Two weeks ago, I was reading about corporal punishment while eating a candy bar. It struck me that while teenagers , like us, are against getting spanked or slapped across the cheek, there is another side of reasoning of whether parents should be allowed to use physical punishments on their children. I realized that sweets are a lot like the parental decision to hit a child. Sugar and punishment may be two very different society issues, yet I found that I could take a peek into the perspective of an adult through sugar. Therefore, whenever my presentation on corporal punishment dries out in your mind, think about how sugar and spanks are alike. Corporal punishment between a parent and a child, is a growing dispute between beliefs, researchers and statistics, shown by Harold Grasmick’s Protestant Fundamentalism article. In the United Nations “Declaration of the Rights of the Child,” it is firmly stated that,”...he[the child] may have a happy childhood and enjoy for his own good and for the good of society...”(196). As long as a child has not violated the law, parents should not have the right to impose corporal punishment their children due to the long-term physical and psychological effects.
Many parents believe that they know their child the best. In most cases, parents uniquely provide for their children and treat them with care. Though, this claim falls short because studies have shown that corporal punishment has a high potential for turning into child abuse and
Thomas Eddlem is a longtime freelance writer and high school history teacher. His credentials as related to the topic of corporal punishment is that he is a parent to three children as well as a blogger. His stake in this issue is appropriately used corporal punishment is both effective and beneficial. Additionally, He discloses no noteable financial backing for his opinions. He aims this article at a universal/ friendly audience. His purpose is to persuade the audience to believe that corporal punishment, when used on toddlers, is the most effective means of discipline. He claims a ban
Currently, 24 countries have banned the practice of spanking children; labeling it child abuse. However, in America 49 states permit physical punishment by parents (Gershoff). There are mandates that define appropriate physical punishment, but there is truly no appropriate way to hit a child. Parents often resort to spanking in an effort to control their child’s behavior. It is true that most children will immediately respond to the pain that is inflicted upon them and stop the bad behavior. However, it is proven to make children more aggressive towards others. Furthermore, it is not worth the risk of causing life altering psychological impairments. Instead parents should focus on non-violent forms of discipline, such as positive reinforcement and redirection or time-out. Spanking may give parents the immediate satisfaction of changed behavior, but it is not worth the life-time of damaging
While reading Cleverley & Phillips ' Visions of Childhood I found that many views of the past relating to corporal punishment have changed significantly. During my readings I read things that instantly stood out to me. The first being how many issues and their solutions revolved around religion. John Wesley, was the founder of the Methodist Movement, and he believed that children were born with sin and that it was the parental duty to discipline the unruly child, starting at an early age. During this time period, corporal punishment was a common practice. Wesley used reference to the Bible verse in Proverbs to declare, “Spare the rod, spoil the child”, (Cleverly and Phillips, 1986) in turn parents believed they were doing God’s will with their harsh punishments.
There has been a study that 90% of parents who have toddlers spank or use some other form of corporal punishment, which is outrageous. Even though the numbers have declined form the age of five, in the article it states that adults still remember being punished in their teen age years. It goes into detail of how the mistreatment of children can really harm them without the care giver really putting much thought to it. The generality of the situation puts children at harm and they are trying to conduct studies to show that corporal punishment leads to a risk of developing mental health and social relationships later in their life. Also they can have an increased risk of having depression, suicidal thoughts, alcohol abuse, physical abuse of their own children, and also can lead to wife beating. It really shows how corporal punishment puts the child at
Determining whether physical punishment is an appropriate form of discipline is an issue that exists worldwide. Some parents believe that there is nothing wrong in using physical punishment to discipline a child. They tend to believe that children learn best through pain and feel that physical punishment sets clear boundaries. Corporal punishment is also the least time consuming form of discipline. However, they are unaware of the immense damage they could be causing their children. Physical punishment should not be used as a form of discipline because it creates countless enduring
Each of the reviews has a different viewpoint on corporal punishment; some of the reviews take a look at who is most affected by corporal punishment in terms of focusing their lens on race, socio-economic status, gender, culture etc. Some also take a critical look at the advantages and disadvantages of corporal punishment. Some take a look at the widespread of corporal punishment in the US. Cases against corporal punishment and the effect of corporal punishment on children were also looked into. With all the different ways corporal punishment has been looked into by different research work, there is one common theme every one of them talks about and that is the detrimental effect of corporal punishment on children. Alternative to corporal punishment is what every one of them recommended.
