After the disclosures by Edward Snowden turned a critical eye to the NSA many people questioned the legality of the acts. The NSA claimed that their work was legal and had prevented many terrorist plots. However, evidence of only four plots was ever found. Even if the acts were founded in law, they still angered large numbers of citizens. Many citizens do not care if the spying is legal, believing that it is morally wrong. Government surveillance organizations have grown to be extremely powerful and are capable of accessing large swaths of personal information; these abilities intrude into the private lives of citizens and need to be curtailed.
The NSA collects information via various means. Some information is taken during transmission
…show more content…
With this information at hand, consumer trust in the companies dropped significantly; most notably overseas where the NSA has fewer restrictions on what information could not be taken about individuals. This is just a dragnet, a collection of basic information on everybody. If they have a suspect, then they are more specific in their search. In a search for possible associates that might provide information about possible plots the NSA can search three “jumps”, or degrees of separation, from the target. This means that a friend of a friend of a friend of a target can be spied on more so than the usual dragnet approach. This may seem like a relatively small quantity at first, but considering that the average Facebook user has 190 friends, 16% of which are friends with each other, from one subject it is possible that over 5 million individuals can be spied on from one individual. Even a subject having just one friend or associate can result in over 26 thousand individuals being the subject of spying efforts. Of course, there are more ways to retrieve personal information than just phone records and Facebook profiles. The NSA can access any and all e-mail transmissions, the audio and video from services such as Skype, and documents saved on cloud storage services. Cars often have black boxes which record information such as speed, acceleration,
Snowden’s leaked information prompted debates all over and it brought major concerns about personal privacy and the security of citizens. His actions to risk his personal freedom to bring controversial information to the public domain is an act of great patriotism, it upholds the virtues contained in the US constitution. (Gurnow, 2014) Nonetheless, ever since the events of terrorism in 2001, the NSA has given spy agencies mandates to carry out surveillance on suspicious persons, thus reducing acts of
Many companies have gathered personal information online to target ads with the user’s preferences, but tracking can allow companies to find out your credit card number, where you live and your interests. Hence, the NSA should be incriminated for utilizing personal information that can endanger a person’s security by using information from social networks, experimenting and distributing information.
Privacy is what allows people to feel secure in their surroundings. With privacy, one is allowed to withhold or distribute the information they want by choice, but the ability to have that choice is being violated in today’s society. Benjamin Franklin once said, “He who sacrifices freedom or liberty will eventually have neither.” And that’s the unfortunate truth that is and has occurred in recent years. Privacy, especially in such a fast paced moving world, is extremely vital yet is extremely violated, as recently discovered the NSA has been spying on U.S. citizens for quite a while now; based on the Fourth Amendment, the risk of leaked and distorted individual information, as well as vulnerability to lack of anonymity.
Body 4 Con: Numbers suggest effectiveness, one prevented attack could save billions especially with groups like ISIS only continually growing
Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as
In 2013, it was revealed by Edward Snowden that the National Security Agency (NSA) was spying on the public through tapping phones and internet records. Snowden encountered an ethical dilemma when he had to choose between being loyal to his employer and informing the public about the mass surveillance. While the intentions of the NSA were to keep the American public safe, their method of mass surveillance is a violation of people’s privacy and ineffective at stopping crime. This can be explained by examining who Edward Snowden is, why he exposed the mass surveillance scandal, and what exactly the mass surveillance scandal was. Edward Snowden worked as a system administrator for the NSA, where he was exposed to a lot of the NSA’s secrets and documents (Greenwald 2015:
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…” This statement has long been a fundamental piece of the law that makes up the foundation of the United States of America. In recent years, however, many citizens have come to believe that their Fourth Amendment Right of protection from unlawful search and seizure is being infringed upon by government organizations such as the National Security Agency. The question that many have asked about what is now known as mass surveillance is, are citizens rights being infringed upon?
