The Keirsey

There are four basic temperament groups, which describe human behavior, according to the Keirsey Temperament Theory and they are guardians, idealists, artisans and

With the use of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter – II, I was categorized as a guardian, and the results of the test were impressively accurate. I pride myself on being dependable, helpful, and hardworking. While I do enjoy leisure time with my peers, I become more serious when dealing with my duties and responsibilities. I tend to focus on credentials and traditions, and I can be highly meticulous about schedules and following proper procedures. Although change can be healthy and beneficial, I go about it cautiously. These aspects of who I am strongly influence my decision-making process. I have always been described as an optimist because I am determined to find the positive aspects in all things. This, however, does not prohibit my skepticisms. Whether I am deciding on what to eat or where and how to spend my money, I am consistent in weighing out my options and determining all possible outcomes and consequences. This cautiousness is often mistaken for indecisiveness, but I agree entirely with the statement that, in the end, it is better to be safe than to be

To be sure, Weber’s description of charismatic leadership does not account for all of the forces at play during the election, but his theory does shed light on why many individuals view Trump’s style of leadership as different and necessary in this current political moment. Weber’s discussion of the charismatic leader as an infallible authority with a perceived legitimate claim of power highlights why Trump supporters endorsed his rhetoric despite its many logical, political, and ethical flaws. Yet, according to Weber, Trump’s current style of leadership and authority cannot last in the long-term. This may be a comforting or concerning notion, but nonetheless, sheds light on what may occur during the Trump

I can relate to all of the characteristics related to being a guardian. I take pride in my dependability, helpfulness, and am very hard-working. I also feel that I am a very loyal mate to my husband, and responsible parent, and stable leader. I am extremely cautious and focused on credentials and traditions, and I do seek security.

As for the rest of my test results I think that they were pretty much accurate.

I also scored in the guardian temperament and according to advisorteam.com, we are in good company. This website suggests that George Washington and Barbra Walters also have the guardian temperament. An accurate quote about myself on the keirsey.com overview page is, “Guardians can have a lot of fun with their friends, but they are quite serious about their duties and responsibilities.” I love to have fun, laugh and have a great time, but, I am also a very hard worker and serious about my responsibilities. These results also helped me understand myself more and how I may relate to others.

R. (2012). Fearless dominance and the U.S. presidency: Implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psyc

Although all individuals are unique no matter how closely related they might be, sometimes their similarities over shadow their differences, and yield a very interesting combination of events that almost have a deja vu effect on its audience. The Bush family serves as the perfect illustration for this phenomenon. From their family history and business life, to their life as the Presidents of the United States, Bush Senior and Junior have led quite parallel lives. The thesis seems to be more complex than this.

The results are somewhat similar. No wonder they say that we chose friends that resemble us. My friend and I live in similar environments, both are the students, enjoy the same sports and activities. I believe these factors explain the closeness of the results.

I first became familiar with the Keirsey Temperament Sorter when taking a psychology class last semester. After recently discussing the Barnum effect in that class, I was skeptical to review the results that may just give vague, general descriptions that could fit anyone. I didn't want to read to much into my temperament style description and let it control my actions and beliefs. However, after receiving my results and reviewing the material, I found that the assessment is very accurate and I could connect specifically to many of the descriptions presented. It even helped explain why I wanted to become a teacher. In addition to taking the Keirsey Temperament Sorter then, I also completed it three other times over the summer as part of my final

George H. W. Bush was a Visionary but not an Ethical Leader. In this paper, I will discuss how he used Inspirational Motivation to inspire troops to war, and Dispositional Flexibility to get the world through the chaotic collapse of the USSR. On the other hand, we will prove he was Not and Ethical Leader, because he fell into the trap of Worry over Image when he sent 2500 soldiers into Panama to increase his public image. His lack of depth as a critical thinker while dealing

According to the KTS-II I am a guardian personality type. I agree with the KTS-II diagnosis, guardians make up approximately 40-45 percent of the population. Seems fairly accurate considering most of the post I read were guardians themselves. Guardians are typically down to earth, trusted, hardworking, dependable, and practical individuals ("Keirsey," n.d.). Going off the cuff isn't typically with-in a guardians wheel house.

I have never taken a personality test until the Keirsey Temperament test. However, the results were not that surprising to me. I was placed in the guardian category, specifically provider and protector. The guardian temperament has many traits that I can relate to. “Guardians tend to be dutiful, cautious, humble, and focused on credentials and traditions.” (David Keirsy) Due to experiences in my past, I find myself often very cautious when making decisions and also when giving advice. The other words that stuck out to me in the description were focused and loyal. Specifically focused, I am a task oriented person and once I start something, I have to finish it. This is something most people that know me will point out also.

Overall, I believe that the test was fairly accurate in measuring certain factors of my personality so much so that it was difficult for me to find certain factors that I did not agree with. However there were two factors, E (dominance) and Q1 (rebelliousness), which I believe were a bit overrated in myself. Aside from these the test seemed to adequately define facets of my personality. For “warmth” (factor A) my sten score read 4, indicating that I am slightly more reserved and critical that easygoing and good-natured. I scored a 7 in “ego strength” (factor C), classifying me as more stable and emotionally mature and less emotional and changeable in attitudes. In dominance (factor E) my sten score read 8, meaning I am more assertive, competitive and stubborn rather than submissive, dependent and humble. I received an average score of 5 in “impulsivity” (factor F) indicating a slightly more serious and sober approach to the world over the cheerful and enthusiastic view. As for “boldness” (factor H), I received a sten score of 4 signifying a more shy and restrained approach to things as opposed to an adventurous genial one. I received a median score of 5 for “emotional sensitivity” (factor I) demonstrating my slightly more tough-minded and self-reliant view in contrast to a sensitive insecure one. For “imagination” (factor M) a score of 8, indicating that I am more imaginative, unconventional and absorbed in ideas and am less so for practicality and the prosaic.

Reflection on my behaviour in the workplace and my learning group I completed the online Keirsey Temperament