Corporal punishment is one of the most common forms of discipline used in history to straighten out unruly children. It is defined as any non-injurious bodily punishment that is performed with the intention of correcting perceived misbehavior (Paolucci and Violato 198). Since the very late 1970s, research and studies have increasingly shown that corporal punishment, even if it is physically non-injurious, carries many risks of harm, including aggression, mental illness, decreased relationship with parents, and increased long-term misbehavior. Several international organizations have taken a stance against it, and
Thesis: Although using the corporal punishment method in schools is intended to change the behavior of the student, teachers should not be allowed to use this method to punish students because it’s not effective for the child’s behavioral change, and it affects the child’s behavior mentally and physically.
Corporal punishment is the ability to make physical contact as a form of punishment for reprimanding ones behavior. Corporal punishment versus positive reinforcement while they both serve their purpose corporal punishment is known to be more effective. The most common form of disciplining has always been either a spanking, corporal punishment has been dated all the way back to biblical times. Now the corporal punishment that occurred during biblical and slavery times might not be for the greater good, however the individuals who owned slaves thought it to help one complete their job quicker and better. If one slave didn’t do something properly or escaped corporal punishment was enforced which resulted in receiving a beating from a long strap; this is form of corporal punishment is actual abuse, yet it deterred other slaves from committing the same actions as others. As a result corporal punishment has been around for years and serves its purpose for every aspect in life. Throughout my book I’ll be explaining the effectiveness of corporal punishment versus positive reinforcement.
Punishment means many different types of things to many different types of people. Some believe being punished includes the exclusion of electronical devices and other beloved belongings, and others believe it includes keeping the punished locked away somewhere, kept away from the public. Perhaps for some families these punishments work well, but for many others, children do not learn from their mistakes. With corporal punishment though, children learn how to learn from their mistakes. Schools should practice corporal punishment because it prevents future incidents, it prevents kids from losing valuable time, and it keeps traditional values.
Do you all think that physical punishment should be used consequently towards children? Or, do you all feel physical punishment should be banned? First, parents should not be allowed to force physical punishment. When I was a child, my mother used physical punishment towards me every time I did something wrong. Parents have seen physical punishments as a solution to keeping children from making bad choices. Secondly, by parents using physical punishment to teach right from wrong is a harsh situation to be in as a child.
There are many ways to discipline a child. Some ways are you can ground them, yell at them for what they did, or you can spank them. Hitting your child is a form of punishment used throughout history. The most common way people discipline their kids is by Corporal punishment. Corporal punishment is defined as a punishment that can be spanking or slapping a child bare handed. You may also use a belt, paddle, or any flat object to punish the child so that they are in an uncomfortable position or physical pain. Corporal punishment is referred to as physical punishment. This happens when a child misbehaves and the parent needs to discipline the child for what they did. Most corporal punishment happens at home, but also sometimes in public. The way corporal punishment is used should be banned and not used on any children for it changes the child’s behavior, the child’s skills, and its harsh physical punishment.
American schools should not allow corporal punishment. Corporal punishment has been used for centuries, and should not continue, it should stay a thing of the past. Corporal punishment is unfair to students, can emit fear in them, and there is no guarantee a student will stop their behavior. This type of punishment is not right, it should not be done among any child for any reason. If we are going to discipline students, it should not be with a paddle. Students should be disciplined for their actions, but by a detention, not a hit. All 50 states of America must realize this. America should not allow corporal punishment for behavioral issues.
Corporal punishment is the use of physical discipline to make a child behave (Knox & Schacht, 2015). There are different methods of corporal punishment such as spanking, hitting, and much more. Although corporal punishment is used commonly by American families, it is not the best form of discipline. Therefore, corporal punishment should be against the law, for it can negatively affect the child’s mental state, can lead to more physical violence, and alternative forms of discipline lead to better results.
Studies going as far back as the 60’s reflect a negative outcome on physical or corporal punishment that it is suggested that it is avoided. In a study done in 2009 showed that children of mothers who used little to no corporal