The Issue Of Human Rights

Human rights are protected under Australian law in three key ways; statute law, the constitution and common law. It could be argued that if Australia adopted a bill of rights, human rights would be more clearly defined, consistent in all states and territories and more easily understood.

a) Natural right- this refers to the right that an individual has from nature. Such a right is not given by anybody to the person. It is a right that comes naturally for the person. An example is a right to life. This is a right that everybody has naturally. Since this right comes naturally, for those who believe in God say that it is God given right, it should not be taken away from the owner. It should be left to go by itself. Taking away this right is violating the right of the person. For example in Pakistan, the natural right to life of a seven-month pregnant woman was violated by her parents when they cut off her throat thus killing her. The report says that a pregnant

The subject of human rights is a topic that most countries around the world are familiar with. The United States of America has a democratic form of government that receives its power from its people which is a stark contrast to the Islamic theocratic form of government in Iran which has all of its power come from a Supreme Leader, Islamic Cleric. The U.S. was founded upon a document known as the Constitution of the U.S. and Bill of Rights, while Iran’s government is wholly set forth by extreme Islamic laws.

All individuals are allow to certain basic rights in every part of the world. Without consideration of the circumstances, nobody has fairly or righteously impowered to take away these basic rights from ordinary citizens of particular country. The human rights are of different types of rights like, political rights and civil liberty rights. The most significant constitutional human right available to a human being of right to life and physical safety. According to Donnelly and Howard Human rights are the expression of the need for self respect, impartiality, legitimacy, integrity and just ness. The idea of human rights support the scope of justice and virtual. However,several organizational and country heads emphasize the need of women’s human rights and its violation has always been a common phenomenon in different parts of the world(Donnelly & Howard 1987).As, India is home to a growing democracy and to recent magnificent country economic growth. Unfortunately, this has not protected different kind of serious women’s human right abuses and it is remaining a fact of life in many parts of the India.

The gay community has been thriving over the last several years especially within the law, state after state bans fell and proposals passed. The movement is finally being recognized and basic rights are being promised to them in several courts around the country. In states like Idaho one could be fired or be denied housing for being gay, and that being the sole reason. When the bill, to add sexual orientation to the human rights act, was simply eligible to be put up to a vote the people who proposed it were overjoyed. They know the road is long and still work towards it, the smallest accomplishments feel like strides. Why is this attitude still

Human rights are universal rights that we are entitled to. It is a freedom that is guaranteed based on the principle of respect for an individual. As mentioned in the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, human rights are a “recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all member of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world” (Kent, page 80). When asked what our rights are, we tend to get different answers and meanings. Some people recite the rights that they know; but let’s face it, not everyone knows all of the rights that they truly have. The rights we have consist of many things such as the right of having an adequate food supply. The right to

Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, no matter our nationality, where we live, gender, ethnic or national origin, race, religion, language, or any kind of status. We are all equally permitted to our human rights without prejudice. These rights are all unified, interdependent and undividable. Human rights are often conveyed and certified by law, in the manner of treaties, conventional international law, general principles and other basis of international law. Human rights laws place obligations of Governments to take action in certain ways or to avoid doing particular acts, in order to endorse and protect human rights and essential freedoms of individuals or groups. Human rights however come with responsibly.

It is clear that in China there is certainly a lack in the belief of what constitutes proper ethics regarding the treatment and freedom of citizens is. The government of China is a one party system meaning that only one political organization exists, and it is the communist party. The communist viewpoint is that society should be classless, everything should be communal in the sense there is no private ownership, and the leaders of the party are to enforce communist policies and put new ones in place in order to lean the society towards an overall goal of both betterment and equality. This does not sound like the way China is operated now. Frequently, vast and numerous cases of basic human rights violations pertaining to freedom, and a plethora of other categories are brought to the attention of the world. Even though China signed the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) outlining what rights and fundamental freedoms every person is inarguably entitled, China often violates these rights and the government claims that in doing so “social stability” is maintained. The acceptance of, and participation in such violations by the Chinese government makes it apparent that the best interests of the communist party, and economic prosperity are held in higher regard than human rights. Throughout the following dissertation, human rights violations in China will be explored and expanded upon. In addition these violations will be

“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” These opening words of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights express a concept of man which underpins the framework of human rights embodied in the Universal Declaration and the two international covenants of Human Rights. Western political traditions is a concept that it derives from, is in harmony with moral and social teachings to be found in many other traditions and patterns of belief.

