. There is nothing can be done but remain as a hostage in your own home. In a different scenario, those few seconds can help you access your weapon and be ready for any kind of situation. Carrying a weapon in your home protects your family and your property from any types of danger. Having a gun gives them at least a fighting chance in the event that a burglar or home invader manages to get in (Pros and Cons). Other than reinforcing doors and windows, having a gun would be the best choice in protecting your home. Not only that, guns can actually protect from something greater.
The second amendment states that, “A well-controlled militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to own arms, shall not be infringed.”
It has helped reduce the chance of one becoming a victim of a criminal attack. With a firearm, one could be in a position to protect on self in case he/she has been attacked. Research shows that about 55% of criminals or attackers retreat when the attacker has a gun at hand. Another study also shows that in an event of an attack, those that used guns to resist the attacks were less likely to get injured unlikely those who used their hands, canes or a baseball bat for example. With a firearm, one could also protect a group of people, for example, his/her family from an attack.
In a survey study, it is shown that 48% of people who owns a gun purchased them for their own security (Pew Research Center) and 57% of Americans said that owning firearms was beneficial for them from becoming victims of a crime (Williams). There are responsible owners of guns who used them to protect their loved ones such as Melinda Herman in Loganville, Georgia who protected her two children during a home invasion when she grabbed her handgun and used it protect her son and daughter after a burglar broken into the home (Brumback). Herman was alone with her children and her husband was away from the home and Herman utilized lessons she learned from a firing range session and wounded the burglar in her home with several bullet rounds and the police later arrived and arrested the man after he escaped elsewhere (Brumback). In addition, another case would be that of Ronald Dixon, a Navy veteran with 2 jobs and a father who protected his 2 children and girlfriend in Canarsie, Brooklyn after a man broke into their home during a home invasion (Haberman). Dixon shot and wounded the intruder, who is a thug with a very big record of burglaries and other crimes, and was later arrested at the scene of the crime (Haberman). Not only are guns necessary for home protection, but also in the general public as well. During a
"I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it."
More than half the homes in the United States possess firearms, so it is hardly surprising that they are among the ten leading causes of death, more than 30,000 deaths annually (Wintermute 1987, p. 3107). While most people have guns primarily for hunting and sports, many owners also have them for personal protection and security purposes.
The Second Amendment to the U. S. Constitution states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (United States of America).
The second amendment states that the people have the right to a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state and the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall
In a nation full of crime, there is the need for security and protection on one self. In order for individuals to protect themselves and their family, many people have a gun at home and sometimes carried gun in their cars. As stated by Witkin Gordon “As many as 216 million firearms are in private hands nationwide, more than double the total in 1970, and a new United States News poll reveals that fully 45 percent of gun owners says the main reasons for owing gun is for security and protection.” Violent-crime rate is very low in places where people know that individuals are owning guns to protect themselves, while in places like middle class neighborhood crime are very high. In the middle class areas like Bronx in New York state guns are in the hands of fewer people so criminal activities like killing, rubbly, raping and kidnaping goes on every day. A person with a gun or a knife do not scare of attacking another person on the road or in that person’s house. On other hand, if the person with the gun found out that the other person is also carried a gun, then the attacker back
Some studies indicate that gun restrictions did not significantly decrease crime rates while gun ownership rates doubled
Individuals should have the right to own a gun, but only for protection. However, gun owners should understand that it is used within reason. If an individual was in danger, their first instinct would be to call for help. Moreover, the people trying to help could take a while and during that time the person in danger could use that time to self defend or use the gun as a threat so that individual buys more time. (Stroebe et al., 2017) state that “Increased gun-purchasing intentions or an increased need of a gun for protection and self-defence” (p. 1). Some individuals have the mentality that if guns were illegal, everyone would be safe. However, criminals who would want a gun are most likely willing to do anything to have access to a gun. Individuals who own a gun