Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the causality relationship between the Health Care industry and nine other industries. Previous literature shows that the volatility of stock prices is informative; Granger causality is applied in this research by the use of a leveraged bootstrap test developed by Hacker and Hatemi-J (2006) to monitor the behavior of the volatility. The results shows evidence that support the volatility of the Health Care industry has an impact on the volatility of the Industrial, Consumer Staples and Financial industries. Also, the Health Care industry market was affected by five out of nine other industries, Energy, Materials, Consumer Staples, Information Technology and Utilities.
Introduction
For
…show more content…
When the government takes over medical costs for people who can’t afford benefits to supplement their care, it hurts the economy. Further, if health care costs are high, many people have less money to spend in areas that normally might flow in daily live markets and all kinds of investment markets which might affect the performance of Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Financial industries. Americans who incur financial debt because of health care costs often cannot recover from the situation; and these unpaid debts create an additional economic …show more content…
We believe, however, that returns response uses only partial market information about stocks. The Traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) holds the opinion that systematic risk would be the only factor that influences asset prices since idiosyncratic risk could be eliminated away by holding a well-diversified investment portfolio. However, recent empirical studies have found that the risk intensity of stocks is mainly due to the idiosyncratic risk of individual stocks. This conclusion was different from CAPM’s argument that only systematic risk would have an effect on returns. Volatility, in many studies, has also been found to carry current and future information. A recent study that attempted to break through the traditional method of calculating returns was performed by Campbell, Lettau, Malkiel and Xu (2001). They successfully separated the volatility of stock returns into market, industry and firms’ idiosyncratic volatility by use of a disaggregated approach. Xu and Malkiel (2003) applied a decomposition method and a disaggregated approach method to decompose volatility of stock returns into systematic volatility and idiosyncratic volatility and found that corporate private information could be reflected to its stock price faster when the institutional investors held a higher percentage of that company’s stock. Hatemi-J, A. and M. Irandoust
“When we debate health care policy, we seem to jump right to the issue of who should pay the bills, blowing past what should be the first question: Why exactly are the bills so high? (Sultz & Young 336)”. It’s no surprise for many Americas today to realize that the cost of healthcare and the cost of having insurance is on the rise. Many people wonder why something stressed as important for every individual to have access to, is so expensive and inaccessible for many. So, why is that something that should be accessible for anyone, is lacking this quality? Many people today lack health insurance coverage, because of the high cost for private insurance or because of the loss of employer-based health coverage. Many Americans during the last decade, especially during the years of economic recession and contraction no longer have access to job-based health care insurance coverage (Sultz & Young 290). As a reaction to the many uninsured individuals and to attempt to control short and long term costs, the government had implemented the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
The health care system has had a negative impact on both insured families and uninsured families. Many believe that health care reforms are unnecessary and hence should not be applied. Reducing health care costs will not necessarily benefit the economy. After spending decades trying to reduce health care costs, some commentators and policymakers now argue that health care costs should be increased to stimulate the economy. At the crux of the argument are the notions that increasing spending on health care will create jobs that can be filled by those losing jobs in other areas of the economy and that implementing long-proposed reforms will reduce health care costs. Nay-Sayers argue that health care reforms will only prevent economic growth, and that increasing health care costs in order to reduce them is an inconsistent belief. These two arguments are fundamentally at odds with each other. Advocates claim simultaneously that it would stimulate economic growth to spend more money on these reforms, and that the reforms would reduce total health care costs.
Universities stemmed some of the biggest medical advances in the health care industry amongst the world. The educational platform for the United States spells long term success for health care, by growing the next generation of top health care providers. In comparison Germany and Canada also are represented amongst the top 50 medical schools in the world, but lack any representation of the top 10 prestige rankings. On top of that, both other countries lack volume and opportunity to receive a valued medical education when compared to the United States.
Health care expenses are a never ending headache that create numerous liabilities. Liabilities are created when goods or services are purchased on credit and obtained through short- term and long- term loans. Health care expenses create liabilities such that payments are made late or no payments are made at all. In some cases, the cost of health care expenses are unaffordable resulting in those type of payments. To prevent large health care debt, many individuals seek health insurance. Health insurance is provided by private insurance companies or by the government. It covers health care expenses and provides the necessary health care. Although, health insurance is necessary it can also be very costly.
