The Human Race

A.I. is going to help the human race. A.I. will be able to pick up where humans lack. There isn’t any denying that it might have some setbacks, but the good outweighs the bad in this conversation. I don't agree that A.I is taking over our lives because A.I. has helped us more than ever and it helps us become more educated. I believe this because it can improve scientific advancements, help developing countries, and help people in their everyday lives. A.i. has already helped us with space excursions, creating more jobs, consumer choices, and helping with education. People in the education system use A.I. so often to understand the subjects, teachers show videos to their students for better understanding, and various other reasons.

Marx’s primarily aims to explain how communism will free men, end the class struggle. The work argues that class struggles, and the exploitation of one class by another is the source of all inequality. Marx’s theories become one the motivating force behind all historical developments. The work strongly advocates the freedom of the proletariats which Marx’s claims can only be achieved when property and other goods cease to be privately owned. He see’s that private property has been a problem through out history, capital that aids the ruling class to maintain control. Marx argues that the lower class come together in a revolution and gain power and eventually take the power away from the upper class.

     The Communist Manifesto was written by two world renowned philosophers, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. This book was produced in an era of great suffering and anguish of all workers in a socially distressed system. In a time when revolutions were spreading through Europe like wildfire, Marx organized his thoughts and views to produce the critical pamphlet “The Communist Manifesto”. Marx’s scrutiny illustrates his belief that unless change is to occur the constant outcome will repeatedly remain uniform. This is a novel that displays the differentiation between the Bourgeois and the Proletariat. Class relationships are defined by an era's means of production. Marx’s

Marxist Communism, in it’s most pure form, calls for the abolition of the old society (Pg 86) and radical ruptures of traditionalist ideas” (Pg 87). In it’s place, there must be a reinstatement of a new communist society where all old ideals of capitalism or feudalism or any other “old conditions of existence” (Pg 86) must be dissolved. In process of overthrowing the old society, Marx describes a plethora of other problems of which the proletariat as well as the communist party must face. Within the Manifesto are several different obstacles that haunt the struggle of the proletariat and the Communists. The chief of such obstacles is the “battle of democracy” (Pg 88), which Marx claims it to also be the “first step in revolution” (Pg 87).

"The history of all hithero existing society is the history of class struggle." (Marx & Engels 1848). This statement establishes the setting for the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. A bold proclamation, the Communist Manifesto set the stage at the time for illustrating, so distinctly, a prolonged tension between two opposing and intertwined classes of a capitalistic economy. Still resonating in contemporary society, class struggle, especially between these two classes has long challenged the perception and effective utilization of an capitalistic economy; in present American society, in present European society, and many more societal economies around the globe. Defining these two classes is essential to

In the overthrow of the bourgeoisie the communists’ goal is to create a classless society in which private property will be abolished in favor of a state controlled common labor system. While this ideally would be a solution to the immoralities of bourgeois society, it places a great deal of trust in the hands of the few, who in theory could be just as immoral and exploitative as the old bourgeois society. However, in capitalism, Marx argues, the worker only labors for the advancement of the bourgeoisie, but in a communist society his work serves only to better the society as a whole, and therefore his own life as well. The bourgeoisie will object to the abolishment of things such as religion, laws, political science, and morality, that have all stood up to the test of time, saying that these are eternal truths that are common to all history. However Marx replies that “the Communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideals” (52) This chapter also lays out ten key principles to the communist ideology. These include the abolition of private property and inheritance, a large income tax, centralization of the economy and transportation in the hands of the state, the establishment of a common labor system, and free public education for

Marx’s ideals of communism were drawn from the realization that the cycle of revolutions caused by the class struggles throughout history lead society nowhere. Society as a whole was more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes that were directly facing each other—bourgeoisie and proletariat. According to Marx, in order for society to further itself a mass proletarian revolution would have to occur. The bourgeois, who were the employers and owners of the means of production, composed the majority of the modern capitalists. It was these individuals that controlled the capitalist society by exploiting the labor provided by the proletariats. For example, the bourgeoisie make property into a right