We all value our privacy, and we all know that privacy can conflict with other important social values. However, in this increasingly digital and technological world, we are more susceptible than ever to government intrusion of our digital communications and data. This came to light in June 2013, when former National Security Agency (NSA) employee Edward Snowden revealed thousands of classified documents detailing the intrusive mass surveillance and bulk data collection of the NSA to journalists and subsequently the American public. As a result, widespread distrust and questioning of the American government’s data-collection programs grew among American citizens and bipartisan leaders who were also subject to the surveillance apparatus of the
In May of 2013 Edward Snowden leaked NSA documents revealing that the organization had been, warrantlessly spying on U.S. citizens, via the internet. (Britannica) The information leaked showed that the NSA had been tapping phones and monitoring citizen’s text messages, emails and social media. (NPR) Snowden has said that he brought these documents to light, not to discredit the government’s method, but to expose it’s methods. Snowden wanted to allow the people of the United States to decide for themselves. (Britannica)
Toobin, Jeffery. "Edward Snowden, the N.S.A. Leaker, Is No Hero." The New Yorker. The New
After 9/11, the country was thrown into disarray and our government started to take strides trying to ensure our protection. We all knew about the new TSA and other travel restrictions, but the National Security Agency (NSA) was not nearly as transparent. The famous whistleblower, Edward Snowden, who used to work for the NSA revealed the programs bulk data collection programs. Passionate debates sparked afterwards revolving around things such as privacy and the Fourth Amendment. Those in our country felt as they had their rights violated due to the domestic data collection. This is important because these provisions were meant to protect us, and they’ve barely done that while taking draining funds and our feelings of safety.
The United States government frequently, and without any court warrants, collects phone logs of millions of people. The government also has a complicated system that keeps an in depth log of information on citizens. Privacy is a very valued part of most citizens' life. The government spying on a person is some people's(namely the older generation's) absolute worst fear. With social media on the rise, many people forty and older are horrified at the idea that their children and grandchildren are putting their whole lives out on the internet for the world to see. Many have applauded Snowden for exposing the atrocities and invasion of privacy that the government has been doing. He is now a fugitive who must hide far away from his country in Hong Kong. Edward Snowden observed that the American people were being violated and even though it would forever change his life by making him a fugitive, he made sure that everyone knew about it. Most people are understanding that national security must be increased due to the alarming increase of terrorism around the world, but now innocent Americans are taking steps to make sure that their personal information can be protected from the prying eyes of Big
These words alone spark concern amongst citizens due to the methods and the limited understanding of what information is analyzed and stored. When Eric Snowden released the details of the domestic and foreign intelligence gathering programs of the National Security Agency (NSA), World leaders and citizens alike were surprised and outraged at the range and scope of the data that was collected (BBC News 2014). Although his actions were illegal in nature, they exposed the extent to which intelligence collection had grown beyond the initial scope and intent of the laws that were passed following
In June of 2013, Edward Snowden, a former NSA employee, exposed the world to the many shady practices taking place behind the closed doors of both the U.S. and U.K. governments at the time. The National Security Agency (NSA) and other intelligence agencies within the United States, were using illegal tactics in order to spy on their own citizens in efforts to determine possible threats. What was so shocking to the world was the fact that these intelligence agencies were doing so on their own terms and were operating without the permission of the public. They were hacking into people’s phones and computers and reading private messages. When word of this leaked to the public, the United States began to panic, as they felt that their every move
In 2013 a contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA) by the name of Edward Snowden stole copies of hundreds of classified documents detailing the extent of the NSA’s digital mass surveillance program. After stealing the documents, he traveled to Hong Kong to meet with several journalists. While in Hong Kong they went over the documents, and the news was published several days later. As the documents revealed, the NSA obtained access to the records and data of many large internet companies, including, but not limited to, Microsoft, Google, and Apple. This enabled the NSA to essentially view all electronic data, private or public, on any American citizen or foreign citizen, whether or not they had a search warrant as per the Fourth Amendment. While Edward Snowden should be punished for illegally leaking classified information which revealed the extent of government surveillance of the common American; the government was still wrong in violating the American people’s constitutional right to privacy and there could be severe consequences for their actions.