The rights of the individual are rights which we receive when being born, we have these rights in order to protect ourselves, to give no one person absolute power, and to be ‘free’. Freedom is one of the most important aspects of society. This was shown by Locke with him believing that we should all have our own rights that no one can take away. This was an ideology that could protect individuals freedom from each other as well as corrupt state.

After examining the readings, it is easy to conclude that unauthorized immigrants to the United Sates do not have enough rights. There are laws that protect migrants, such as a few that were discussed in “The Development of International Human Rights Laws” which protects individuals from torture, or enslavement; individuals also have their right of freedom of religion, along with other basic human rights that were not mentioned (Laets). However, the doctrine that was signed by the United States to protect people within its borders is still lacking in important rights that could further protect migrants from harm.

The international effort to determine and protection human rights has been called the most important socio-political event of our time (Reisoğlu). Gaining momentum as our world becomes increasingly globally informed, human rights is the idea that certain universal, inalienable rights are granted to an individual solely upon their human species citizenship and regardless of their age, gender, religion, ethnicity, race, sexual orientation, or accidents of birth. Although the majority of people and states around the globe rhetorically agree with the idea of universal human rights, the implementation and preservation of these rights in various respects has also been universally lacking. The blatant disregard for human rights affects the entire human community, calling on everyone to actively uphold and advocate for their protection. In international politics, there is an extensive list of the human rights every individual is entitled to, including the right to work, the right to peaceful assembly, and the right to rest and leisure. As important as each individual right is to a meaningful life, the most important universal human right is the fundamental right to life. Yet, violations of the right to life are appallingly prevalent. As such, the right to life is our greatest priority in contemporary world politics.

“Behind every exquisite thing that existed, there was something tragic”—Oscar Wilde. Everything good in the world has a definitive start that sprouts from inequalities, oppression, and a need for fairness. With this in mind, things such as human rights are dated back to violent history. Nazi Germany arguably sparked an interest in human rights as their “good triumphed through the acts of a selfless few or out of the depths of evil”. Human rights refer to the laws, acts and policies initiated in order to protect vulnerable, oppressed people in the world and allow them to possibly thrive in this world. Although women, sexual minorities, and racialized minorities all play a significant role in the development of human rights—racialized

Human rights are inherent; they refer to the basic standards of treatment that all people should be entitled to. They are based on a fundamental belief that all human beings have inherent dignity and worth, allowing citizens to make their own decisions, thus promoting equal opportunities for all people to develop to their full potential . In order to ascertain as to whether or not civil procedure provides adequate protections of these rights within an Australian context, it is essential to first examine the current mechanisms in place in the absence of a Bill Of Rights, and to assess their overall effectiveness.

These actions and behaviors oriented toward the common basic good are not limited to a particular population, but extend especially to the poor and vulnerable. Divisions between rich and poor grow daily, but the needs of the poor and vulnerable must be met first ("Catholic Social Teaching"). Optimum health is an ideal that should not discriminate, but supports health for all people. Because all human life is equally significant and should be equally respected, health is a state that all people should be able to pursue if they choose to do so. This ensures that all people have the option of being fully contributing members of society, not limited by illness or burdened by the expense of healthcare. Patients can be included in the category of ‘vulnerable’, as they are often uneducated about medicine and unable to help themselves. This claim is grounded in the principle that all human beings are united with one another. The human society is one community that must pursue justice and peace for all of its members ("Catholic Social Teaching"). Catholic Social Thought says that we are all in solidarity with one another and as a result should promote the mutual basic goods of both ourselves and others. We may do so by conceding that healthcare is indeed a human right.