The Communist Manifesto composed by Karl Marx in 1848 is noted as a standout amongst the most powerful political archives on the planet. The distribution of the book earned Marx the notoriety of a conspicuous humanist and political scholar. Regardless of his eminence, there are numerous discussions concerning the thoughts and ideas of socialism figured in the papers that are still heatedly faced off regarding even today. Marx (1998) opened the book with, "The historical backdrop of all up to this point existing society is the historical backdrop of class battles." (p.4). He investigated the class contrasts and social imbalance between the Proletariats and Bourgeoisies, two terms he instituted to speak to social classes that don 't possess the method for creation and social classes. Since The Communist Manifesto was delivered in a period of incredible social trouble, Marx 's craving was to take out the crevice between the two classes keeping in mind the end goal to enhance the social, political, and monetary states of the Proletarians. To accomplish uniformity, Marx urged the Proletarians to scheme against the Bourgeoisies to end the abuse of lower social classes and set up a revolutionary society where class qualification is a jump of creative energy. Nonetheless, his optimal required changes that a general public can 't effectively adjust to and don 't at last give uniformity. Marx 's speculations were set up upon just class stratification and disregarded the numerous

In it, we find the progressive and reactionary ideas of Marx and Engles. The capitalist system fueled by the bourgeoise has torn asunder the proletarian class by limiting him to the bare minimum, without a strong familial relation or sustenance to maintain his way of life. In Marx’s own words, “it has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of Philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation.” Though the situation is dire Marx argues a way to combat this misuse. Daniel Norman eloquently rewrites this idea in Marx and Soviet Reality, “ Communism as the positive abolition of private property as human self-alienation, means the real appropriation of human entity by and for man; thus the complete, conscious return – accomplished inside all

Marx believes that a capitalist system favours the wealthy and disregards the poor (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, & Piper, 2002). “The rich would get richer and the poor would get poorer (Schuman, 2013).” He theorizes the “labour of value”, the value of a good or service should be priced at the value of the labour required for its production (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, & Piper, 2002). In a capitalist economy, goods and services tend to have a surplus value, which in turn benefits only the wealthy. Marx argues that the two distinct classes of individuals, bourgeoisie and the proletariat will forever remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. Thus, he believes a classless society should be created and there should be collective ownership of all capital for production to equally distribute the wealth amongst the people (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, & Piper, 2002). The economic motivator for Marx’s economy is equal distribution of wealth. This ideology is considered to be communism.

According to Karl Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844, “the only wheels which political economy sets in motion are greed and the war amongst the greedy - competition.” A capitalist society, defined by the systems of competition and private ownership, is divided into two classes - the “property owners” and the “propertyless workers” (701). In this system, workers suffer from exploitation and alienation, while capitalists grow wealthier and more powerful.

Imagine a world where the Human Species was not the only dominant one. Imagine the practice of co-dominance with a similar species. This comparable Species is often referred to as the “Neanderthal” but is in fact properly named the Neanderthalensis. They were intelligent beings with culture and basic technologies of their time. Contrary to the way that they are portrayed today they were arguably intelligent. The Neanderthals went extinct 20,000 to 30,000 years ago. Although there are still some debates about who these people were, we know that the Neanderthals are our closest relatives. All that remains of the hundreds of Neandertal groups that scientist have discovered are a handful of funeral sites, tools, bones, pieces of art, and

Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto in order to give a voice to the struggling classes in Europe. In the document he expressed the frustrations of the lower class. As Marx began his document with "the history of all hitherto societies has been the history of class struggles" he gave power to the lower classes and sparked a destruction of their opressors.1 He argued that during the nineteenth century Europe was divided into two main classes: the wealthy upper class, the bourgeoisie, and the lower working class, the proletariat. After years of suffering oppression the proletariats decided to use their autonomy and make a choice to gain power. During the

With the proletariat as a political movement it can resolve matters with the bourgeoisie who were responsible for the upkeep of capitalism – a system ‘characterised by the continuous, single-minded and competitive pursuit of private property by those who owned the means of production.’ With the establishment of a capitalist society there had been an ‘agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands’ – the ‘few hands’ Marx and Engels mention are the bourgeoisie. The bourgeois had previously been able to recover equilibrium in times of political crises that was in their hands, but it is within these crises which would start the ‘conflict between the forces of production and the relations production.’ The foundation for the capitalist system and the cause of competition between labourers and their isolation was ‘wage labour’ – which is the ‘grave-digger’ of the capitalist

As a human race, we must learn how to sacrificially love. We have forgotten what it means to love without bounds, and our world has become self-indulgent because of it.