Continuous and life-long learning- Unlike other professions in healthcare field one has to keep in pace with the updates going on, know the new technology,
With free healthcare it can really help the economy in many ways. One reason why is the fact that when people are sick they have to stay home from work. Since they have to stay home, they cannot work which means it slows the company down by not keeping up with productivity. If people had free healthcare they can then go to the doctor and get what they need so they can get back to work quicker. Secondly there are some folks out there that have “Job Lock”. This means they are tied to their job because of a certain reason, and this reason is health care. Some companies offer free healthcare and because it is so expensive having to pay for it yourself people do not want to leave in fear of their health. These pair of facts display that free healthcare helps with people 's jobs and businesses. In addition with the fact that people have to pay ridiculous prices for their medical needs people just have to pay them. Having to pay that could put people in debt if they do not have the amount of money necessary. Following this facts having debt hurts us in many ways. With so much debt around America there is no surprise that an average american is around $50,000 in debt according to “Debt.org”. Showing these tells that out
The main economic challenge for the healthcare system in the United State will be the rising expenses associated with Medicare and Medicaid. The Governments share of healthcare spending is predicted to rise to 31 percent by the year 2020 (Keehan, Sisko, Truffer, Poisal, Cuckler, Madison, Lizonitz, and Smith, 2011). This may jeopardize the economic stability and financial security of the nation.
Healthcare costs in the United States have been rising for several years and show no sign of stopping. In 2008, the United States spent on 2.3 trillion on healthcare, more than three times the $714 billion spent in 1990, and over eight times the $253 billion spent in 19801. Although the large amount of money invested in healthcare does translate to better care for Americans, the worsening economic situation, rising costs, and federal government’s deficit have placed a great strain on the system. This includes private employer-sponsored health insurance coverage and public insurance programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. According to the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, a private and non-profit healthcare analysis organization, “in 2008, U.S. health care spending was about $7,681 per resident and accounted for 16.2% of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP); this is among the highest of all industrialized countries”1. Concerns for the enormous strain on the financial systems that fund healthcare and the desperate need to provide adequate healthcare for Americans have driven many a President since Theodore Roosevelt in 1912, to seek some type of healthcare reform and universal healthcare for all Americans. President Barack Obama succeeded where many had failed and on March 23, 2010, a national health reform law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law. On March 31, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued new rules
The intended audience for this argument is any individual who provides or receives health care in America. This paper can also be read and understood by anyone who is curious about the effects of health care costs on Americans.
In March of 2010 President Barack Obama reform Health care in America and implement a new law called the Affordable Care Act. “Millions whom previously could not afford to purchase insurance now had care drastically impacting the way health care would be delivered” (Wilson, 2010). “The Us spends 1.5 times more in health care than any other developed country and 2.5 times more than the average. At least $3000 more per person that Switzerland with comparable income yet americans die earlier and live in poorer health. Growth in the US Healthcare is Unstable , health care spending has doubled in the past 30 years rising from 9.2% of GDP min 1980 to 17.9% in 2014. Health insurance premiums have increased 97% the last decade “(Kane, 2012)
The main cause for the healthcare reform bill is the rising cost of health insurance for the American citizens. From the 1960s to the 1980s healthcare spending went from $28 billion to $255 billion. By the beginning of 2000, healthcare spending increased to $1.4 trillion. The United States economy has slowly declined due to several factors, the cost of health care is one. Presidents, state representatives, hospital and insurance executives, and economists have tried to attack this huge deficit. There are several things that can be done in order to reduce rapidly increasing health care spending. Some actions that could benefit the United States economy is the stop of wasteful
Laurence J. Kotlikoff is a Professor of Economics at Boston University. He is considered one of the nation’s leading experts of fiscal policy, national saving, and personal financing. This book features an economic perspective on how the American healthcare system can be reformed and become practical enough to better provide healthcare services to all Americans with different types of health conditions.
While some argue that a switch to universal healthcare will cost up to $1.5trillion,4 there are other factors at play that influence the economy. Most Americans have health insurance through their employer which causes a huge financial strain on that employer, which is in turn reflected in product and service prices. If the price of goods and services goes up, that could end up hurting the United States’ global competitiveness. Citizens are unwilling to leave their current employer and possibly start their own business for fear of not being able to afford health insurance on their own.5 Some of those would-be entrepreneurs could create the next big product that becomes a critical part of the national economy. On average, the typical family of four in America pays over $20,000 annually on health insurance,7 money that could be pushed back into the economy. This is all in addition to the societal costs caused by the lack of universal health care such as fewer years in the workforce, caused by poor health, and higher cost to public programs like Medicare and the criminal justice system.5 If someone is uninsured until they reach the appropriate age to enroll in Medicare, they could have pre-existing, otherwise preventable conditions that will end up costing more money than it would have to treat them in the first place. In 2005, economist Dr. Kenneth Thorpe published a report in which he calculated the overall
As indicated by the case study S&P 500 index was use as a measure of the total return for the stock market. Our standard deviation of the total return was used as a one measure of the risk of an individual stock. Also betas for individual stocks are determined by simple linear regression. The variables were: total return for the stock as the dependent variable and independent variable is the total return for the stock. Since the descriptive statistics were a lot, only the necessary data was selected (below table.)
Economic theory proposes that there should be a strong link between economic activity and stock prices, given that its price is the discounted present value of the firm’s payout. If this payout is finally a function of real activity, such a link should exist.